Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman

James V. Zidek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/15-BA944C

2015-09-16

Abstract:Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1509.03410" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.03410">arXiv:1509.03410</a>].

Statistics Theory

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Comment on the Comment on Deformation of Quantum-Mechanics

YQ LI,ZM SHENG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/24/3/384

1995-01-01

Communications in Theoretical Physics

Abstract:This is a reply to the comment by Chung and Chung [J. Phys. A27 (1994) 5037]. We point out that the discussion there is imperfect.
Qin Et Al. Reply

Nan Qin,Emmanuelle Le Chatelier,Jing Guo,Edi Prifti,Lanjuan Li,S. Dusko Ehrlich

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14852

IF: 64.8

2015-01-01

Nature

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by J. H. Chen and H. Y. Fan.Received 22 May 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.269502© 2013 American Physical Society
Comment on Article by Berger, Bernardo, and Sun

Judith Rousseau

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/14-BA937

2015-04-27

Abstract:Discussion of Overall Objective Priors by James O. Berger, Jose M. Bernardo, Dongchu Sun [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1504.02689" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.02689">arXiv:1504.02689</a>].

Statistics Theory
Comment to the review by L. Glozman, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="hep-ph/0701081" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0701081">hep-ph/0701081</a>

A.E. Inopin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-ph/0702257

2007-02-26

Abstract:This is a Comment to the recent review by L. Glozman, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="hep-ph/0701081" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0701081">hep-ph/0701081</a>

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Lu-Ming Duan,Guang-Can Guo

1997-01-01

Abstract:In the comment, Zanardi and Rasetti argue that several claims in our recent letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1953, 1997) are questionable. The reply shows these claims remain true.
Comment: Citation Statistics

David Spiegelhalter,Harvey Goldstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/09-STS285C

2009-10-19

Abstract:Comment on "Citation Statistics" [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0910.3529" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0910.3529">arXiv:0910.3529</a>]

Methodology,Digital Libraries,Physics and Society
Comment on papers <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="hep-ph/0603166" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0603166">hep-ph/0603166</a>, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="hep-ph/0606291" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0606291">hep-ph/0606291</a>, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="hep-ph/0606310" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0606310">hep-ph/0606310</a> by S.S. Afonin

A. E. Inopin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-ph/0607286

2006-07-26

Abstract:This is a Comment to the recent 3 papers by S.S. Afonin

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Xie and Hsu Reply

Rui-Hua Xie,Paul S. Hsu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.100.159302

IF: 8.6

2008-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by G. Van Hooydonk.Received 19 December 2007DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.159302©2008 American Physical Society
Reply to Schneider et al. [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1407.4127v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.4127v1">arXiv:1407.4127v1</a>]

Jörn Dunkel,Stefan Hilbert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1408.5392

2014-08-23

Abstract:We respond to invalid criticism in the recent Comment by Schneider et al. [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1407.4127v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.4127v1">arXiv:1407.4127v1</a>]

Statistical Mechanics
Reply to Comment on "Multitime Quantum Communication: Interesting But Not Counterfactual" by L. Vaidman

Robert B. Griffiths

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.056202

2024-02-02

Abstract:This is a Reply to the Comment by Vaidman in <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2306.16756" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16756">arXiv:2306.16756</a> on the paper: R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023)

Quantum Physics
Gregoryanzet Al.reply:

Eugene Gregoryanz,Russell J. Hemley,Ho-kwang Mao,R. E. Cohen,Philippe Gillet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.90.079702

IF: 8.6

2003-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Margin H. Müser and Philipp Schöffel.Received 1 November 2002DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.079702©2003 American Physical Society
Comment on 'Comment on 'Affine density, von Neumann dimension and a problem of Perelomov"

Luís Daniel Abreu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.08443

2022-12-16

Abstract:In the Letter 'Comment on 'Affine density, von Neumann dimension and a problem of Perelomov', arXiv.2211.04879, by Prof. J. L. Romero, it is claimed that the main theorem of Ref2 := [Adv. Math. 407, Article ID 108564, 22 p. (2022)] is included in the prior research survey Ref1 := [Expo. Math., 40(2), 265-301, 2022]. We provide some background, and demonstrate with hard facts that this claim is false, as well as other claims in the Letter which, in most cases, either result from wrong mathematical reasoning or objectively differ from what is written in the published material. The author might be interested in publicly retracting and apologising for his comments.

