Reply to the Comment by S.E. Sebastian and N. Harrison

F. Levy,I. Sheikin,Claude Berthier,M. Horvatic,M. Takigawa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0906.4484

2009-06-24

Strongly Correlated Electrons

Abstract:no abstract for comments

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Qin Et Al. Reply

Nan Qin,Emmanuelle Le Chatelier,Jing Guo,Edi Prifti,Lanjuan Li,S. Dusko Ehrlich

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14852

IF: 64.8

2015-01-01

Nature

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by J. H. Chen and H. Y. Fan.Received 22 May 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.269502© 2013 American Physical Society
Comment on the Comment on Deformation of Quantum-Mechanics

YQ LI,ZM SHENG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/24/3/384

1995-01-01

Communications in Theoretical Physics

Abstract:This is a reply to the comment by Chung and Chung [J. Phys. A27 (1994) 5037]. We point out that the discussion there is imperfect.
Gregoryanzet Al.reply:

Eugene Gregoryanz,Russell J. Hemley,Ho-kwang Mao,R. E. Cohen,Philippe Gillet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.90.079702

IF: 8.6

2003-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Margin H. Müser and Philipp Schöffel.Received 1 November 2002DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.079702©2003 American Physical Society
Gaoet Al.reply:

H. J. Gao,K. Sohlberg,Z. Q. Xue,H. Y. Chen,S. M. Hou,L. P. Ma,X. W. Fang,S. J. Pennycook

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.87.179707

IF: 8.6

2001-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Yanming Zhao et al.Received 2 June 2001DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.179707©2001 American Physical Society
Zhu et al. Reply:

Xin-Yang Zhu,Shi Wang,Zhen-Yu Jia,Li Zhu,Qi-Yuan Li,Wei-Min Zhao,Cheng-Long Xue,Yong-Jie Xu,Zhen Ma,Jinsheng Wen,Shun-Li Yu,Jian-Xin Li,Shao-Chun Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.125.079702

IF: 8.6

2020-08-13

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Zhu et al.

physics, multidisciplinary
Wang Et Al. Reply

H. Wang,M. M. Rosario,N. A. Kurz,B. Y. Rock,M. Tian,P. T. Carrigan,Y. Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.101.229702

IF: 8.6

2008-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by V. H. Dao and L. F. Chibotaru.
Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman

James V. Zidek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/15-BA944C

2015-09-16

Abstract:Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1509.03410" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.03410">arXiv:1509.03410</a>].

Statistics Theory
Yaoet Al.reply:

Ke Yao,Martin Andersson,Tomas Brage,Roger Hutton,Per Jönsson,Yaming Zou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.104.209602

IF: 8.6

2007-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Thad G. Walker and Charles J. Goebel.Received 5 February 2007DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.269304©2007 American Physical Society
Onget Al.reply:

N. P. Ong,Yayu Wang,Lu Li,M. J. Naughton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.98.119702

IF: 8.6

2007-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Lucía Cabo, Jesús Mosqueira, and Félix Vidal.Received 6 July 2006DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.119702©2007 American Physical Society
Houet Al.reply:

J. G. Hou,Yang Jinlong,Wang Haiqian,Li Qunxiang,Zeng Changgan,Lin Hai,Bing Wang,D. M. Chen,Zhu Qingshi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.85.2654

IF: 8.6

2000-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by J. I. Pascual, et al.Received 10 May 2000DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2654©2000 American Physical Society
Wei, Zhang, and Feng Reply:

J. Wei,Y. Zhang,D. L. Feng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.103.109702

IF: 8.6

2009-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Beate Muumlller et al..
Tang, Feng, and Golubovic Reply:

Chao Tang,Shechao Feng,Leonardo Golubovic

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.74.3500

IF: 8.6

1995-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by E. H. Brandt.Received 27 January 1995DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3500©1995 American Physical Society
Dong and Li Reply

J. K. Dong,Shiyan Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.104.259702

IF: 8.6

2010-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Taichi Terashima et al.Received 14 May 2010DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.259702©2010 American Physical Society
Reply to `A comment on `The Cauchy problem of f(R) gravity''

Valerio Faraoni

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/26/16/168002

2009-06-30

Abstract:We reply to a comment by Capozziello and Vignolo about the Cauchy problem of Palatini f(R) gravity.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Anandanet Al.reply:

Jeeva Anandan,Erik Sjöqvist,Arun K. Pati,Artur Ekert,Marie Ericsson,Daniel K. L. Oi,Vlatko Vedral

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.89.268902

IF: 8.6

2002-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by R. Bhandari.Received 14 May 2001DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.268902©2002 American Physical Society
Reply to Comment on ‘quantum Principle of Relativity’

Andrzej Dragan,Artur Ekert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/acec62

2023-01-01

New Journal of Physics

Abstract:We refute criticisms by Del Santo and Horvat towards our paper "Quantum principle of relativity": most of their counterarguments can be dismissed, and the rest provides further evidence to our claims.
Reply to Yang et al.'s comment

Nguyen Ba An

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0611207

2006-11-20

Quantum Physics

Abstract:This is to reply to a recent comment by Yang, Yuan and Zhang on ``Teleportation of two-quNit entanglement: Exploiting local resorces''.
Atallah et al. reply

Bassam V. Atallah,Massimo Scanziani,Matteo Carandini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13129

IF: 64.8

2014-04-01

Nature

Abstract:Abstractreplying to S.-H. Lee, A. C. Kwan & Y. Dan 10.1038/nature13128Solving discrepancies in the literature is critical for the advancement of science, and the Comment by Lee et al.1 is thus welcome. It clarifies that there is no contradiction between the earlier study of Lee et al.2 and our study3. The disagreement is in the interpretation of the results and in the model used to fit the data.

multidisciplinary sciences
Zu et al. reply:.

C Zu,Y-X Wang,D-L Deng,X-Y Chang,K Liu,P-Y Hou,H-X Yang,L-M Duan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.110.078902

IF: 8.6

2013-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by E. Amselem et al.Received 4 December 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.078902© 2013 American Physical Society
Wonet Al.reply:

C. Won,Y. Z. Wu,N. Kurahashi,H. W. Zhao,Z. Q. Qiu,A. Scholl,A. Doran

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.94.039704

IF: 8.6

2005-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by P. J. Jensen et al.Received 19 March 2004DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.039704©2005 American Physical Society