Abstract:Ellipsoidal and torispherical heads, whose geometric shapes are close, are usually used as end closures of internally pressurized vessels. In pressure vessel codes, for example, ASME BPVC Section VIII, ellipsoidal heads are designed as torispherical heads using geometric equivalency approaches. However, the difference between ellipsoidal and equivalent torispherical heads has not been studied in detail. In this paper, we first investigate the shape deviation between the two types of heads. Then we compare the elasticplastic behaviors between ellipsoidal and equivalent torispherical heads as well as their failure modes, i.e., buckling and plastic collapse. It is found that ellipsoidal heads have more buckling resistance than equivalent torispherical heads, indicating that the current design rules for buckling failure based on the geometric equivalency approaches result in uneconomical design. Nevertheless, the shape deviation has little effect on plastic collapse pressures of ellipsoidal and equivalent torispherical heads, showing that the geometric equivalency approaches are applicablefor such heads thatfail by plastic collapse (bursting). In addition, the experimental and numerical results show that such heads experience geometric strengthening. The FE method considering the effect of geometric strengthening provides a good prediction about plastic collapse (bursting) pressure. However, the current design equation for bursting does not consider the effect ofgeometric strengthening, also leading to uneconomical design. Therefore, in order to avoid uneconomical design, we recommend that (1) with respect to the buckling of ellipsoidal heads, a new design equation be proposed rather than implementing the geometric equivalency approaches, and (2) the current design equation for bursting be deleted, and a new design equation, considering the effect of geometric strengthening, be proposed for the bursting of ellipsoidal and torispherical heads subjected to internal pressure.

Calculations of Plastic Collapse Load of Pressure Vessel Using FEA

Finite Element Analysis of Plastic Collapse and Crack Behavior of Steel Pressure Vessels and Piping Using XFEM

Plastic Collapse Analysis of Thin-Walled Pipes Based on Unified Yield Criterion

A New Method for Preventing Plastic Collapse of Ellipsoidal Head under Internal Pressure

Plastic Limit Load Analysis for Pressure Pipe with Incomplete Welding Defects Based on the Extended Net Section Collapse Criteria

Safety analysis of pressure piping containing incomplete penetration under combined loads

Plastic Limit Load Analysis of Pressure Pipes Containing Incomplete Welding Defects under Combined Loadings

Engineering assessment method for LBB stability analysis in pressure vessels and pipes

A Simple Formula for Prediction of Plastic Collapse Pressure of Steel Ellipsoidal Heads under Internal Pressure

Plastic Collapse Stresses for Pipes with Inner and Outer Circumferential Cracks

Finite Element Analysis on the Mechanical Properties of the Combined Fittings With a Long Radius and Double Elbows

Research On Safety Assessment Method For Pressure Pipe With Incomplete Welding Defects Under Complicated Loadings

Theoretical Assessment of Burst Failure of Internally Pressurized Defect-Free Pipelines with Plastic Anisotropy

Practical Computation of the Plastic Collapse Limit of Defective Pipelines under Complex Loadings

Plastic Analysis Methods for Design by Analysis of Pressure Vessels

Empirical Correction Factor to Estimate the Plastic Collapse Bending Moment of Pipes with Circumferential Surface Flaw

Advances in "design by Analysis" Methods for Pressure Vessels

Crack growth stability analysis method for LBB assessment technology in pressure vessels and pipes

Dual Assessment Criterion and Its Programmed Application of Collapse Failure of Pressure Vessels

PLASTIC ANALYSES OF STRUCTURES AND FAILURE ASSESSMENT OF PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING WITH VOLUMETRIC DEFECTS

COMPARISON OF ELLIPSOIDAL AND EQUIVALENT TORISPHERICAL HEADS UNDER INTERNAL PRESSURE: BUCKLING, PLASTIC COLLAPSE AND DESIGN RULES