Comment on deardorff

Gene Grossman

1998-01-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Comment on

J. E. Hirsch

2024-01-15

Abstract:In the recently posted

Superconductivity
Reply to comments by D.H.E. Gross

Christopher Jarzynski

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/0509344

2005-09-14

Abstract:This is a brief response to a recent posting by Gross.

Statistical Mechanics
Comment on the Comment on Deformation of Quantum-Mechanics

YQ LI,ZM SHENG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/24/3/384

1995-01-01

Communications in Theoretical Physics

Abstract:This is a reply to the comment by Chung and Chung [J. Phys. A27 (1994) 5037]. We point out that the discussion there is imperfect.
Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman

James V. Zidek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/15-BA944C

2015-09-16

Abstract:Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1509.03410" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.03410">arXiv:1509.03410</a>].

Statistics Theory
The Scrapyard and the Archive: A Comment on Grossmark's "The Untelling"

Dominique Scarfone

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2023.2290278

2024-03-07

Psychoanalytic Dialogues

Abstract:Robert Grossmark's "The Untelling" is an original contribution to the understanding of the psychoanalytic process, especially with the introduction of the notions of Untelling and of Filled-in and Hollowed-out enactments. This comment aims at favoring further exchanges with Grossmark, especially on the problem of meaning in relation to enactment and the importance of the time dimension in the changes that psychoanalysis can bring about. It is, namely, a matter of creating the category of the past. The metaphor of a scrapyard and the dangerous sharp objects it contains is used in relation to the clinical case. The metaphor illustrates how what is brought back through enactment into the analytic process does not carry in itself a fixed meaning, but can be given a workable meaning through handling the transference while ensuring both the reliability of the analytic frame and the analyst's own passibility .

psychology, psychoanalysis
Commentary on, "The Human Affectome," by Schiller et al.

Ralph Adolphs

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105645

IF: 9.052

2024-03-29

Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract:The target article by Schiller and over 200 co-authors appears to be the introduction to an entire issue; I only had the single article available and will thus focus my comments on its content alone.

behavioral sciences,neurosciences
Reply to "Comment on 'What is the force on a magnetic dipole?' "

Jerrold Franklin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ad97f8

2024-11-29

European Journal of Physics

Abstract:I try to respond to the Comment by Kholmetskii, Missevitch, and Yarman on my paper, "What is the force on a magnetic dipole?", but NOTHING in their Comment is about my paper.

physics, multidisciplinary,education, scientific disciplines
Reply to Schneider et al. [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1407.4127v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.4127v1">arXiv:1407.4127v1</a>]

Jörn Dunkel,Stefan Hilbert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1408.5392

2014-08-23

Abstract:We respond to invalid criticism in the recent Comment by Schneider et al. [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1407.4127v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.4127v1">arXiv:1407.4127v1</a>]

Statistical Mechanics
Reply to Comment on "Doppler signature in electrodynamic retarded potentials"

Giovanni Perosa,Simone Di Mitri,William A. Barletta,Fulvio Parmigiani

2024-01-10

Abstract:Calin Galeriu(CG) has commented [1] about our manuscript, "Doppler signature in electrodynamic retarded potentials" [2], that must be properly addressed, amending at the same time of notation errors [3] to clarify some formal aspects which were discussed and criticized in C. Galeriu's comments. The same author (CG) has published three papers concerning the origin of the Doppler term, v/c, in the Liénard-Wiechert (L-W) potentials [4-6].

Classical Physics
Anandanet Al.reply:

Jeeva Anandan,Erik Sjöqvist,Arun K. Pati,Artur Ekert,Marie Ericsson,Daniel K. L. Oi,Vlatko Vedral

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.89.268902

IF: 8.6

2002-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by R. Bhandari.Received 14 May 2001DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.268902©2002 American Physical Society
Comment on "Quantum Physics from A to Z"

Ulrich Mohrhoff

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0508212

2005-08-29

Abstract:This is a comment on a collection of statements gathered on the occasion of the Quantum Physics of Nature meeting in Vienna.

