Abstract:Part I: The error of eq. (15b) in my article [Z.D. Zhang, Phil. Mag. 87, 5309 (2007), <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0705.1045" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0705.1045">arXiv:0705.1045</a>] in the application of the Jordan-Wigner transformation does not affect the validity of the putative exact solution, since the solution is not derived directly from it. Other objections of Perk's Comment <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0811.1802v2" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.1802v2">arXiv:0811.1802v2</a> are the same as those in Wu et al's Comments <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0811.3876" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.3876">arXiv:0811.3876</a> and <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0812.2837" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2837">arXiv:0812.2837</a>, which do not stand on solid ground and have been rejected in the previous Response <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0812.2330" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2330">arXiv:0812.2330</a>. The conjectured solution can be utilized to understand critical phenomena in various systems, while the conjectures are open to prove rigorously. Part II: This is a Reply to Perk's Rejoinder <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0901.2935" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0901.2935">arXiv:0901.2935</a>. It is shown that the basis of the objections in Perk's Rejoinder, with respect to singularities at/near infinite temperature, is based on an error that mixes the concepts of T approaching infinite and T = infinite. It is shown that the reduced free energy per site f can be used only for finite temperatures (beta > 0), not for 'exactly' infinite temperature (beta = 0). At the thermodynamic limit N approaches infinite, besides infinite-temperature zeros of Z at z = -1 for H = +/- i infinite in the limit of beta approaching zero, there exists another singularity at z = 1 for the partition function, which is usually concealed in literature by setting Z to the power of 1/N and dividing the total free energy F by N (equally, disregarding the singularity of zeros of 1/Z. The objections in Perk's Rejoinder are thoroughly disproved.

Rejoinder on "Conjectures on exact solution of three-dimensional (3D) simple orthorhombic Ising lattices"

Comment on "Conjectures on exact solution of three-dimensional (3D) simple orthorhombic Ising lattices" [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0705.1045" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0705.1045">arXiv:0705.1045</a>]

Erroneous solution of three-dimensional (3D) simple orthorhombic Ising lattices

Rejoinder to the Response <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0812.2330" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2330">arXiv:0812.2330</a> to 'Comment on a recent conjectured solution of the three-dimensional Ising model'

Comment on `Mathematical structure of the three-dimensional (3D) Ising model'

Comments concerning the Ising model and two letters by N.H. March

Comments on "upper Matrix Bounds for the Discrete Algebraic Riccati Matrix Equation" [with Author's Reply]

On some recent developments in Kähler geometry

Re-Examination of Yang-Lee Zeros of the Anisotropic Ising Models on Square, Triangular and Honeycomb Lattices

Reply to "Comment on 'Nontrivial Quantum Geometry and the Strength of Electron-Phonon Coupling',

Comment on 'Comment on 'Affine density, von Neumann dimension and a problem of Perelomov"

Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Reply to "Comment on Absence of off-diagonal long-range order in hcp $^{\bf 4}$He dislocation cores"

Counterexamples to a conjecture of Woods

Asymmetric Conical Diffraction in Dislocated Edge-Centered Square Lattices.

Site and bond percolation on four-dimensional simple hypercubic lattices with extended neighborhoods

Comments on "On Bohm trajectories in two-particle interference devices" by L. Marchildon

Reply to "Comment on 'Fano resonance for Anderson Impurity Systems' "

Reply to the Comment, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3243v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3243v1">arXiv:0810.3243v1</a> by B. Geyer, G. L. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen, and. V. M. Mostepanenko

Reply to Comments on "gapless Spin Liquid Ground State of Spin-1/2 J_1-J_2 Heisenberg Model on Square Lattices"