Chen and Itoi Reply

Wei Chen,Chigak Itoi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/9405182

1994-05-27

High Energy Physics - Theory

Abstract:We reply a Comment (hep-th/xxx) on our recent paper published in Phys Rev Lett 72 (1994) 2527-2530. We point out that the author of the Comment overlooks the highly non-trivial Chern-Simons interactions and his hand-waving arguments are totally groundless.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Comment on “Ground-State Description of Quasi-One-dimensional Polarons with Arbitrary Electron-Phonon Coupling Strength”

QH Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.59.11077

IF: 3.7

1999-01-01

Physical Review B

Abstract:It is shown that the main result presented by Ercelebi and Senger [Phys. Rev. B $53$, 11 008 (1996)] is unreasonable, and is only an artifact produced by a variational scheme rather than an intrinsic property of the system.
Comment on “nonuniversal Exponents in Interface Growth”

H Chate,QH Chen,LH Tang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.81.5471

IF: 8.6

1998-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:Recently, Newman and Swift[T. J. Newman and M. R. Swift, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2261 (1997)] made an interesting suggestion that the strong-coupling exponents of the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang (KPZ) equation may not be universal, but rather depend on the precise form of the noise distribution. We show here that the decrease of surface roughness exponents they observed can be attributed to a percolative effect.
Comment on the Comment on Deformation of Quantum-Mechanics

YQ LI,ZM SHENG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/24/3/384

1995-01-01

Communications in Theoretical Physics

Abstract:This is a reply to the comment by Chung and Chung [J. Phys. A27 (1994) 5037]. We point out that the discussion there is imperfect.
Qin Et Al. Reply

Nan Qin,Emmanuelle Le Chatelier,Jing Guo,Edi Prifti,Lanjuan Li,S. Dusko Ehrlich

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14852

IF: 64.8

2015-01-01

Nature

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by J. H. Chen and H. Y. Fan.Received 22 May 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.269502© 2013 American Physical Society
Chen, Gong, and Wei Reply:

Shiyou Chen,X. G. Gong,Su-Huai Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.99.159602

IF: 8.6

2007-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Changfeng Chen and Hong Sun.Received 30 May 2007DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.159602©2007 American Physical Society
Reply to "Comment on 'Fano resonance for Anderson Impurity Systems' "

H. G. Luo,T. Xiang,X. Q. Wang,Z. B. Su,L. Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/0504177

2005-04-07

Strongly Correlated Electrons

Abstract:In a recent Comment, Kolf et al. (cond-mat/0503669) state that our analysis of the Fano resonance for Anderson impurity systems [Luo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 92, 256602 (2004)] is incorrect. Here we want to point out that their comments are not based on firm physical results and their criticisms are unjustified and invalid.
Gao et al. Reply

Hong-Jun Gao,Karl Sohlberg,Z. Q. Xue,H. Y. Chen,S. M. Hou,L. P. Ma,X. W. Fang,Stephen J. Pennycook

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.87.179707

IF: 8.6

2001-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Yanming Zhao et al.Received 2 June 2001DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.179707©2001 American Physical Society
Reply to the Comment, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3243v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3243v1">arXiv:0810.3243v1</a> by B. Geyer, G. L. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen, and. V. M. Mostepanenko

L. P. Pitaevskii

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0811.3081

2008-11-19

Abstract:It is shown that criticism of my paper <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0801.0656" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0656">arXiv:0801.0656</a> Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 101, 163202 (2008) by the authors of Comment <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3243v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3243v1">arXiv:0810.3243v1</a> is wrong and that their main arguments are in contradiction with established concepts of statistical physics.

Statistical Mechanics
Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Lu-Ming Duan,Guang-Can Guo

1997-01-01

Abstract:In the comment, Zanardi and Rasetti argue that several claims in our recent letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1953, 1997) are questionable. The reply shows these claims remain true.
Reply to "Comment on `Towards exact solutions of superconducting $T_c$ induced by electron-phonon interaction' "

Guo-Zhu Liu,Zhao-Kun Yang,Xiao-Yin Pan,Jing-Rong Wang,Xin Li,Hao-Fu Zhu,Jie Huang

2024-08-07

Abstract:In a series of papers, we have proposed a non-perturbative field-theoretic approach to deal with strong electron-phonon and strong Coulomb interactions. The key ingredient of such an approach is to determine the full fermion-boson vertex corrections by solving a number of self-consistent Ward-Takahashi identities. Palle (see Phys. Rev. B 110, 026501 (2024), <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2404.02918" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02918">arXiv:2404.02918</a>) argued that our Ward-Takahashi identities failed to include some important additional terms and thus are incorrect. We agree that our Ward-Takahashi identities have ignored some potentially important contributions and here give some remarks on the role played by the additional terms.

Superconductivity,Strongly Correlated Electrons
Reply to "Comment on 'Nontrivial Quantum Geometry and the Strength of Electron-Phonon Coupling',

Jiabin Yu,Christopher J. Ciccarino,Raffaello Bianco,Ion Errea,Prineha Narang,B. Andrei Bernevig

2023-06-07

Abstract:This is our reply to "Comment on 'Nontrivial Quantum Geometry and the Strength of Electron-Phonon Coupling', <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2305.02340" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02340">arXiv:2305.02340</a>, J. Yu, C. J. Ciccarino, R. Bianco, I. Errea, P. Narang, B. A. Bernevig" by Prof. Pickett, which focuses on the MgB$_2$ part of our work. We show that the entirety of the criticism in Prof. Pickett's comment pertaining to our work (<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2305.02340" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02340">arXiv:2305.02340</a>) is invalid.

Superconductivity
Response to "Response to 'Comment on Theoretical examination of QED Hamiltonian in relativistic molecular orbital theory'" [J. Chem. Phys. 160, 187102 (2024)]

Wenjian Liu

2024-06-24

Abstract:The Response [J. Chem. Phys. 160, 187102 (2024)] of Inoue and coworkers to my Comment [J. Chem. Phys. 160, 187101 (2024)] on their original paper [J. Chem. Phys. 159, 054105 (2023)] clarifies some points put forward in my Comment, but also raises some new issues that require further clarifications. It is believed that the present Response has settled down everything.

Chemical Physics
Wexleret Al.reply:

Carlos Wexler,D. J. Thouless,Ping Ao,Qian Niu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.81.4277

IF: 8.6

1998-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by E. B. Sonin.Received 9 September 1998DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4277©1998 American Physical Society
Rejoinder to the Response <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0812.2330" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2330">arXiv:0812.2330</a> to 'Comment on a recent conjectured solution of the three-dimensional Ising model'

F. Y. Wu,B. M. McCoy,M. E. Fisher,L. Chayes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14786430802537779

2008-12-16

Abstract:We comment on Z. D. Zhang's Response [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0812.2330" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2330">arXiv:0812.2330</a>] to our recent Comment [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0811.3876" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.3876">arXiv:0811.3876</a>] addressing the conjectured solution of the three-dimensional Ising model reported in [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0705.1045" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0705.1045">arXiv:0705.1045</a>].

Statistical Mechanics
Tang, Feng, and Golubovic Reply:

Chao Tang,Shechao Feng,Leonardo Golubovic

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.74.3500

IF: 8.6

1995-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by E. H. Brandt.Received 27 January 1995DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3500©1995 American Physical Society
Dong and Li Reply

J. K. Dong,Shiyan Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.104.259702

IF: 8.6

2010-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Taichi Terashima et al.Received 14 May 2010DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.259702©2010 American Physical Society
Reply to the Comment [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3247v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3247v1">arXiv:0810.3247v1</a>] by G. L. Klimchitskaya et al. on "Application of the Lifshitz theory to poor conductors"

Vitaly B. Svetovoy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0811.3423

2008-12-08

Abstract:It is shown that the claims expressed in the Comment <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3247v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3247v1">arXiv:0810.3247v1</a> against my paper Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 101}, 163603 (2008) [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0809.3901" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0809.3901">arXiv:0809.3901</a>] are obviously wrong or not essential.

Statistical Mechanics
Xiang et al. reply.

H J Xiang,Bing Huang,Erjun Kan,Su-Huai Wei,X G Gong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.112.199802

IF: 8.6

2014-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by M. Amsler et al.Received 4 December 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.199802© 2014 American Physical Society
Ikeda and Miyazaki Reply to Rolf Schilling and Bernhard Schmid [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1101.5577" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.5577">arXiv:1101.5577</a>]

Atsushi Ikeda,Kunimasa Miyazaki

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1101.5840

2011-01-31

Abstract:Reply to the preceding comment by Rolf Schilling and Bernhard Schmid [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1101.5577" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.5577">arXiv:1101.5577</a>, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 049601 (2011)].

Soft Condensed Matter
Comment on “abelian Chern-Simons-Maxwell Theory from a Tight-Binding Model of Spinless Fermions”

Xi Luo,Yuanpei Lan,Yue Yu,Long Liang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.114.249101

IF: 8.6

2015-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:Received 12 April 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.249101© 2015 American Physical Society

Chen and Itoi Reply

Comment on “Ground-State Description of Quasi-One-dimensional Polarons with Arbitrary Electron-Phonon Coupling Strength”

Comment on “nonuniversal Exponents in Interface Growth”

Comment on the Comment on Deformation of Quantum-Mechanics

Qin Et Al. Reply

Chen, Gong, and Wei Reply:

Reply to "Comment on 'Fano resonance for Anderson Impurity Systems' "

Gao et al. Reply

Reply to the Comment, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3243v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3243v1">arXiv:0810.3243v1</a> by B. Geyer, G. L. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen, and. V. M. Mostepanenko

Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Reply to "Comment on `Towards exact solutions of superconducting $T_c$ induced by electron-phonon interaction' "

Reply to "Comment on 'Nontrivial Quantum Geometry and the Strength of Electron-Phonon Coupling',

Response to "Response to 'Comment on Theoretical examination of QED Hamiltonian in relativistic molecular orbital theory'" [J. Chem. Phys. 160, 187102 (2024)]

Wexleret Al.reply:

Rejoinder to the Response <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0812.2330" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2330">arXiv:0812.2330</a> to 'Comment on a recent conjectured solution of the three-dimensional Ising model'

Tang, Feng, and Golubovic Reply:

Dong and Li Reply

Reply to the Comment [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3247v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3247v1">arXiv:0810.3247v1</a>] by G. L. Klimchitskaya et al. on "Application of the Lifshitz theory to poor conductors"

Xiang et al. reply.

Ikeda and Miyazaki Reply to Rolf Schilling and Bernhard Schmid [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1101.5577" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.5577">arXiv:1101.5577</a>]

Comment on “abelian Chern-Simons-Maxwell Theory from a Tight-Binding Model of Spinless Fermions”