Xie and Hsu Reply

Rui-Hua Xie,Paul S. Hsu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.100.159302

IF: 8.6

2008-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by G. Van Hooydonk.Received 19 December 2007DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.159302©2008 American Physical Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Qin Et Al. Reply

Nan Qin,Emmanuelle Le Chatelier,Jing Guo,Edi Prifti,Lanjuan Li,S. Dusko Ehrlich

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14852

IF: 64.8

2015-01-01

Nature

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by J. H. Chen and H. Y. Fan.Received 22 May 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.269502© 2013 American Physical Society
Gao et al. Reply

Hong-Jun Gao,Karl Sohlberg,Z. Q. Xue,H. Y. Chen,S. M. Hou,L. P. Ma,X. W. Fang,Stephen J. Pennycook

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.87.179707

IF: 8.6

2001-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Yanming Zhao et al.Received 2 June 2001DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.179707©2001 American Physical Society
Xiang et al. reply.

H J Xiang,Bing Huang,Erjun Kan,Su-Huai Wei,X G Gong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.112.199802

IF: 8.6

2014-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by M. Amsler et al.Received 4 December 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.199802© 2014 American Physical Society
Luoet Al.reply:

Hong‐Gang Luo,Tao Xiang,X. Q. Wang,Zhixun Su,Lu Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.96.019702

IF: 8.6

2006-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Ch. Kolf et al.Received 30 October 2005DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.019702©2006 American Physical Society
Xuet Al.reply:

Shanhui Xu,Jianming Cao,Carl C. Miller,D. A. Mantell,R. J. Dwayne Miller,Yongli Gao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.77.1411

IF: 8.6

1996-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A reply to the Comment by Lian Zheng and S. Das Sarma.Received 29 March 1996DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1411©1996 American Physical Society
Li and Ho Reply:

Zhi-Yuan Li,Kai-Ming Ho

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.95.229402

IF: 8.6

2005-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by C. Sauvan and P. Lalanne.Received 7 March 2005DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.229402©2005 American Physical Society
Xu, Wang, and Hu Reply:

N Xu,L Wang,XW Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.85.4838

IF: 8.6

2000-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by William C. Moss.Received 17 November 1999DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4838©2000 American Physical Society
Yaoet Al.reply:

Ke Yao,Martin Andersson,Tomas Brage,Roger Hutton,Per Jönsson,Yaming Zou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.104.209602

IF: 8.6

2007-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Thad G. Walker and Charles J. Goebel.Received 5 February 2007DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.269304©2007 American Physical Society
Zu et al. reply:.

C Zu,Y-X Wang,D-L Deng,X-Y Chang,K Liu,P-Y Hou,H-X Yang,L-M Duan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.110.078902

IF: 8.6

2013-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by E. Amselem et al.Received 4 December 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.078902© 2013 American Physical Society
He and Hubbell Reply:

Fangliang He,Stephen P. Hubbell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.95.189804

IF: 8.6

2005-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Edith Perrier et al.Received 30 August 2005DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.189804©2005 American Physical Society
Laiet Al.reply

Ying-Cheng Lai,Zonghua Liu,Wei,Choy Heng Lai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.94.219403

IF: 8.6

2005-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Suso Kraut.Received 28 September 2004DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.219403©2005 American Physical Society
Ji, Lu, and Gao Reply:

Wei Ji,Zhong-Yi Lu,Hongjun Gao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.99.059602

IF: 8.6

2007-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by F. Schreiber et al.Received 14 June 2007DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.059602©2007 American Physical Society
Luet Al.reply:

Yonghua Lu,M. Munoz,C. S. Steplecaru,Cheng Hao,Ming Bai,N. Garcia,K. Schindler,D. Spoddig,P. Esquinazi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.98.269702

IF: 8.6

2007-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by S. Sadewasser and Th. Glatzel.Received 3 January 2007DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.269702©2007 American Physical Society
Hou<i>et al.</i>Reply:

J. G. Hou,Yang Jinlong,Wang Haiqian,Li Qunxiang,Zeng Changgan,Lin Hai,Bing Wang,D. M. Chen,Zhu Qingshi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.85.2654

IF: 8.6

2000-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by J. I. Pascual, et al.Received 10 May 2000DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2654©2000 American Physical Society
Li, Zhao, and Hu Reply:

B. Li,H. Zhao,B. Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.87.069402

IF: 8.6

2001-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Abhishek Dhar.Received 8 May 2001DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.069402©2001 American Physical Society
Dong and Li Reply

J. K. Dong,Shiyan Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.104.259702

IF: 8.6

2010-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Taichi Terashima et al.Received 14 May 2010DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.259702©2010 American Physical Society
Ji, Xiong, and Yuan Reply:

Xiangdong Ji,Xiaonu Xiong,Feng Yuan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.111.039103

IF: 8.6

2013-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comments by E. Leader and C. Lorce and A. Harindranath et al.Received 4 April 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.039103© 2013 American Physical Society
Yanet Al.reply:

X. Q. Yan,C. Lin,Z. M. Sheng,Z. Y. Guo,B. C. Liu,Y. R. Lu,J. X. Fang,J. E. Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.102.239502

IF: 8.6

2009-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Liangliang Ji et al..Received 13 February 2009DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.239502©2009 American Physical Society
Zhanget Al.reply:

Hui Zhang,Jin-Ho Choi,Yang Xu,Xiuxia Wang,Xiaofang Zhai,Bing Wang,Changgan Zeng,Jun-Hyung Cho,Zhenyu Zhang,J. G. Hou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.107.019702

IF: 8.6

2011-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Han Woong Yeom and Tae-Hwan Kim.Received 5 May 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.019702© 2011 American Physical Society
Wexleret Al.reply:

Carlos Wexler,D. J. Thouless,Ping Ao,Qian Niu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.81.4277

IF: 8.6

1998-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by E. B. Sonin.Received 9 September 1998DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4277©1998 American Physical Society