Reply to comments by D.H.E. Gross

Christopher Jarzynski

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/0509344

2005-09-14

Abstract:This is a brief response to a recent posting by Gross.

Statistical Mechanics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Comment on

J. E. Hirsch

2024-01-15

Abstract:In the recently posted

Superconductivity
Comment on deardorff

Gene Grossman

1998-01-01

Abstract:
Reply to Schneider et al. [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1407.4127v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.4127v1">arXiv:1407.4127v1</a>]

Jörn Dunkel,Stefan Hilbert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1408.5392

2014-08-23

Abstract:We respond to invalid criticism in the recent Comment by Schneider et al. [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1407.4127v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.4127v1">arXiv:1407.4127v1</a>]

Statistical Mechanics
Reply to commentaries on Health Problems

Elizabeth Barnes Corcoran Department of Philosophy,University of Virginia,Charlottesville,VA,USA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2024.2414923

2024-10-19

Philosophical Psychology

Abstract:I am grateful to and honored by the time the authors in this symposium have taken to discuss my recent book Health Problems . I don't have the space in what follows to fully address the issues they raise, but I hope to highlight some key points of challenge and disagreement, and offer some preliminary responses.

psychology, multidisciplinary,ethics
comment on Alan V

Gene Grossman

1998-01-01

Abstract:
Comment on "Negative heat ..." by Moretto et al

D.H.E.Gross

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.nucl-th/0012047

2000-12-14

Abstract:The recent paper <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="nucl-th/0012037" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0012037">nucl-th/0012037</a> by Moretto et al. is commented

Nuclear Theory,Statistical Mechanics,Atomic and Molecular Clusters
Reply to "Comment on 'What is the force on a magnetic dipole?' "

Jerrold Franklin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ad97f8

2024-11-29

European Journal of Physics

Abstract:I try to respond to the Comment by Kholmetskii, Missevitch, and Yarman on my paper, "What is the force on a magnetic dipole?", but NOTHING in their Comment is about my paper.

physics, multidisciplinary,education, scientific disciplines
Reply to the Comment by S.E. Sebastian and N. Harrison

F. Levy,I. Sheikin,Claude Berthier,M. Horvatic,M. Takigawa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0906.4484

2009-06-24

Strongly Correlated Electrons

Abstract:no abstract for comments
Response to <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1005.2615" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.2615">arXiv:1005.2615</a>

J.I. Collar,D.N. McKinsey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1005.3723

2010-05-20

Abstract:Brief response to a Reply [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1005.2615" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.2615">arXiv:1005.2615</a>] on our Comments [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1005.0838" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.0838">arXiv:1005.0838</a>] on XENON100 recent results [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1005.0380" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.0380">arXiv:1005.0380</a>].

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics,High Energy Physics - Experiment,High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Qin Et Al. Reply

Nan Qin,Emmanuelle Le Chatelier,Jing Guo,Edi Prifti,Lanjuan Li,S. Dusko Ehrlich

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14852

IF: 64.8

2015-01-01

Nature

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by J. H. Chen and H. Y. Fan.Received 22 May 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.269502© 2013 American Physical Society
Reply to Comment on ‘quantum Principle of Relativity’

Andrzej Dragan,Artur Ekert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/acec62

2023-01-01

New Journal of Physics

Abstract:We refute criticisms by Del Santo and Horvat towards our paper "Quantum principle of relativity": most of their counterarguments can be dismissed, and the rest provides further evidence to our claims.
Response to Comment on "A global environmental crisis 42,000 years ago"

Alan Cooper,Chris S M Turney,Jonathan Palmer,Alan Hogg,Matt McGlone,Janet Wilmshurst,Andrew M Lorrey,Timothy J Heaton,James M Russell,Ken McCracken,Julien G Anet,Eugene Rozanov,Marina Friedel,Ivo Suter,Thomas Peter,Raimund Muscheler,Florian Adolphi,Anthony Dosseto,J Tyler Faith,Pavla Fenwick,Christopher J Fogwill,Konrad Hughen,Matthew Lipson,Jiabo Liu,Norbert Nowaczyk,Eleanor Rainsley,Christopher Bronk Ramsey,Paolo Sebastianelli,Yassine Souilmi,Janelle Stevenson,Zoe Thomas,Raymond Tobler,Roland Zech

