Wei, Zhang, and Feng Reply:

J. Wei,Y. Zhang,D. L. Feng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.103.109702

IF: 8.6

2009-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Beate Muumlller et al..

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Zhu et al. Reply:

Xin-Yang Zhu,Shi Wang,Zhen-Yu Jia,Li Zhu,Qi-Yuan Li,Wei-Min Zhao,Cheng-Long Xue,Yong-Jie Xu,Zhen Ma,Jinsheng Wen,Shun-Li Yu,Jian-Xin Li,Shao-Chun Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.125.079702

IF: 8.6

2020-08-13

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Zhu et al.

physics, multidisciplinary
Chen, Gong, and Wei Reply:

Shiyou Chen,X. G. Gong,Su-Huai Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.99.159602

IF: 8.6

2007-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Changfeng Chen and Hong Sun.Received 30 May 2007DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.159602©2007 American Physical Society
Zu et al. reply:.

C Zu,Y-X Wang,D-L Deng,X-Y Chang,K Liu,P-Y Hou,H-X Yang,L-M Duan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.110.078902

IF: 8.6

2013-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by E. Amselem et al.Received 4 December 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.078902© 2013 American Physical Society
Zhanget Al.reply:

Hui Zhang,Jin-Ho Choi,Yang Xu,Xiuxia Wang,Xiaofang Zhai,Bing Wang,Changgan Zeng,Jun-Hyung Cho,Zhenyu Zhang,J. G. Hou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.107.019702

IF: 8.6

2011-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Han Woong Yeom and Tae-Hwan Kim.Received 5 May 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.019702© 2011 American Physical Society
Reply to "Comment on 'Fano resonance for Anderson Impurity Systems' "

H. G. Luo,T. Xiang,X. Q. Wang,Z. B. Su,L. Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/0504177

2005-04-07

Strongly Correlated Electrons

Abstract:In a recent Comment, Kolf et al. (cond-mat/0503669) state that our analysis of the Fano resonance for Anderson impurity systems [Luo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 92, 256602 (2004)] is incorrect. Here we want to point out that their comments are not based on firm physical results and their criticisms are unjustified and invalid.
Houet Al.reply:

D. M. Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.85.2654

IF: 8.6

2000-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by J. I. Pascual, et al.Received 10 May 2000DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2654©2000 American Physical Society
Yanet Al.reply:

X. Q. Yan,C. Lin,Z. M. Sheng,Z. Y. Guo,B. C. Liu,Y. R. Lu,J. X. Fang,J. E. Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.102.239502

IF: 8.6

2009-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Liangliang Ji et al..Received 13 February 2009DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.239502©2009 American Physical Society
Dong and Li Reply

J. K. Dong,Shiyan Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.104.259702

IF: 8.6

2010-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Taichi Terashima et al.Received 14 May 2010DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.259702©2010 American Physical Society
Reply to comment by T. Terashima et al. on "Quantum criticality and nodal superconductivity in the FeAs-based superconductor KFe$_2$As$_2$"

J. K. Dong,S. Y. Zhou,T. Y. Guan,H. Zhang,Y. F. Dai,X. Qiu,X. F. Wang,Y. He,X. H. Chen,S. Y. Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1005.3575

2010-05-20

Superconductivity

Abstract:Reply to comment by T. Terashima et al. on "Quantum criticality and nodal superconductivity in the FeAs-based superconductor KFe$_2$As$_2$"
Reply to Comment on "Nonmagnetic Impurity Resonances as a Signature of Sign-Reversal Pairing in FeAs-based Superconductors"

Degang Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1003.0375

2010-03-01

Abstract:This is a reply to the comment by Daghofer and Moreo.

Superconductivity
Rejoinder to the Response <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0812.2330" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2330">arXiv:0812.2330</a> to 'Comment on a recent conjectured solution of the three-dimensional Ising model'

F. Y. Wu,B. M. McCoy,M. E. Fisher,L. Chayes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14786430802537779

2008-12-16

Abstract:We comment on Z. D. Zhang's Response [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0812.2330" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2330">arXiv:0812.2330</a>] to our recent Comment [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0811.3876" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.3876">arXiv:0811.3876</a>] addressing the conjectured solution of the three-dimensional Ising model reported in [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0705.1045" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0705.1045">arXiv:0705.1045</a>].

