Author's Reply by S. Wang and F. L. Teixeira

Shumin Wang,F.L. Teixeira

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/lmwc.2004.827862

IF: 3

2004-01-01

IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters

Abstract:Wang and Teixeira reply to a comment (by An Ping Zhao, IEEE Microwave Wireless Comp. Lett., vol.14, no.5, p. 248-9, 2004) on their original paper (Wang and Teixeira, IEEE Microwave Wireless Comp. Lett., vol.13, p.72-4, 2003 February).

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Qin Et Al. Reply

Nan Qin,Emmanuelle Le Chatelier,Jing Guo,Edi Prifti,Lanjuan Li,S. Dusko Ehrlich

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14852

IF: 64.8

2015-01-01

Nature

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by J. H. Chen and H. Y. Fan.Received 22 May 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.269502© 2013 American Physical Society
Dong and Li Reply

J. K. Dong,Shiyan Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.104.259702

IF: 8.6

2010-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Taichi Terashima et al.Received 14 May 2010DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.259702©2010 American Physical Society
Reply to "comments on 'the Foster Reactance Theorem for Antennas and Radiation Q'"

Wen Geyi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tap.2007.891878

IF: 5.7

2007-01-01

IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation

Abstract:Presents a reply to the comment by Andersen and Berntsen (IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol.55, no.3, pt.II, p.1013-14, March 2007) on the original paper by Geyi et al. (IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol.48, p.401-8, 2000)
Zhu et al. Reply:

Xin-Yang Zhu,Shi Wang,Zhen-Yu Jia,Li Zhu,Qi-Yuan Li,Wei-Min Zhao,Cheng-Long Xue,Yong-Jie Xu,Zhen Ma,Jinsheng Wen,Shun-Li Yu,Jian-Xin Li,Shao-Chun Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.125.079702

IF: 8.6

2020-08-13

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Zhu et al.

physics, multidisciplinary
Gao et al. Reply

Hong-Jun Gao,Karl Sohlberg,Z. Q. Xue,H. Y. Chen,S. M. Hou,L. P. Ma,X. W. Fang,Stephen J. Pennycook

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.87.179707

IF: 8.6

2001-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Yanming Zhao et al.Received 2 June 2001DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.179707©2001 American Physical Society
Reply to Collins et al

Yi-Min Dong,Jia Sun,Bengobesse Biyoche Aude Andrée,Qian Chen,Bing-Yang Xu,Qing-Quan Liu,Zhou Sun,Ran Pang,Fei Chen,Anne Manyande,Taane G Clark,Jin-Ping Li,Ilkay Erdogan Orhan,Yi-Xin Li,Tao Wang,Wei Wu,Da-Wei Ye

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1407

IF: 20.999

2020-09-16

Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract:To the Editor—We thank the authors for their interest [1] in our article [2]. We have provided supplementary content in response to some of their valuable comments, which will aid the understanding of our article [2]. A number of the concerns seem to arise from potential misunderstandings of the content.

immunology,infectious diseases,microbiology
Comment on the Comment on Deformation of Quantum-Mechanics

YQ LI,ZM SHENG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/24/3/384

1995-01-01

Communications in Theoretical Physics

Abstract:This is a reply to the comment by Chung and Chung [J. Phys. A27 (1994) 5037]. We point out that the discussion there is imperfect.
Yaoet Al.reply:

Ke Yao,Martin Andersson,Tomas Brage,Roger Hutton,Per Jönsson,Yaming Zou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.104.209602

IF: 8.6

2007-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Thad G. Walker and Charles J. Goebel.Received 5 February 2007DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.269304©2007 American Physical Society
Reply to Delanghe et al, Boudin et al, and Focosi et al

Jiao Zhao,Mingzhao Xing,Peng George Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1477

IF: 20.999

2020-09-28

Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract:<span class="paragraphSection"><span>To the Editor</span>—We thank Delanghe et al [<a class="reflinks" href="#CIT0001">1</a>], Boudin et al [<a class="reflinks" href="#CIT0002">2</a>], and Daniele et al [<a class="reflinks" href="#CIT0003">3</a>] for their interest in our work and their constructive critiques, to which we reply here collectively.</span>

immunology,infectious diseases,microbiology
Authors' Reply to "Comments on 'An Analytical Surface Potential Model Accounting for the Dual-Modulation Effects in Tunnel FETs"'

Chunlei Wu,Ru Huang,Qianqian Huang,Chao Wang,Jiaxin Wang,Yangyuan Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2020.2996971

IF: 3.1

2020-01-01

IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices

Abstract:We thank Prof. Shaker [1] for his interest in the above article [2] and his positive statement in the Comments. Regarding the errors raised by Prof. Shaker, the following are our replies.
Xiang et al. reply.

