Abstract:Until very recently, the asymptotic occurrence of intrinsic anomalous scaling has been expected to require concomitant effects for kinetically rough interfaces, like quenched disorder or morphological instabilities. However, counterexamples have been recently reported for simpler situations dominated by time-dependent noise, as in the discrete growth system associated with an Ising model proposed by H.\ Dashti-Naserabadi {\em et al.}\ [Phys.\ Rev.\ E {\bf 100}, 060101(R) (2019)], who assessed the equilibrium behavior of the model. Here we revisit this system to characterize its time-dependent behavior in two and three dimensions (one-and two-dimensional interfaces, respectively). While the 3D case seems dominated by a fast evolution beyond critical dynamics, in the 2D case numerical simulations of an associated time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau equation retrieve the same static (roughness) exponents and the same intrinsic anomalous scaling Ansatz as in the equilibrium case, throughout the full time evolution. However, the dynamic exponent is seen to cross over between two different values, none of which enables identification with previously known universality classes of kinetic roughening. Simulations for larger system sizes moreover suggest breakdown of scaling behavior at the largest scales, suggesting that the previously reported scaling behavior may be effective and restricted to relatively small systems.

Addendum to the Reply Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 139602 (2009), <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0811.0518" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.0518">arXiv:0811.0518</a>] on ''Dynamic Scaling of Non-Euclidean Interfaces''

Comment on “nonuniversal Exponents in Interface Growth”

Qin Et Al. Reply

Erratum: Dynamics of the Bounds of Squared Concurrence [phys. Rev. A 79, 032306 (2009)]

Reply to the Comment, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3243v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3243v1">arXiv:0810.3243v1</a> by B. Geyer, G. L. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen, and. V. M. Mostepanenko

Anomalous dynamic scaling of Ising interfaces

Reply to Comment [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3244v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3244v1">arXiv:0810.3244v1</a>] by R.S. Decca et al. on "Contribution of drifting carriers to the Casimir-Lifshitz and Casimir-Polder interactions with semiconductor materials"

An Et Al. Reply.

Reply to "Comment on `Extending the laws of thermodynamics for arbitrary autonomous quantum systems'"

Universal interface fluctuations in the contact process

Gao et al. Reply

Wexleret Al.reply:

Ku and Eguiluz Reply:

Finite-size and finite-time scaling for kinetic rough interfaces

Reply to Comment on "Quantum Force in a Superconductor"

Reply to the Comment [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3247v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3247v1">arXiv:0810.3247v1</a>] by G. L. Klimchitskaya et al. on "Application of the Lifshitz theory to poor conductors"

Erratum: Dissipative Effects in Odd Viscous Stokes Flow around a Single Sphere [Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 218303 (2024)]

Comment on “Bulk-Driven Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions in a Mesoscopic Ring”

Yim, Pang, and Thornton Reply:

Erratum: Flexible Scheme for the Implementation of Nonadiabatic Geometric Quantum Computation [phys. Rev. A 101 , 032322 (2020)]

Erratum: Frustrated Extended Bose-Hubbard Model and Deconfined Quantum Critical Points with Optical Lattices at the Antimagic Wavelength [Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 153401 (2024)]