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abh3655

IF: 56.9

2021-11-19

Science

Abstract:Our paper about the impacts of the Laschamps Geomagnetic Excursion 42,000 years ago has provoked considerable scientific and public interest, particularly in the so-called Adams Event associated with the initial transition of the magnetic poles. Although we welcome the opportunity to discuss our new ideas, Hawks’ assertions of misrepresentation are especially disappointing given his limited examination of the material.
He and Hubbell Reply:

Fangliang He,Stephen P. Hubbell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.95.189804

IF: 8.6

2005-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Edith Perrier et al.Received 30 August 2005DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.189804©2005 American Physical Society
Reply to the comment on "Quantum principle of relativity"

Andrzej Dragan,Artur Ekert

2023-08-31

Abstract:We discuss critical remarks raised by Horodecki towards our work on the connection between superluminal extension of special relativity and fundamental aspects of quantum theory.

Quantum Physics
Xie and Hsu Reply

Rui-Hua Xie,Paul S. Hsu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.100.159302

IF: 8.6

2008-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by G. Van Hooydonk.Received 19 December 2007DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.159302©2008 American Physical Society
Reply to "Comment on `Extending the laws of thermodynamics for arbitrary autonomous quantum systems'"

Cyril Elouard,Camille Lombard Latune

2023-09-15

Abstract:In his Comment [1], Philip Strasberg (PS) argues from the analysis of different examples that the framework we have presented in [2] does not recover known results of macroscopic textbook thermodynamics. Here, we show that such apparent contradictions disappear when the necessary assumptions the aforementioned known results pre-suppose are applied. Those assumptions concern the control ability of the observer, the nature of the described degree of freedom, or the scale of the systems. The ability to relax those assumptions is precisely a motivation of our framework, which can explore the capacity of quantum systems to exchange work and heat even at scales not captured by textbook thermodynamics. We take the opportunity of this reply to further expand on the use of our framework and its connections with traditional thermodynamics.

Quantum Physics
Reply to Comment by J. Szilagyi and R. Crago on “derivation of a Sigmoid Generalized Complementary Function for Evaporation with Physical Constraints”

Songjun Han,Fuqiang Tian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2018wr023844

IF: 5.4

2019-01-01

Water Resources Research

Abstract:Szilagyi and Crago criticized our sigmoid generalized complementary function from the boundary conditions and physical limits under the completely wet environments. We believe that their comments originate from different perspectives on the generalized complementary principle. In this reply, we clarify our perspectives, and explain our boundary conditions and physical constraints under the completely wet environments.
Replies to commentaries on beyond playing 20 questions with nature

Abdullah Almaatouq,Thomas L. Griffiths,Jordan W. Suchow,Mark E. Whiting,James Evans,Duncan J. Watts

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x23002789

2024-01-01

Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Abstract:Abstract Commentaries on the target article offer diverse perspectives on integrative experiment design. Our responses engage three themes: (1) Disputes of our characterization of the problem, (2) skepticism toward our proposed solution, and (3) endorsement of the solution, with accompanying discussions of its implementation in existing work and its potential for other domains. Collectively, the commentaries enhance our confidence in the promise and viability of integrative experiment design, while highlighting important considerations about how it is used.

behavioral sciences,neurosciences,psychology, biological
Wang Et Al. Reply

H. Wang,M. M. Rosario,N. A. Kurz,B. Y. Rock,M. Tian,P. T. Carrigan,Y. Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.101.229702

IF: 8.6

2008-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by V. H. Dao and L. F. Chibotaru.
Comment to the review by L. Glozman, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="hep-ph/0701081" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0701081">hep-ph/0701081</a>

A.E. Inopin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-ph/0702257

2007-02-26

Abstract:This is a Comment to the recent review by L. Glozman, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="hep-ph/0701081" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0701081">hep-ph/0701081</a>

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology