Abstract:In this paper we analyze the status of some `unbelievable results' presented in the paper `On Some Contradictory Computations in Multi-Dimensional Mathematics' [1] published in Nonlinear Analysis, a journal indexed in the Science Citation Index. Among some of the unbelievable results `proved' in the paper we can find statements like that: (i) a linear transformation which is a rotation in R^2 with rotation angle theta different from nphi/2, is inconsistent with arithmetic, (ii) complex number theory is inconsistent. Besides these 'results' of mathematical nature [1],offers also a `proof' that Special Relativity is inconsistent. Now, we are left with only two options (a) the results of [1] are correct and in this case we need a revolution in Mathematics (and also in Physics) or (b) the paper is a potpourri of nonsense. We show that option (b) is the correct one. All `proofs' appearing in [1] are trivially wrong, being based on a poor knowledge of advanced calculus notions. There are many examples (some of them discussed in [2,3,4,5,6]of complete wrong papers using nonsequitur Mathematics in the Physics literature. Taking into account also that a paper like [1] appeared in a Mathematics journal we think that it is time for editors and referees of scientific journals to become more careful in order to avoid the dissemination of nonsense.

Comment on 'Comment on 'Affine density, von Neumann dimension and a problem of Perelomov"

Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Corrigendum and improvements to “Carleman estimates, observability inequalities and null controllability for interior degenerate non smooth parabolic equations”, and its consequences

Comments on "Numerical study of the SWKB condition of novel classes of exactly solvable systems''

Comment on "Conjectures on exact solution of three-dimensional (3D) simple orthorhombic Ising lattices" [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0705.1045" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0705.1045">arXiv:0705.1045</a>]

Remarks on paper "Two-term spectral asymptotics in linear elasticity''

Corrigendum to “Linear operators, the Hurwitz zeta function and Dirichlet L-functions” [J. Number Theory 217 (2020) 422–442]

Xiaoet Al.reply:

Corrigendum to: “Lusternik–Schnirelman and Morse Theory for the Van der Waals–Cahn–Hilliard equation with volume constraint” [Nonlinear Anal. 220 (2022) 112851]

A note on stability of fractional logistic maps, Appl. Math. Lett. 125 (2022) 107787

Comment on "Hamiltonian for the Zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function"

Addendum to the Reply Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 139602 (2009), <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0811.0518" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.0518">arXiv:0811.0518</a>] on ''Dynamic Scaling of Non-Euclidean Interfaces''

Reply to "Comment on 'Fano resonance for Anderson Impurity Systems' "

A Comment on "On Some Contradictory Computations in Multi-dimensional Mathematics"

Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman

Remarks on the error term in Chebotarev Density Theorem

On the dimension of the sheets of a reductive Lie algebra

Corrigendum to "A comprehensive review of the recent numerical methods for solving FPDEs"

Reply to the Comment, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3243v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3243v1">arXiv:0810.3243v1</a> by B. Geyer, G. L. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen, and. V. M. Mostepanenko

Rejoinder on "Conjectures on exact solution of three-dimensional (3D) simple orthorhombic Ising lattices"