Abstract:In contemporary dentistry, several 3D printing techniques, including a stereolithography apparatus (SLA), digital light processing (DLP), liquid crystal display (LCD), and PolyJet 3D inkjet printing technology (PolyJet), are employed for model production. Despite their widespread use, there remains a paucity of the literature regarding the trueness and precision of these devices in dental applications. Existing studies comparing the accuracy of dental models manufactured by different printing technologies yield disparate conclusions regarding dental prosthesis manufacturing. This study aimed to test two null hypotheses: first, that the trueness of various new-generation 3D printers is equivalent, and second, that the trueness of printing by these printers is sufficient for achieving high-precision mastercasts in dental prosthodontics manufacturing. The research focuses on evaluating the trueness of five contemporary dental 3D printers: Anycubic Mono X 6Ks (Hongkong Anycubic Technology Co., Hongkong, China), Asiga Max (Asiga, Sydney, Australia), Creo C5 (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland), Form 3B (Formlabs, Boston, MA, USA), and J5 Dentajet (Stratasys Ltd., Eden Prairie, MN, USA). The methodology employed involved the creation of a digital test object using Blender software, adhering meticulously to the dimensions outlined in ISO standard 20896-1. These dimensions were chosen to be both relevant for this study and representative of clinical scenarios. Subsequently, the test object was printed and precise measurements were conducted utilizing a metrology-type Nikon XTH225 ST Reflection target in conjunction with VGStudio MAX analysis software. The results of our investigation revealed clinically negligible deviations in ball dimensions across all printers, with the maximum observed deviations ranging between 1.17% and 2.03% (notably observed in the Creo C5 printer). Transversal distortion exhibited variance based on the linear accuracy of each printer, with Stratasys21 and Formlabs 3B demonstrating superior accuracy among the evaluated printers. Distortions in the analyzed dimensions (specifically, anterior b-c, posterior a-d, and oblique a-c) were found to be uniform. In conclusion, while the first null hypothesis was rejected, indicating variations in trueness among the 3D printers assessed, our findings affirm the suitability of all five analyzed 3D printers for clinical applications. Consequently, these printers can be utilized for the fabrication of high-precision mastercasts in dental prosthodontics manufacturing.

A Method to Evaluate the Trueness of Reconstructed Dental Models Made with Photo-Curing 3D Printing Technologies

Spatial Trueness Evaluation of 3D-Printed Dental Model Made of Photopolymer Resin: Use of Special Structurized Dental Model

Digital measurement method for comparing the absolute marginal discrepancy of three-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses fabricated using conventional and digital technologies

The Evaluation of the Trueness of Dental Mastercasts Obtained through Different 3D Printing Technologies

Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions

Quantitative Evaluation of Printing Accuracy of Multi-Color and Multi-Hardness Three-Dimensional Printing Dental Model with Photopolymer Jetting

Accuracy (trueness and precision) of 3D printed orthodontic models finalized to clear aligners production, testing crowded and spaced dentition

Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Models for Three-Unit Prostheses Fabricated by Various 3D Printing Technologies

[Fabrication and Accuracy Research on 3D Printing Dental Model Based on Cone Beam Computed Tomography Digital Modeling].

Evaluation of current additive manufacturing systems for orthodontic 3-dimensional printing

Accuracy of 3D-Printed Dental Models of Different Tooth Surfaces

[Quantitative Evaluation for the Accuracy of Dental Model Three-Dimensional Scanner].

Accuracy of full arch three-dimensional dentition models from intraoral scanners

Evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of 3D digital dental models with laser scanning

Accuracy of different tooth surfaces on 3D printed dental models: orthodontic perspective

Accuracy of maxillofacial prototypes fabricated by different 3-dimensional printing technologies using multi-slice and cone-beam computed tomography

Accuracy of five different 3D printing workflows for dental models comparing industrial and dental desktop printers

Accuracy evaluation of 3D-printed dental models used for the fabrication of clear aligners in mild malocclusions

Trueness of five different 3D printing systems including budget- and professional-grade printers: An In vitro study

Accuracy Evaluation of a New Three-Dimensional Reproduction Method of Edentulous Dental Casts, and Wax Occlusion Rims with Jaw Relation.

Accuracy of digital light processing printing of 3-dimensional dental models