Atomic-scale investigation of γ-Ga2O3 deposited on MgAl2O4 and its relationship with β-Ga2O3
Jingyu Tang,Kunyao Jiang,Chengchao Xu,Matthew J. Cabral,Kelly Xiao,Lisa M. Porter,Robert F. Davis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0180922
IF: 6.6351
2024-01-01
APL Materials
Abstract:Nominally phase-pure γ-Ga2O3 was deposited on (100) MgAl2O4 within a narrow temperature window centered at ∼470 °C using metal-organic chemical vapor deposition. The film deposited at 440 °C exhibited either poor crystallization or an amorphous structure; the film grown at 500 °C contained both β-Ga2O3 and γ-Ga2O3. A nominally phase-pure β-Ga2O3 film was obtained at 530 °C. Atomic-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) investigations of the γ-Ga2O3 film grown at 470 °C revealed a high density of antiphase boundaries. A planar defect model developed for γ-Al2O3 was extended to explain the stacking sequences of the Ga sublattice observed in the STEM images of γ-Ga2O3. The presence of the 180° rotational domains and 90° rotational domains of β-Ga2O3 inclusions within the γ-Ga2O3 matrix is discussed within the context of a comprehensive investigation of the epitaxial relationship between those two phases in the as-grown film at 470 °C and the same film annealed at 600 °C. The results led to the hypotheses that (i) incorporation of certain dopants, including Si, Ge, Sn, Mg, Al, and Sc, into β-Ga2O3 locally stabilizes the “γ-phase” and (ii) the site preference(s) for these dopants promotes the formation of “γ-phase” and/or γ-Ga2O3 solid solutions. However, in the absence of such dopants, pure γ-Ga2O3 remains the least stable Ga2O3 polymorph, as indicated by its very narrow growth window, lower growth temperatures relative to other Ga2O3 polymorphs, and the largest calculated difference in Helmholtz free energy per formula unit between γ-Ga2O3 and β-Ga2O3 than all other polymorphs.
materials science, multidisciplinary,physics, applied,nanoscience & nanotechnology