Abstract:Statement of problem. Intraoral scanning has benefits over conventional impression making, but whether scanning is sufficiently accurate for multiple implants is unclear.Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the trueness of digital scans acquired by using intraoral scanners from a small range to a complete arch with the conventional impression technique and to determine the influence of 2 different evaluation methods (best -fit algorithm versus absolute linear deviation) on the outcomes of accuracy assessment.Material and methods. A mandibular model with 8 implants (A-H) around an edentulous arch was used as the master model. Open-format standard tessellation language (STL) data sets (1 reference file from a highly accurate dental laboratory scanner, 10 files from an intraoral scanner, and 10 files from digitized conventional impressions at room temperature) were imported to a metrology software program, and 5 groups of scanning ranges (AB, FGH, CDEF, BCDEFG, and ABCDEFGH) were identified simulating different clinical situations. Two evaluation methods -root mean square values calculated from the best -fit algorithm and average value of linear discrepancies from absolute linear deviation -were used to describe the trueness values. The impacts of different scanning or impression methods, ranges, and evaluation methods were tested by using a 3-way ANOVA. The effect of the scanning range on accuracy was further identified with 1-way ANOVA. The paired-sample t test was used to determine the differences of trueness values between the 2 methods in different groups.Results. The trueness values of the implant impressions were significantly affected by different scanning or impression methods (P<.001), evaluation methods (P<.001), and scanning ranges (P<.001) as independent variables. With use of the best -fit algorithm, deviations from the digital scans were significantly greater than those from the conventional impressions in cross -arch situations (groups CDEF, BCDEFG, and ABCDEFGH). With use of the absolute linear deviation method, statistically significant lower accuracy was found when larger areas were encountered (groups BCDEFG and ABCDEFGH). Use of the absolute linear deviation method resulted in a higher mean score of inaccuracy than that from the best -fit algorithm method in most situations.Conclusions. Scanning or impression methods, ranges, and evaluation methods affected the dimensional accuracy (trueness) of scans or impressions with multiple implants. Digital scans had worse trueness values compared with those made with the conventional splinting open-tray technique when cross-arch implant impressions were acquired. (J Prosthet Dent 2022;128:1017-23)

Reliability of a 3D spot laser scanner for orthodontic applications

Reliability of a 3D Spot Laser Scanner for Orthodontic Applications

Reliability of a newly designed dental cast laser scanner

Accuracy evaluation of 3D-printed dental models used for the fabrication of clear aligners in mild malocclusions

The Reliability Study of Three-Dimensional Dental Cast Laser Scanner and Comparison with Manual Measurement

[The Study on Three-Dimensional Laser Scanning of Dental Model and Computer Aided Set-Up].

Accuracy (trueness and precision) of 3D printed orthodontic models finalized to clear aligners production, testing crowded and spaced dentition

Reproducibility of linear measurements performed in dental models from 3D printing

[Accuracy and reproducibility of intraoral scanning in vivo]

[Quantitative Evaluation for the Accuracy of Dental Model Three-Dimensional Scanner].

Evaluation of the Quality of Three-Dimensional Data Acquired by Using Two Kinds of Structure Light Intra-Oral Scanner to Scan the Crown Preparation Model

A Method to Evaluate the Trueness of Reconstructed Dental Models Made with Photo-Curing 3D Printing Technologies

Accuracy of different tooth surfaces on 3D printed dental models: orthodontic perspective

[A Study on the Stability and Reliability of 3D Laser Cranio-Maxillofacial Reconstruction].

Accuracy of Impressions for Multiple Implants: A Comparative Study of Digital and Conventional Techniques

Spatial Trueness Evaluation of 3D-Printed Dental Model Made of Photopolymer Resin: Use of Special Structurized Dental Model

Accuracy and reliability of measurements performed using two different software programs on digital models generated using laser and computed tomography plaster model scanners

A Comparison of Full Arch Trueness and Precision of Nine Intra-Oral Digital Scanners and Four Lab Digital Scanners

Consistency of Peer Assessment Rating Index by Computer 3D Digital Measurement and Manual Measurement

Impact of Orthodontic Brackets on the Intraoral Scan Data Accuracy

Quantitative Evaluation Of Three-Dimensional Facial Scanners Measurement Accuracy For Facial Deformity