Comment to the review by L. Glozman, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="hep-ph/0701081" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0701081">hep-ph/0701081</a>

A.E. Inopin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-ph/0702257

2007-02-26

Abstract:This is a Comment to the recent review by L. Glozman, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="hep-ph/0701081" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0701081">hep-ph/0701081</a>

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Comment on papers <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="hep-ph/0603166" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0603166">hep-ph/0603166</a>, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="hep-ph/0606291" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0606291">hep-ph/0606291</a>, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="hep-ph/0606310" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0606310">hep-ph/0606310</a> by S.S. Afonin

A. E. Inopin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-ph/0607286

2006-07-26

Abstract:This is a Comment to the recent 3 papers by S.S. Afonin

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Gao et al. Reply

Hong-Jun Gao,Karl Sohlberg,Z. Q. Xue,H. Y. Chen,S. M. Hou,L. P. Ma,X. W. Fang,Stephen J. Pennycook

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.87.179707

IF: 8.6

2001-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Yanming Zhao et al.Received 2 June 2001DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.179707©2001 American Physical Society
Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Lu-Ming Duan,Guang-Can Guo

1997-01-01

Abstract:In the comment, Zanardi and Rasetti argue that several claims in our recent letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1953, 1997) are questionable. The reply shows these claims remain true.
Reply to the Comment, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3243v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3243v1">arXiv:0810.3243v1</a> by B. Geyer, G. L. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen, and. V. M. Mostepanenko

L. P. Pitaevskii

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0811.3081

2008-11-19

Abstract:It is shown that criticism of my paper <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0801.0656" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0656">arXiv:0801.0656</a> Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 101, 163202 (2008) by the authors of Comment <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3243v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3243v1">arXiv:0810.3243v1</a> is wrong and that their main arguments are in contradiction with established concepts of statistical physics.

Statistical Mechanics
Qin Et Al. Reply

Nan Qin,Emmanuelle Le Chatelier,Jing Guo,Edi Prifti,Lanjuan Li,S. Dusko Ehrlich

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14852

IF: 64.8

2015-01-01

Nature

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by J. H. Chen and H. Y. Fan.Received 22 May 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.269502© 2013 American Physical Society
Xiang et al. reply.

H J Xiang,Bing Huang,Erjun Kan,Su-Huai Wei,X G Gong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.112.199802

IF: 8.6

2014-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by M. Amsler et al.Received 4 December 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.199802© 2014 American Physical Society
Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman

James V. Zidek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/15-BA944C

2015-09-16

Abstract:Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1509.03410" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.03410">arXiv:1509.03410</a>].

Statistics Theory
Gregoryanzet Al.reply:

Eugene Gregoryanz,Russell J. Hemley,Ho-kwang Mao,R. E. Cohen,Philippe Gillet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.90.079702

IF: 8.6

2003-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Margin H. Müser and Philipp Schöffel.Received 1 November 2002DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.079702©2003 American Physical Society
Comment on "Observation of the e/3 fractionally charged Laughlin quasiparticles" and "Direct Observation of Fractional Charge"

V.J. Goldman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/9708041

1997-08-06

Abstract:comment on <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="cond-mat/9706300" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9706300">cond-mat/9706300</a>7 and <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="cond-mat/9707289" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9707289">cond-mat/9707289</a>

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics
Wexleret Al.reply:

Carlos Wexler,D. J. Thouless,Ping Ao,Qian Niu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.81.4277

IF: 8.6

1998-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by E. B. Sonin.Received 9 September 1998DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4277©1998 American Physical Society
Zu et al. reply:.

C Zu,Y-X Wang,D-L Deng,X-Y Chang,K Liu,P-Y Hou,H-X Yang,L-M Duan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.110.078902

IF: 8.6

2013-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by E. Amselem et al.Received 4 December 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.078902© 2013 American Physical Society
Reply to Comment on "No Black Holes from Light" [

Álvaro Álvarez-Domínguez,Luis J. Garay,Eduardo Martín-Martínez,José Polo-Gómez

2024-08-21

Abstract:We discuss how the comment by A. Loeb [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2408.06714" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.06714">arXiv:2408.06714</a>] has no bearing on the results of Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 041401 (2024) [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2405.02389" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.02389">arXiv:2405.02389</a>].

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,High Energy Physics - Theory,Quantum Physics
Reply to the Comment "Past of a quantum particle and weak measurement"

Lev Vaidman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1310.1319

2013-10-04

Abstract:Misinterpretation in the preceding Comment of my recent analysis of the past of a photon is corrected. There is nothing in this analysis which is "contrary to the usual quantum expectations" but, nevertheless, it does provide "further understanding and interpretation of the system considered". In particular, it teaches us that the naive common sense argument frequently used in the literature including the Comment has to be abandoned.

