Abstract:Capturing CO2 out of flue gases emitted from power plants is an efficient way to alleviate the greenhouse gas effect. The commonly used method to capture CO2 is to chemically absorb it with amine solutions. The mostly used are aqueous solutions and the aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA) is an effective choice to absorb CO2 with high reaction rate. However, the regeneration energy consumption is too high to be applied into industry efficiently. The main reason is due to the high boiling point, thus the non-aqueous solvent is a good alternative. In this paper, experiment is carried out to investigate the substituteion of water by methanol as the boiling point of it is no more than 343 K. during the experiment, 30%wt MEA aqueous and non-aqueous solutions were studied to absorb CO2 and the pure CO2 gases and simulated gas mixture of 12% CO2 and 88% N2 were studied, respectively. The jacket reactor was used to control the reaction temperature and the jacket spiral cooling pipe was used to cool the outlet gases from the reactor and separate the evaporated solutions. The temperature of the cooling water is 20°C. With the gas flow meter, it is easy to control and record the gas mass flow. And the gas analyzer was used to analyze the component of the mixed outlet gas. Every reaction courses were repeated several times to validate the accuracy. After the compensation of temperature, zero and evaporation, the absorption results were achieved and the CO2 absorption rate along time was obtained and absorption capacities in aqueous and nonaqueous solutions were easily observed. The results show that when the gas is pure CO2, the reaction rates for MEA aqueous solution is higher than that of non-aqueous solution at first, however, the different gap is little. Then after about 15 min, the reaction rate for MEA non-aqueous solution becomes higher than that of aqueous one as its reaction rate decreases. And the absorption capacity of non-aqueous solution is almost 0.1 mol CO2/mol MEA higher than that of aqueous solution. For the mixed gases, the reaction process is much lower than that of the pure CO2 gas. The results show that during the reaction process, the reaction rate of CO2 absorbing in non-aqueous solution is higher than that of aqueous and the CO2 absorption capacity in non-aqueous solution is also larger than that of aqueous. Also, the reaction time for pure CO2 is about 50min and for mixed gas is about 140min. Hence, the non-aqueous solutions have better CO2 absorption performance than the aqueous ones. Also, regeneration experiments were performed and the results show that the temperature ranges of 60-70°C are suitable for the CO2 loaded MEA-methanol solutions. When the temperature is higher than 70°C, methanol is preferable to be evaporated than the CO2 to be regenerated. Thus, the suitable regeneration temperature for MEA-methanol solution is no more than 70°C, which can reduce a large amount of energy in CO2 regeneration process. However, the obvious disadvantage for the non-aqueous solution is that the evaporation of the solution (methanol)

Experimental Study on Absorption of Carbon Dioxide in Flue Gas by Monoethanolamine Fine Spray

Comparison of Capture Efficiencies of Carbon Dioxide by Fine Spray of Aqueous Ammonia and MEA Solution

Study on the Mass Transfer Process of Carbon Dioxide Absorption into Monoethanolamine in Flue Gas

Experimental Studies on Removal of Carbon Dioxide by Aqueous Ammonia Fine Spray

Experiment Study on CO 2 Absorption and Desorption in the Non-Aqueous Blended Solutions of MEA and Methanol

Absorption and Regeneration Characteristics of Alkanolamines after CO2removal from Flue Gas

Experiment of CO_2 Separation from Flue Gases by Membrane Gas Absorption

Experimental Study on a New High-Efficiency Aqueous Solvent Based on a Blend of N-MethyDiEthanolAmine and TriEthylene TetrAmine for the CO2 Capture

Selection of Blended Solvents for CO2 Absorption from Coal-Fired Flue Gas. Part 1: Monoethanolamine (Mea)-Based Solvents

Experimental Study and Modified Modeling on Effect of SO2 on CO2 Absorption Using Amine Solution

Comparison of Removal Efficiencies of Carbon Dioxide Between Aqueous Ammonia and NaOH Solution in a Fine Spray Column

Simulation of CO2 capture using ammonia scrubbing: A comparison with MEA scrubbing

Experiments Study of Absorption Solution Performance of CO2 Sequestration in Flue Gas Using Membrane Absorption

Experimental Study of the Absorption and Regeneration Performance of Several Candidate Solvents for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture

Experimental studies on CO2 capture in a spray scrubber using NaOH solution

Experimental and Modeling Study of Trace CO2 Removal in a Hollow-Fiber Membrane Contactor, Using CO2-Loaded Monoethanolamine

Thermal Degradation of Monoethanolamine in CO 2 Capture with Acidic Impurities in Flue Gas

Removal of CO2 from Simulated Flue Gas of Power Plants by Membrane-Based Gas Absorption Processes

Chemical Absorption Kinetics in MEA Solution with Nano-particles

Absorption of Carbon Dioxide into Aqueous Blend of Monoethanolamine and 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium Tetrafluoroborate

MEA-based CO2 capture: a study focuses on MEA concentrations and process parameters