Abstract:The accurate prediction of axial capacity remains a challenging task for piles driven in sands. Rigorous database studies have become key tools for assessing the efficacy of design methods. This paper employs the 117 high-quality entries in the recently developed Zhejiang University – Imperial College London (ZJU–ICL) database to check for potential biases between nine prediction procedures, considering a range of factors. The analysis highlights the critical importance of addressing age after driving, open and closed ends, tension versus compression, and concrete compared to steel. It also shows the hierarchy of reliability parameters associated with the alternative approaches. The “full” Imperial College pile (ICP) approach and The University of Western Australia (UWA) approaches are found to have significant advantages in eliminating potential biases. It is also argued that design load and resistance or safety factors should be varied to match the design and site investigation methods applied, as well as the loading uncertainty and degree of load cycling, which often vary between applications. Noting that predictions for base capacities Qbare inherently less reliable than for shaft Qs, especially in rapidly varying ground profiles, credible lower bound parameters (cone resistance, qc) are recommended for Qbassessment. It is also recommended that the potential effects of cycling be addressed carefully in cases that involve substantial environmental loading.

Reliability Assessment of Pressure Vessel Design Methods

Design Method Reliability Assessment from an Extended Database of Axial Load Tests on Piles Driven in Sand

Advances in "design by Analysis" Methods for Pressure Vessels

Evaluation of DBA-L pressure vessel design method by 2D and 3D solid models

A New Pressure Vessel Design by Analysis Method Avoiding Stress Categorization

Assessment of DBA-L Pressure Vessel Design Method by a Cylindrical Vessel with Hemispherical Ends

Comparison of design methods for internally pressurized ellipsoidal head

Study on Methods for the Reinforcement of Pressure Vessels with Large Openings

Analysis and Comparison of American and Japanese Fatigue Design Method of High Pressure Vessel

Engineering assessment method for LBB stability analysis in pressure vessels and pipes

Load Release Ratio Method for Design of Thermo-Expanded Piping-Vessel System

Limit pressure and design criterion of cylindrical pressure vessels with nozzles

Safety analysis of pressure piping containing incomplete penetration under combined loads

Research On Safety Assessment Method For Pressure Pipe With Incomplete Welding Defects Under Complicated Loadings

Reliability Analysis for Design by Analysis of Primary Stress in Nuclear Power Equipment Nozzle

Calculations of Plastic Collapse Load of Pressure Vessel Using FEA

Plastic Limit Load Analysis for Pressure Pipe with Incomplete Welding Defects Based on the Extended Net Section Collapse Criteria

A New Design Method For Axially Loaded Thin-Walled Cylindrical Shells Based On Elasto-Plastic Buckling Analysis

The Method of Design by Analysis for Cylindrical Pressure Vessels with Spherically Dished Head

Dual Assessment Criterion and Its Programmed Application of Collapse Failure of Pressure Vessels

Elastic-plastic Ratcheting Analysis for Pressure Vessels Based on Elastic Core Evaluation Criterion