Reply to Yang et al.'s comment

Nguyen Ba An

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0611207

2006-11-20

Quantum Physics

Abstract:This is to reply to a recent comment by Yang, Yuan and Zhang on ``Teleportation of two-quNit entanglement: Exploiting local resorces''.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Comments on 'Teleportation of two quNit entanglement: Exploiting local resources'and 'Reply to Yang et al.'s comment'

Jie Yang,Hao Yuan,Zhan-jun Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0611184

2006-11-17

Quantum Physics

Abstract:This paper includes two comments. The first one is a comment on 'Teleportation of two quNit entanglement: Exploiting local resources'. Two different efficient methods are presented to modify some details of N. Ba An's protocol, so that teleportation of two quNit entanglement can be successfully achieved in terms of the revised N. Ba An's protocol. The second one is a comment on 'Reply to Yang et al.'s comment'.
Comment on the Comment on Deformation of Quantum-Mechanics

YQ LI,ZM SHENG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/24/3/384

1995-01-01

Communications in Theoretical Physics

Abstract:This is a reply to the comment by Chung and Chung [J. Phys. A27 (1994) 5037]. We point out that the discussion there is imperfect.
Qin Et Al. Reply

Nan Qin,Emmanuelle Le Chatelier,Jing Guo,Edi Prifti,Lanjuan Li,S. Dusko Ehrlich

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14852

IF: 64.8

2015-01-01

Nature

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by J. H. Chen and H. Y. Fan.Received 22 May 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.269502© 2013 American Physical Society
Comment on "Quantum Dialogue protocol"

Chang-Ho Hong,Hyung-Jin Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0606174

2006-06-21

Abstract:In 2004, Ba An Nguyen [Phys. Lett. A 328, 6-10] has presented a Quantum Dialogue scheme for simultaneously communicating their messages. In this comment, we show that the quantum dialogue scheme is not secure against the intercept-and-resend attack and we propose a modified scheme which is secure against that attack.

Quantum Physics
Reply to Comment on "State-independent experimental test of quantum contextuality in an indivisible system"

c zu,y x wang,d l deng,x y chang,k liu,p y hou,h x yang,l m duan

2013-01-01

Abstract: This is a reply to the comment from E. Amselem et al. on our paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 150401 (2012), arXiv:1207.0059).
Comment on "scheme for Teleportation of an Unknown Atomic State Without the Bell-State Measurement"

L Ye,GC Guo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.73.016302

IF: 2.971

2006-01-01

Physical Review A

Abstract:Recently, Ye and Guo [Phys. Rev. A 70, 054303 (2004)] have presented a scheme for implementing quantum teleportation of atomic states in cavity QED. In this Comment, we show that contrary to the authors' claim, the scheme is based on Bell-state measurement.
Dong and Li Reply

J. K. Dong,Shiyan Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.104.259702

IF: 8.6

2010-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Taichi Terashima et al.Received 14 May 2010DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.259702©2010 American Physical Society
Reply to comment in <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1802.01382" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.01382">arXiv:1802.01382</a>

T. P. Xiong,L. L. Yan,F. Zhou,K. Rehan,D. F. Liang,L. Chen,W. L. Yang,Z. H. Ma,M. Feng,V. Vedral

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.02392

2018-08-05

Abstract:Here we respond to a comment [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1802.01382" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.01382">arXiv:1802.01382</a>] submitted recently on 'Experimental Verification of a Jarzynski-Related Information-Theoretic Equality by a Single Trapped Ion' PRL 120 010601 (2018). We consider that the argument is the thermalization in a quantum system, which is different from the counterpart in conventional thermodynamics.

Quantum Physics
Gao et al. Reply

Hong-Jun Gao,Karl Sohlberg,Z. Q. Xue,H. Y. Chen,S. M. Hou,L. P. Ma,X. W. Fang,Stephen J. Pennycook

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.87.179707

IF: 8.6

2001-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Yanming Zhao et al.Received 2 June 2001DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.179707©2001 American Physical Society
Reply to comment in arXiv:1802.01382

T. P. Xiong,L. L. Yan,F. Zhou,K. Rehan,D. F. Liang,L. Chen,W. L. Yang,Z. H. Ma,M. Feng,V. Vedral

2018-01-01

Abstract:Here we respond to a comment [arXiv:1802.01382] submitted recently on 'Experimental Verification of a Jarzynski-Related Information-Theoretic Equality by a Single Trapped Ion' PRL 120 010601 (2018). We consider that the argument is the thermalization in a quantum system, which is different from the counterpart in conventional thermodynamics.
Comment on "reply to Arxiv:1212.3831V1 'comment On: Magnetotransport Through Graphene Spin Valves and Its Following Works' "by Ding, Zhu, and Berakdar (Arxiv:1302.0613V1)

Yang-Bo Zhou,Ming-Wei Wu

2012-01-01

Abstract:We comment on the reply to our previous comment arXiv:1212.3831v1 (See also arXiv:1212.3831v2) by Ding, Zhu, and Berakdar (arXiv:1302.0613v1)
Reply to Comment on "Multitime Quantum Communication: Interesting But Not Counterfactual" by L. Vaidman

Robert B. Griffiths

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.056202

2024-02-02

Abstract:This is a Reply to the Comment by Vaidman in <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2306.16756" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16756">arXiv:2306.16756</a> on the paper: R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023)

Quantum Physics
Reply to "Comment on 'Nontrivial Quantum Geometry and the Strength of Electron-Phonon Coupling',

Jiabin Yu,Christopher J. Ciccarino,Raffaello Bianco,Ion Errea,Prineha Narang,B. Andrei Bernevig

2023-06-07

Abstract:This is our reply to "Comment on 'Nontrivial Quantum Geometry and the Strength of Electron-Phonon Coupling', <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2305.02340" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02340">arXiv:2305.02340</a>, J. Yu, C. J. Ciccarino, R. Bianco, I. Errea, P. Narang, B. A. Bernevig" by Prof. Pickett, which focuses on the MgB$_2$ part of our work. We show that the entirety of the criticism in Prof. Pickett's comment pertaining to our work (<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2305.02340" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02340">arXiv:2305.02340</a>) is invalid.