Quantum Physics
Response to <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1005.2615" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.2615">arXiv:1005.2615</a>

J.I. Collar,D.N. McKinsey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1005.3723

2010-05-20

Abstract:Brief response to a Reply [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1005.2615" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.2615">arXiv:1005.2615</a>] on our Comments [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1005.0838" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.0838">arXiv:1005.0838</a>] on XENON100 recent results [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1005.0380" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.0380">arXiv:1005.0380</a>].

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics,High Energy Physics - Experiment,High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Comment on: "The interaction of neutrons with 7Be at BBN temperatures: Lack of Standard Nuclear Solution to the Primordial 7Li Problem" by M. Gai et al

M. Paul,R. Dressler,U. Koester,D. Schumann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2008.06049

2020-10-28

Abstract:The article recently published by M. Gai et al. claims to reach conclusions from a collaborative experiment dedicated to the study of the 7Be(n,alpha) reaction. These claims were published with no authorization from key collaborators, including a PI of the experiment. The Authors of the present Comment reject the conclusions of M. Gai et et al. and condemn the scientific and ethical misconduct involved in their publication. A formal Comment, similarly expressing the Authors' rejection of these conclusions was submitted to EPJ Web of Conferences who published the above article.

Nuclear Experiment
Chen and Itoi Reply

Wei Chen,Chigak Itoi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/9405182

1994-05-27

High Energy Physics - Theory

Abstract:We reply a Comment (hep-th/xxx) on our recent paper published in Phys Rev Lett 72 (1994) 2527-2530. We point out that the author of the Comment overlooks the highly non-trivial Chern-Simons interactions and his hand-waving arguments are totally groundless.
Response to Comment on "Pairing and Phase Separation in a Polarized Fermi Gas"

Guthrie B. Partridge,Wenhui Li,Ramsey I. Kamar,Yean-An Liao,Randall G. Hulet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130697

2006-09-28

Abstract:Zwierlein and Ketterle rely on subjective arguments and fail to recognize important differences in physical parameters between our experiment and theirs. We stand by the conclusions of our original report.

Superconductivity,Strongly Correlated Electrons
Comment on "A Spin Entanglement Witness for Quantum Gravity" and on "Gravitationally Induced Entanglement between Two Massive Particles is Sufficient Evidence of Quantum Effects in Gravity"

C. Anastopoulos,Bei-Lok Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.11315

2018-04-30

Quantum Physics

Abstract:This is a comment on articles Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 240401 (2017) [arXiv:1707.06050] and Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 240402 (2017) [arXiv:1707.06036]. We argue that gravity-induced entanglement by Newtonian forces is agnostic to the quantum or classical nature of the gravitational true degrees of freedom.
Tang, Feng, and Golubovic Reply:

Chao Tang,Shechao Feng,Leonardo Golubovic

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.74.3500

IF: 8.6

1995-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by E. H. Brandt.Received 27 January 1995DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3500©1995 American Physical Society
Onget Al.reply:

N. P. Ong,Yayu Wang,Lu Li,M. J. Naughton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.98.119702

IF: 8.6

2007-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Lucía Cabo, Jesús Mosqueira, and Félix Vidal.Received 6 July 2006DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.119702©2007 American Physical Society

Comment to the review by L. Glozman, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="hep-ph/0701081" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0701081">hep-ph/0701081</a>

Gao et al. Reply

Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Reply to the Comment, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3243v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3243v1">arXiv:0810.3243v1</a> by B. Geyer, G. L. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen, and. V. M. Mostepanenko

Qin Et Al. Reply

Xiang et al. reply.

Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman

Gregoryanzet Al.reply:

Comment on "Observation of the e/3 fractionally charged Laughlin quasiparticles" and "Direct Observation of Fractional Charge"

Wexleret Al.reply:

Zu et al. reply:.

Reply to Comment on "No Black Holes from Light" [

Reply to the Comment "Past of a quantum particle and weak measurement"

Response to <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1005.2615" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.2615">arXiv:1005.2615</a>

Comment on: "The interaction of neutrons with 7Be at BBN temperatures: Lack of Standard Nuclear Solution to the Primordial 7Li Problem" by M. Gai et al

Chen and Itoi Reply

Response to Comment on "Pairing and Phase Separation in a Polarized Fermi Gas"

Comment on "A Spin Entanglement Witness for Quantum Gravity" and on "Gravitationally Induced Entanglement between Two Massive Particles is Sufficient Evidence of Quantum Effects in Gravity"

Tang, Feng, and Golubovic Reply:

Onget Al.reply: