Abstract:In the comment by <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://T.Dauxois" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> et al.,(<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="cond-mat/0605445" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0605445">cond-mat/0605445</a>), the authors question our application of the nonextensive statistical mechanics proposed by Tsallis, to explain the anomalous dynamics of the Hamiltonian Mean Field (HMF) model. More specifically they claim that the explanation of the metastability found in the out-of-equilibrium dynamics is only a fitting procedure and is also in contrast with a previous application. This criticism mostly relies on recent studies based on the Vlasov approach, where the authors claim to explain the anomalous behaviour of the HMF model in terms of a standard formalism. In order to reply to this comment we want to stress a few numerical facts and conclude with some final considerations. A recent paper by P-H. Chavanis (<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="cond-mat/0604234" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0604234">cond-mat/0604234</a>) is also important to clarify the question here debated.

Reply to the Comment [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3247v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3247v1">arXiv:0810.3247v1</a>] by G. L. Klimchitskaya et al. on "Application of the Lifshitz theory to poor conductors"

Comment on "Application of the Lifshitz theory to poor conductors" [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0809.3901" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0809.3901">arXiv:0809.3901</a>]

Reply to the Comment, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3243v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3243v1">arXiv:0810.3243v1</a> by B. Geyer, G. L. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen, and. V. M. Mostepanenko

Reply to Comment [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3244v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3244v1">arXiv:0810.3244v1</a>] by R.S. Decca et al. on "Contribution of drifting carriers to the Casimir-Lifshitz and Casimir-Polder interactions with semiconductor materials"

Reply to Comment on "Quantum Force in a Superconductor"

Qin Et Al. Reply

Chen and Itoi Reply

Comment On "Electromagnetic Radiation Under Explicit Symmetry Breaking" Reply

Barbalinardo et al. Reply.

Reply to the Comment of den Hartog and van Wees on "Conductance Fluctuations in Mesoscopic Normal-Metal/Superconductor Samples"

Reply to 'Comment on Universal out-of-equilibrium transport in Kondo-correlated quantum dots'

Comment on "Giant Nernst Effect due to Fluctuating Cooper Pairs in Superconductors" by M.N. Serbyn, M.A. Skvortsov, A.A. Varlamov, and V. Galitski

Reply to "Comment on `Extending the laws of thermodynamics for arbitrary autonomous quantum systems'"

Gao et al. Reply

Reply to the Comment by T. Dauxois, F. Bouchet, S. Ruffo on the paper by A. Rapisarda and A. Pluchino, Europhysics News, 36 (2005) 202

Reply to 'Comment on "Thermodynamics of quantum crystalline membranes"'

Addendum to the Reply Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 139602 (2009), <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0811.0518" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.0518">arXiv:0811.0518</a>] on ''Dynamic Scaling of Non-Euclidean Interfaces''

Reply to "Comment on 'Fano resonance for Anderson Impurity Systems' "

Li, An, and Morozov Reply:

Yim, Pang, and Thornton Reply:

Reply to "Comment on 'Precision measurement of the Casimir-Lifshitz force in a fluid'"