Abstract:In the comment by <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://T.Dauxois" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> et al.,(<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="cond-mat/0605445" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0605445">cond-mat/0605445</a>), the authors question our application of the nonextensive statistical mechanics proposed by Tsallis, to explain the anomalous dynamics of the Hamiltonian Mean Field (HMF) model. More specifically they claim that the explanation of the metastability found in the out-of-equilibrium dynamics is only a fitting procedure and is also in contrast with a previous application. This criticism mostly relies on recent studies based on the Vlasov approach, where the authors claim to explain the anomalous behaviour of the HMF model in terms of a standard formalism. In order to reply to this comment we want to stress a few numerical facts and conclude with some final considerations. A recent paper by P-H. Chavanis (<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="cond-mat/0604234" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0604234">cond-mat/0604234</a>) is also important to clarify the question here debated.

Reply to the Comment, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3243v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3243v1">arXiv:0810.3243v1</a> by B. Geyer, G. L. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen, and. V. M. Mostepanenko

Reply to the Comment [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3247v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3247v1">arXiv:0810.3247v1</a>] by G. L. Klimchitskaya et al. on "Application of the Lifshitz theory to poor conductors"

Gao et al. Reply

Qin Et Al. Reply

Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Reply to Comment [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3244v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3244v1">arXiv:0810.3244v1</a>] by R.S. Decca et al. on "Contribution of drifting carriers to the Casimir-Lifshitz and Casimir-Polder interactions with semiconductor materials"

Reply to 'Comment on "Thermodynamics of quantum crystalline membranes"'

Reply to "Comment on 'Nontrivial Quantum Geometry and the Strength of Electron-Phonon Coupling',

Reply to the Comment "Past of a quantum particle and weak measurement"

Reply to 'Comment on Universal out-of-equilibrium transport in Kondo-correlated quantum dots'

Reply to Schneider et al. [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1407.4127v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.4127v1">arXiv:1407.4127v1</a>]

Reply to Comment on "Quantum Force in a Superconductor"

Xiang et al. reply.

Chen and Itoi Reply

Reply to the Comment by T. Dauxois, F. Bouchet, S. Ruffo on the paper by A. Rapisarda and A. Pluchino, Europhysics News, 36 (2005) 202

Comment On "Electromagnetic Radiation Under Explicit Symmetry Breaking" Reply

Rejoinder to the Response <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0812.2330" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2330">arXiv:0812.2330</a> to 'Comment on a recent conjectured solution of the three-dimensional Ising model'

Reply to Comment on "Failure of the work-Hamiltonian connection for free-energy calculations" by Luca Peliti

Reply to "Comment on `Extending the laws of thermodynamics for arbitrary autonomous quantum systems'"

Reply to comment in <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1802.01382" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.01382">arXiv:1802.01382</a>

Reply to "Comment on 'Fano resonance for Anderson Impurity Systems' "