Quantum Physics
Reply to the Comment "Past of a quantum particle and weak measurement"

Lev Vaidman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1310.1319

2013-10-04

Abstract:Misinterpretation in the preceding Comment of my recent analysis of the past of a photon is corrected. There is nothing in this analysis which is "contrary to the usual quantum expectations" but, nevertheless, it does provide "further understanding and interpretation of the system considered". In particular, it teaches us that the naive common sense argument frequently used in the literature including the Comment has to be abandoned.

Quantum Physics
Comment on "Why Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen did not prove that quantum mechanics is 'incomplete'"

Dirk Fischer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0805.2961

2008-05-20

Abstract:This comment on the recently published article "Why Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen did not prove that quantum mechanics is 'incomplete'" (<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0805.0217" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0805.0217">arXiv:0805.0217</a>) by <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://J.H.Field" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> shows that some conclusions, made in the referred-to article, result from an invalid use of dirac delta-distributions.

Quantum Physics
Comment on "Quantum waveguide array generator for performing Fourier transforms: Alternate route to quantum computing"

Daniel A. Lidar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0308124

2003-08-22

Quantum Physics

Abstract:A Comment on the paper "Quantum waveguide array generator for performing Fourier transforms: Alternate route to quantum computing" by R. Akis and D.K. Ferry, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 2823 (2001). The authors reply in Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 2420 (2002).
Reply to the Comment by S.E. Sebastian and N. Harrison

F. Levy,I. Sheikin,Claude Berthier,M. Horvatic,M. Takigawa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0906.4484

2009-06-24

Strongly Correlated Electrons

Abstract:no abstract for comments
Comments on "On Bohm trajectories in two-particle interference devices" by L. Marchildon

Partha Ghose

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0102131

2001-02-27

Quantum Physics

Abstract:Marchildon's arguments against my earlier work are refuted.
Comment to the review by L. Glozman, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="hep-ph/0701081" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0701081">hep-ph/0701081</a>

A.E. Inopin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-ph/0702257

2007-02-26

Abstract:This is a Comment to the recent review by L. Glozman, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="hep-ph/0701081" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0701081">hep-ph/0701081</a>

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Ode to commutator operators

Stephen Semmes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0702462

2007-11-23

Abstract:These brief remarks have been prepared in connection with a conference in honor of my thesis advisor, Richard Rochberg.

Classical Analysis and ODEs
A remark on the article of Edna Cheung and collaborators "Gauge invariant three-point amplitudes in higher spin gauge theory"

George Savvidy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.09913

2021-03-09

Abstract:A remark on the article of Edna Cheung and collaborators "Gauge invariant three-point amplitudes in higher spin gauge theory"

High Energy Physics - Theory
Comment on "Universal Fluctuations in Correlated Systems"

B. Zheng,S. Trimper

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.188901

2001-09-01

Abstract:This is a Comment on "Universal Fluctuations in Correlated Systems".

Statistical Mechanics,Soft Condensed Matter

Comment on deardorff

Comment on

Reply to comments by D.H.E. Gross

Comment on the Comment on Deformation of Quantum-Mechanics

Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman

The Scrapyard and the Archive: A Comment on Grossmark's "The Untelling"

Commentary on, "The Human Affectome," by Schiller et al.

Reply to "Comment on 'What is the force on a magnetic dipole?' "

Reply to Schneider et al. [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1407.4127v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.4127v1">arXiv:1407.4127v1</a>]

Reply to Comment on "Doppler signature in electrodynamic retarded potentials"

Anandanet Al.reply:

Comment on "Quantum Physics from A to Z"

Reply to the Comment "Past of a quantum particle and weak measurement"

Comment on "Why Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen did not prove that quantum mechanics is 'incomplete'"

Comment on "Quantum waveguide array generator for performing Fourier transforms: Alternate route to quantum computing"

Reply to the Comment by S.E. Sebastian and N. Harrison

Comments on "On Bohm trajectories in two-particle interference devices" by L. Marchildon

Comment to the review by L. Glozman, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="hep-ph/0701081" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0701081">hep-ph/0701081</a>

Ode to commutator operators

A remark on the article of Edna Cheung and collaborators "Gauge invariant three-point amplitudes in higher spin gauge theory"

Comment on "Universal Fluctuations in Correlated Systems"