Abstract:Statement of problem. Intraoral scanning has benefits over conventional impression making, but whether scanning is sufficiently accurate for multiple implants is unclear.Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the trueness of digital scans acquired by using intraoral scanners from a small range to a complete arch with the conventional impression technique and to determine the influence of 2 different evaluation methods (best -fit algorithm versus absolute linear deviation) on the outcomes of accuracy assessment.Material and methods. A mandibular model with 8 implants (A-H) around an edentulous arch was used as the master model. Open-format standard tessellation language (STL) data sets (1 reference file from a highly accurate dental laboratory scanner, 10 files from an intraoral scanner, and 10 files from digitized conventional impressions at room temperature) were imported to a metrology software program, and 5 groups of scanning ranges (AB, FGH, CDEF, BCDEFG, and ABCDEFGH) were identified simulating different clinical situations. Two evaluation methods -root mean square values calculated from the best -fit algorithm and average value of linear discrepancies from absolute linear deviation -were used to describe the trueness values. The impacts of different scanning or impression methods, ranges, and evaluation methods were tested by using a 3-way ANOVA. The effect of the scanning range on accuracy was further identified with 1-way ANOVA. The paired-sample t test was used to determine the differences of trueness values between the 2 methods in different groups.Results. The trueness values of the implant impressions were significantly affected by different scanning or impression methods (P<.001), evaluation methods (P<.001), and scanning ranges (P<.001) as independent variables. With use of the best -fit algorithm, deviations from the digital scans were significantly greater than those from the conventional impressions in cross -arch situations (groups CDEF, BCDEFG, and ABCDEFGH). With use of the absolute linear deviation method, statistically significant lower accuracy was found when larger areas were encountered (groups BCDEFG and ABCDEFGH). Use of the absolute linear deviation method resulted in a higher mean score of inaccuracy than that from the best -fit algorithm method in most situations.Conclusions. Scanning or impression methods, ranges, and evaluation methods affected the dimensional accuracy (trueness) of scans or impressions with multiple implants. Digital scans had worse trueness values compared with those made with the conventional splinting open-tray technique when cross-arch implant impressions were acquired. (J Prosthet Dent 2022;128:1017-23)

[Quantitative Evaluation for the Accuracy of Dental Model Three-Dimensional Scanner].

Spatial Trueness Evaluation of 3D-Printed Dental Model Made of Photopolymer Resin: Use of Special Structurized Dental Model

Evaluation of the Quality of Three-Dimensional Data Acquired by Using Two Kinds of Structure Light Intra-Oral Scanner to Scan the Crown Preparation Model

Quantitative evaluation of the measurement accuracy of 2 three-dimensional facial scanners

Quantitative Evaluation Of Three-Dimensional Facial Scanners Measurement Accuracy For Facial Deformity

[Quantitative Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Accuracy of Edentulous Models in Centric Relation].

A Method to Evaluate the Trueness of Reconstructed Dental Models Made with Photo-Curing 3D Printing Technologies

Evaluation of the accuracy of a common regional registration method for three-dimensional reconstruction of edentulous jaw relation by a 7-axis three-dimensional measuring system.

Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Digital Models Formulated From Direct Intra-oral Scanning of Dental Arches in Comparison With Extra-oral Scanning of Poured Dental Models in Terms of Dimensional Accuracy and Reliability

A new method for the evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch digital impressions in vitro

[Accuracy and reproducibility of intraoral scanning in vivo]

Scanning Accuracy of 10 Intraoral Scanners for Single-crown and Three-unit Fixed Denture Preparations: an in Vitro Study.

Evaluation of the accuracy of three-dimensional reconstruction of edentulous model jaw relation based on dental articulator positioning

[Quantitative Study of Intraoral Scanners' Accuracy].

Accuracy of Impressions for Multiple Implants: A Comparative Study of Digital and Conventional Techniques

[Evaluation of Measurement Accuracy of Three Facial Scanners Based on Different Scanning Principles].

[The Study on Three-Dimensional Laser Scanning of Dental Model and Computer Aided Set-Up].

Study on precision of application of intraoral scanning digitized model into evaluation on region of gingival parenchyma in pa-tients with chronic periodontitis

Evaluation of the quantitative accuracy of 3D reconstruction of edentulous jaw models with jaw relation based on reference point system alignment

Accuracy evaluation of 3D-printed dental models used for the fabrication of clear aligners in mild malocclusions

Accuracy of different tooth surfaces on 3D printed dental models: orthodontic perspective