Superconductivity
Yaoet Al.reply:

Ke Yao,Martin Andersson,Tomas Brage,Roger Hutton,Per Jönsson,Yaming Zou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.104.209602

IF: 8.6

2007-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Thad G. Walker and Charles J. Goebel.Received 5 February 2007DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.269304©2007 American Physical Society
Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Lu-Ming Duan,Guang-Can Guo

1997-01-01

Abstract:In the comment, Zanardi and Rasetti argue that several claims in our recent letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1953, 1997) are questionable. The reply shows these claims remain true.
Reply to "comment on 'arbitrated Quantum-Signature Scheme' "

Guihua Zeng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.78.016301

IF: 2.971

2008-01-01

Physical Review A

Abstract:To reply to the Comment on our original paper entitled "Arbitrated quantum-signature scheme" [Phys. Rev. A 65, 042312 (2002)], we present more detailed presentations and proofs of the quantum-signature scheme in our paper. We feel our further investigation has shown that the original quantum-signature scheme is secure and operationally well defined. In addition, proofs illustrate that the quantum-signature scheme with unknown quantum states is also suitable in principle.
Zu et al. reply:.

C Zu,Y-X Wang,D-L Deng,X-Y Chang,K Liu,P-Y Hou,H-X Yang,L-M Duan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.110.078902

IF: 8.6

2013-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by E. Amselem et al.Received 4 December 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.078902© 2013 American Physical Society
Reply to "Comment on `Extending the laws of thermodynamics for arbitrary autonomous quantum systems'"

Cyril Elouard,Camille Lombard Latune

2023-09-15

Abstract:In his Comment [1], Philip Strasberg (PS) argues from the analysis of different examples that the framework we have presented in [2] does not recover known results of macroscopic textbook thermodynamics. Here, we show that such apparent contradictions disappear when the necessary assumptions the aforementioned known results pre-suppose are applied. Those assumptions concern the control ability of the observer, the nature of the described degree of freedom, or the scale of the systems. The ability to relax those assumptions is precisely a motivation of our framework, which can explore the capacity of quantum systems to exchange work and heat even at scales not captured by textbook thermodynamics. We take the opportunity of this reply to further expand on the use of our framework and its connections with traditional thermodynamics.

Quantum Physics
Reply to "comment on 'secure Direct Communication with A Quantum One-Time-Pad' "

FG Deng,GL Long

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.72.016302

IF: 2.971

2005-01-01

Physical Review A

Abstract:We reply to the preceding comment which focused on whether there exists a quantum privacy amplification technique for purifying the unknown single-photon states transmitted. In this Reply, we will show that quantum privacy amplification is principally possible, and a specific scheme for direct communication protocol based on single photons has been constructed and will be published elsewhere. Then the secure direct quantum communication is secure against the attack strategy in the preceeding comment by using quantum privacy amplification directly.
Ji, Xiong, and Yuan Reply:

Xiangdong Ji,Xiaonu Xiong,Feng Yuan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.111.039103

IF: 8.6

2013-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comments by E. Leader and C. Lorce and A. Harindranath et al.Received 4 April 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.039103© 2013 American Physical Society

Reply to Yang et al.'s comment

Comments on 'Teleportation of two quNit entanglement: Exploiting local resources'and 'Reply to Yang et al.'s comment'

Comment on the Comment on Deformation of Quantum-Mechanics

Qin Et Al. Reply

Comment on "Quantum Dialogue protocol"

Reply to Comment on "State-independent experimental test of quantum contextuality in an indivisible system"

Comment on "scheme for Teleportation of an Unknown Atomic State Without the Bell-State Measurement"

Dong and Li Reply

Reply to comment in <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1802.01382" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.01382">arXiv:1802.01382</a>

Gao et al. Reply

Reply to comment in arXiv:1802.01382

Comment on "reply to Arxiv:1212.3831V1 'comment On: Magnetotransport Through Graphene Spin Valves and Its Following Works' "by Ding, Zhu, and Berakdar (Arxiv:1302.0613V1)

Reply to Comment on "Multitime Quantum Communication: Interesting But Not Counterfactual" by L. Vaidman

Reply to "Comment on 'Nontrivial Quantum Geometry and the Strength of Electron-Phonon Coupling',

Yaoet Al.reply:

Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Reply to "comment on 'arbitrated Quantum-Signature Scheme' "

Zu et al. reply:.

Reply to "Comment on `Extending the laws of thermodynamics for arbitrary autonomous quantum systems'"

Reply to "comment on 'secure Direct Communication with A Quantum One-Time-Pad' "

Ji, Xiong, and Yuan Reply: