Abstract:OBJECTIVE To provide a reference for using intraoral scanners for making clinical diagnostic dentures of edentulous jaws by comparing the accuracy of three intraoral scanners for primary impression and jaw relation record of edentulous jaws. METHODS This study contained 6 primary impressions of the edentulous patients. Each of the impressions consisted of the maxillary primary impression, the mandibular primary impression and the jaw relation record. For each of them, a dental cast scanner (Dentscan Y500) was used to obtain stereolithography (STL) data as reference scan, and then three intraoral scanners including i500, Trios 3 and CEREC Primescan were used for three times to obtain STL data as experiment groups. In Geomagic Studio 2013 software, trueness was obtained by comparing experiment groups with the reference scan, and the precision was obtained from intragroup comparisons. Registered maxillary data of the intraoral scan with reference scan, the morphological error of jaw relation record was obtained by comparing jaw relation record of the intraoral scan with the reference scan. Registered mandibular data with jaw relation record of intraoral scan and the displacement of the jaw position were evaluated. Independent samples t test and Mann-Whitney U test in the SPSS 20.0 statistical software were used to statistically analyze the trueness, precision and morphological error of jaw relation record of three intraoral scanners. The Bland-Altman diagram was used to evaluate the consistency of the jaw relationship measured by the three intraoral scanners. RESULTS The trueness of i500, Trios 3 and CEREC Primescan scanners was (182.34±101.21) μm, (145.21±71.73) μm, and (78.34±34.79) μm for maxilla; (106.42±21.63) μm, and 95.08 (63.08) μm, (78.45±42.77) μm for mandible. There was no significant difference in trueness of the three scanners when scanning the maxilla and mandible(P>0.05). The precision of the three scanners was 147.65 (156.30) μm, (147.54±83.33) μm, and 40.30 (32.80) μm for maxilla; (90.96±30.77) μm, (53.73±23.56) μm, and 37.60 (93.93) μm for mandible. The precision of CEREC Primescan scanner was significantly better than that of the other two scanners for maxilla (P<0.05). Trios 3 and CEREC Primescan scanners were significantly better than i500 scanner for mandible (P<0.05). The precision of the i500 and Trios 3 scanners for mandible was superior to maxilla (P<0.05). The upper limit of 95% confidence intervals of trueness and precision of three scanners for both maxilla and mandible were within ±300 μm which was clinically accepted. The morphological error of jaw relation record of the three scanners was (337.68±128.54) μm, (342.89±195.41) μm, and (168.62±88.35) μm. The 95% confidence intervals of i500 and Trios 3 scanners were over 300 μm. CEREC Primescan scanner was significantly superior to i500 scanner(P<0.05).The displacement of the jaw position of the three scanners was (0.83±0.56) mm, (0.80±0.45) mm, and (0.91±0.75) mm for vertical dimension; (0.79±0.58) mm, (0.62±0.18) mm, and (0.53±0.53) mm for anterior and posterior directions; (0.95±0.59) mm, (0.69±0.45) mm, and (0.60±0.22) mm for left and right directions. The displacement of the jaw position of the three scanners in vertical dimension, anterior and posterior directions and the left and right directions were within the 95% consistency limit. CONCLUSION Three intraoral scanners showed good trueness and precision. The i500 and Trios 3 scanners had more errors in jaw relation record, but they were used as primary jaw relation record. It is suggested that three intraoral scanners can be used for obtaining digital data to make diagnostic dentures and individual trays, reducing possible deforming or crack when sending impressions from clinic to laboratory.

Evaluation of the accuracy of a common regional registration method for three-dimensional reconstruction of edentulous jaw relation by a 7-axis three-dimensional measuring system.

Evaluation of the accuracy of three-dimensional reconstruction of edentulous model jaw relation based on dental articulator positioning

Evaluation of the quantitative accuracy of 3D reconstruction of edentulous jaw models with jaw relation based on reference point system alignment

Accuracy of dental implant surgery with robotic position feedback and registration algorithm: An <i>in</i>-<i>vitro</i> study

[Quantitative Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Accuracy of Edentulous Models in Centric Relation].

Accuracy Evaluation of a New Three-Dimensional Reproduction Method of Edentulous Dental Casts, and Wax Occlusion Rims with Jaw Relation.

Evaluating the Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Intercuspal Position for Dentition Casts Aided by a Mechanical Appliance

Comparison of the Registration Methods for the Three-Dimensional Facial Scans Applied to the Design of Full-Arch Implant Supported Restoration

Digital Determination and Recording of Edentulous Maxillomandibular Relationship Using a Jaw Movement Tracking System

[Accuracy of Different Registration Methods for Laser-Scanned Dental Cast Data and Maxillofacial Cone-Bean CT Data].

Accuracy of Recording Edentulous Arch Relations Using an Optical Jaw-Tracking System: an in Vitro Study

Quantitative Evaluation of Edentulous Maxillomandibular Relationship Record Using Diagnostic Complete Dentures Fabricated by CAD and 3D Printing

Accuracy of intercuspal occlusion in 3D reconstruction of three dental cast scanning systems

Quantitative Evaluation Of Three-Dimensional Facial Scanners Measurement Accuracy For Facial Deformity

[Quantitative Evaluation for the Accuracy of Dental Model Three-Dimensional Scanner].

Optimum design of reference points distribution in three-dimensional reconstruction of dental model in intercuspal position

[Accuracy of Three Intraoral Scans for Primary Impressions of Edentulous Jaws].

A Pilot Study of Digital Recording of Edentulous Jaw Relations Using a Handheld Scanner and Specially Designed Headgear

Comparison of the Accuracy (trueness and Precision) of Virtual Dentofacial Patients Digitized by Three Different Methods Based on 3D Facial and Dental Images

Coordinate-based data analysis of the accuracy of five intraoral scanners for scanning completely dentate and partially edentulous mandibular arches

The Accuracy of a Three-Dimensional Face Model Reconstructing Method Based on Conventional Clinical Two-Dimensional Photos