Functional Analysis
Zhu et al. Reply:

Xin-Yang Zhu,Shi Wang,Zhen-Yu Jia,Li Zhu,Qi-Yuan Li,Wei-Min Zhao,Cheng-Long Xue,Yong-Jie Xu,Zhen Ma,Jinsheng Wen,Shun-Li Yu,Jian-Xin Li,Shao-Chun Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.125.079702

IF: 8.6

2020-08-13

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Zhu et al.

physics, multidisciplinary
Gao et al. Reply

Hong-Jun Gao,Karl Sohlberg,Z. Q. Xue,H. Y. Chen,S. M. Hou,L. P. Ma,X. W. Fang,Stephen J. Pennycook

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.87.179707

IF: 8.6

2001-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Yanming Zhao et al.Received 2 June 2001DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.179707©2001 American Physical Society
Comment on "theoretical Confirmation of the Low Experimental 3C/3D F-Value Ratio in Fe Xvii".

Kai Wang,Per Jonsson,Jorgen Ekman,Tomas Brage,Chong Yang Chen,Charlotte Froese Fischer,Gediminas Gaigalas,Michel Godefroid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.119.189301

IF: 8.6

2017-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Comment on the Letter by Mendoza and Bautista [Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 163002 (2017)PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.118.163002].
Comment on "Hamiltonian for the Zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function"

Jean V. Bellissard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1704.02644

2017-04-10

Abstract:This comment about the article "Hamiltonian for the Zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function", by C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody, and M. P. Müller, published recently in Phys. Rev. Lett. (Phys. Rev. Lett., 118, 130201, (2017)) gives arguments showing that the strategy proposed by the authors to prove the Riemann Hypothesis, does not actually work.

Quantum Physics
Response to <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1005.2615" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.2615">arXiv:1005.2615</a>

J.I. Collar,D.N. McKinsey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1005.3723

2010-05-20

Abstract:Brief response to a Reply [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1005.2615" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.2615">arXiv:1005.2615</a>] on our Comments [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1005.0838" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.0838">arXiv:1005.0838</a>] on XENON100 recent results [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1005.0380" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.0380">arXiv:1005.0380</a>].

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics,High Energy Physics - Experiment,High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Comment on "Quantum Physics from A to Z"

Ulrich Mohrhoff

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0508212

2005-08-29

Abstract:This is a comment on a collection of statements gathered on the occasion of the Quantum Physics of Nature meeting in Vienna.

Quantum Physics
Comment on "Why Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen did not prove that quantum mechanics is 'incomplete'"

Dirk Fischer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0805.2961

2008-05-20

Abstract:This comment on the recently published article "Why Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen did not prove that quantum mechanics is 'incomplete'" (<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0805.0217" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0805.0217">arXiv:0805.0217</a>) by <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://J.H.Field" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> shows that some conclusions, made in the referred-to article, result from an invalid use of dirac delta-distributions.

Quantum Physics
Reply to the Comment, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3243v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3243v1">arXiv:0810.3243v1</a> by B. Geyer, G. L. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen, and. V. M. Mostepanenko

L. P. Pitaevskii

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0811.3081

2008-11-19

Abstract:It is shown that criticism of my paper <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0801.0656" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0656">arXiv:0801.0656</a> Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 101, 163202 (2008) by the authors of Comment <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3243v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3243v1">arXiv:0810.3243v1</a> is wrong and that their main arguments are in contradiction with established concepts of statistical physics.

Statistical Mechanics

Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman

Comment on the Comment on Deformation of Quantum-Mechanics

Qin Et Al. Reply

Comment on Article by Berger, Bernardo, and Sun

Comment to the review by L. Glozman, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="hep-ph/0701081" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0701081">hep-ph/0701081</a>

Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Comment: Citation Statistics

Xie and Hsu Reply

Reply to Schneider et al. [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1407.4127v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.4127v1">arXiv:1407.4127v1</a>]

Reply to Comment on "Multitime Quantum Communication: Interesting But Not Counterfactual" by L. Vaidman

Gregoryanzet Al.reply:

Comment on 'Comment on 'Affine density, von Neumann dimension and a problem of Perelomov"

Zhu et al. Reply:

Gao et al. Reply

Comment on "theoretical Confirmation of the Low Experimental 3C/3D F-Value Ratio in Fe Xvii".

Comment on "Hamiltonian for the Zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function"

Response to <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1005.2615" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.2615">arXiv:1005.2615</a>

Comment on "Quantum Physics from A to Z"

Comment on "Why Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen did not prove that quantum mechanics is 'incomplete'"

Reply to the Comment, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3243v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3243v1">arXiv:0810.3243v1</a> by B. Geyer, G. L. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen, and. V. M. Mostepanenko