H J Xiang,Bing Huang,Erjun Kan,Su-Huai Wei,X G Gong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.112.199802

IF: 8.6

2014-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by M. Amsler et al.Received 4 December 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.199802© 2014 American Physical Society
Authors' response to letter to editor

Euibeom Shin,Yifan Yu,Robert R. Bies,Murali Ramanathan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-024-09927-6

2024-05-29

Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

Abstract:Authors' Response to Letter to Editor from Hinpetch Daungsupawong and Viroj Wiwanitkit.

pharmacology & pharmacy
A response to commenter Ke Lan's comment on our paper published in Nature Communications (2023)14:5782 by J. Yan et al

Ji Yan,Jiwei Li,X. T. He,Lifeng Wang,Yaohua Chen,Feng Wang,Xiaoying Han,Kaiqiang Pan,Juxi Liang,Yulong Li,Zanyang Guan,Xiangming Liu,Xingsen Che,Zhongjing Chen,Xing Zhang,Yan Xu,Bin Li,Minging He,Hongbo Cai,Liang. Hao,Zhanjun Liu,Chunyang Zheng,Zhensheng Dai,Zhengfeng Fan,Bin Qiao,Fuquan Li,Shaoen Jiang,M. Y. Yu,Shaoping Zhu

2024-06-25

Abstract:A response to commenter Ke Lan's comment on our paper published in Nature Communications (2023)14:5782 by J. Yan et al

Plasma Physics
Xiaoet Al.reply:

Di Xiao,Junren Shi,Qian Niu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.96.099702

IF: 8.6

2006-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:The Comment by Duval et al. [PRL 96, 099701 (2006)] addresses an important, but not the main, result of our Letter [PRL 95, 137204 (2005)]. It does not contradict our results in substance, and the only objection is really on the style of approach.
Linet Al.reply:

Lin Liu,Hsin‐Fei Meng,Jow-Tsong Shy,Sheng-Fu Horng,L. S. Yu,C. H. Chen,H. H. Liaw,Chun-Ming Huang,Kang‐Yung Peng,S. A. Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.92.059702

IF: 8.6

2004-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by M. Schott.Received 29 October 2003DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.059702©2004 American Physical Society
Reply to "Comment on 'Fano resonance for Anderson Impurity Systems' "

H. G. Luo,T. Xiang,X. Q. Wang,Z. B. Su,L. Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/0504177

2005-04-07

Strongly Correlated Electrons

Abstract:In a recent Comment, Kolf et al. (cond-mat/0503669) state that our analysis of the Fano resonance for Anderson impurity systems [Luo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 92, 256602 (2004)] is incorrect. Here we want to point out that their comments are not based on firm physical results and their criticisms are unjustified and invalid.
Wei, Zhang, and Feng Reply:

J. Wei,Y. Zhang,D. L. Feng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.103.109702

IF: 8.6

2009-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by Beate Muumlller et al..
Wexleret Al.reply:

Carlos Wexler,D. J. Thouless,Ping Ao,Qian Niu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.81.4277

IF: 8.6

1998-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by E. B. Sonin.Received 9 September 1998DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4277©1998 American Physical Society
Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Lu-Ming Duan,Guang-Can Guo

1997-01-01

Abstract:In the comment, Zanardi and Rasetti argue that several claims in our recent letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1953, 1997) are questionable. The reply shows these claims remain true.
Zu et al. reply:.

C Zu,Y-X Wang,D-L Deng,X-Y Chang,K Liu,P-Y Hou,H-X Yang,L-M Duan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.110.078902

IF: 8.6

2013-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by E. Amselem et al.Received 4 December 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.078902© 2013 American Physical Society

Author's Reply by S. Wang and F. L. Teixeira

Qin Et Al. Reply

Dong and Li Reply

Reply to "comments on 'the Foster Reactance Theorem for Antennas and Radiation Q'"

Zhu et al. Reply:

Gao et al. Reply

Reply to Collins et al

Comment on the Comment on Deformation of Quantum-Mechanics

Yaoet Al.reply:

Reply to Delanghe et al, Boudin et al, and Focosi et al

Authors' Reply to "Comments on 'An Analytical Surface Potential Model Accounting for the Dual-Modulation Effects in Tunnel FETs"'

Xiang et al. reply.

Authors' response to letter to editor

A response to commenter Ke Lan's comment on our paper published in Nature Communications (2023)14:5782 by J. Yan et al

Xiaoet Al.reply:

Linet Al.reply:

Reply to "Comment on 'Fano resonance for Anderson Impurity Systems' "

Wei, Zhang, and Feng Reply:

Wexleret Al.reply:

Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Zu et al. reply:.