Statistical Mechanics
Reply to Comment on the Paper Entitled “A New Cumulative Fatigue Damage Rule Based on Dynamic Residual S-N Curve and Material Memory Concept” by Peng Z., Huang H., Zhou J. and Li Y. Published in Metals (2018; 8(6): 456)

Zhaochun Peng,Hong-Zhong Huang,Jie Zhou,Yan-Feng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/met10010008

IF: 2.695

2019-12-20

Metals

Abstract:Dear Editors, [...]

materials science, multidisciplinary,metallurgy & metallurgical engineering
Interactive comment on “ Understanding meteorological influences on PM 2 . 5 concentrations across China : a temporal and spatial perspective ” by Ziyue

Ziyue Chen

2017-01-01

Abstract:R: Dear Referee, thanks so much for your comments, which helped us improve this manuscript a lot. We have fully revised this manuscript according to your general and detailed comments. Yes, as you pointed out, the principle of CCM and its advantages compared with the correlation analysis are not well-known to all scholars and thus a better explanation of the CCM method would be needed. Due to limited space, we did not add all details to the modified manuscript and some responses and explanations are given here according to your specific comments. Meanwhile, some other issues
Comment on "A sensitivity study of the primary correlators used to characterize chiral-magnetically-driven charge separation'' by Magdy, Nie, Ma, and Lacey

Yicheng Feng,Fuqiang Wang,Jie Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.10057

2020-09-22

Abstract:This note points out an apparent error in the publication Phys.~Lett.~B {\bf 809} (2020) 135771 by Magdy, Nie, Ma, and Lacey.

Nuclear Experiment,Nuclear Theory
Reply to "comment on `discovery of Slow Magnetic Fluctuations and Critical Slowing Down in the Pseudogap Phase of YBa_2Cu_3O_y' "

Jian Zhang,Z. F. Ding,C. Tan,K. Huang,O. O. Bernal,P. -C. Ho,G. D. Morris,A. D. Hillier,P. K. Biswas,S. P. Cottrell,H. Xiang,X. Yao,D. E. MacLaughlin,Lei Shu

2017-01-01

Abstract:We reply to the objections raised in a recent Comment (arXiv:1706.03023) regarding our observation of slow magnetic fluctuations and critical slowing down of magnetic fluctuations in the pseudogap phase of YBa_2Cu_3O_y by zero-field and longitudinal-field muon spin relaxation (arXiv:1703.06799).
Correction To: Molecular Quantification of Spider Preying on Springtails in Winter-Spring Fallow Waterlogged Paddy Fields

Sun Jiaqi,Pang Shuai,Zhejiang University,Zhu Zengrong,Cheng Jiaan,Bai Yaoyu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-020-00712-8

2021-01-01

Applied Entomology and Zoology

Abstract:In the original publication of the article, on the 3rd paragraph of results section, the following sentence.
Corrigendum: Alternative Splicing: a New Cause and Potential Therapeutic Target in Autoimmune Disease.

Pingping Ren,Luying Lu,Shasha Cai,Jianghua Chen,Weiqiang Lin,Fei Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1513491

IF: 7.3

2024-01-01

Frontiers in Immunology

Abstract:[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.713540.].
Response to "Response to 'Comment on Theoretical examination of QED Hamiltonian in relativistic molecular orbital theory'" [J. Chem. Phys. 160, 187102 (2024)]

Wenjian Liu

2024-06-24

Abstract:The Response [J. Chem. Phys. 160, 187102 (2024)] of Inoue and coworkers to my Comment [J. Chem. Phys. 160, 187101 (2024)] on their original paper [J. Chem. Phys. 159, 054105 (2023)] clarifies some points put forward in my Comment, but also raises some new issues that require further clarifications. It is believed that the present Response has settled down everything.

Chemical Physics
Chen and Itoi Reply

Wei Chen,Chigak Itoi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/9405182

1994-05-27

High Energy Physics - Theory

Abstract:We reply a Comment (hep-th/xxx) on our recent paper published in Phys Rev Lett 72 (1994) 2527-2530. We point out that the author of the Comment overlooks the highly non-trivial Chern-Simons interactions and his hand-waving arguments are totally groundless.
A close look at Jeckelmann's weak-coupling results: Reply to the Comment by Jeckelmann

G. P. Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/0401561

2004-01-28

Abstract:We are pleased to see that Jeckelmann has made many changes to the original version of his comment on our paper as a result of our response. Here is a copy of this powerful response that reveals problems in his previous results. However, since this response was written before his revised comment came out, new issues in his new comment, which will be commented if necessary, are not discussed at present. Although some changes are made in his new comment as we suggested in the response, we still see many other new and old misleading statements and results. We kindly suggest the author correct them since evidence is very compelling.

Strongly Correlated Electrons