Response to <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0811.1802" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.1802">arXiv:0811.1802</a> "Comment on 'Conjectures on exact solution of three-dimensional (3D) Ising lattices'" by Perk and Singularities at/near infinite temperature: Reply to Perk's Rejoinder <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0901.2935" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0901.2935">arXiv:0901.2935</a>

Z.D. Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14786430902776988
2009-05-13
Abstract:Part I: The error of eq. (15b) in my article [Z.D. Zhang, Phil. Mag. 87, 5309 (2007), <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0705.1045" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0705.1045">arXiv:0705.1045</a>] in the application of the Jordan-Wigner transformation does not affect the validity of the putative exact solution, since the solution is not derived directly from it. Other objections of Perk's Comment <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0811.1802v2" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.1802v2">arXiv:0811.1802v2</a> are the same as those in Wu et al's Comments <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0811.3876" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.3876">arXiv:0811.3876</a> and <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0812.2837" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2837">arXiv:0812.2837</a>, which do not stand on solid ground and have been rejected in the previous Response <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0812.2330" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2330">arXiv:0812.2330</a>. The conjectured solution can be utilized to understand critical phenomena in various systems, while the conjectures are open to prove rigorously. Part II: This is a Reply to Perk's Rejoinder <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0901.2935" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0901.2935">arXiv:0901.2935</a>. It is shown that the basis of the objections in Perk's Rejoinder, with respect to singularities at/near infinite temperature, is based on an error that mixes the concepts of T approaching infinite and T = infinite. It is shown that the reduced free energy per site f can be used only for finite temperatures (beta > 0), not for 'exactly' infinite temperature (beta = 0). At the thermodynamic limit N approaches infinite, besides infinite-temperature zeros of Z at z = -1 for H = +/- i infinite in the limit of beta approaching zero, there exists another singularity at z = 1 for the partition function, which is usually concealed in literature by setting Z to the power of 1/N and dividing the total free energy F by N (equally, disregarding the singularity of zeros of 1/Z. The objections in Perk's Rejoinder are thoroughly disproved.
Statistical Mechanics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?