Abstract:BACKGROUND: The study's objective was to assess the dimensional accuracy and reliability of dental digital models prepared by direct intraoral scanning and indirect scanning of the plaster models compared to the plaster models as the gold standard.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 20 patients. Nine had a class I malocclusion, seven had a class II malocclusion, and four had a class III malocclusion. Intraoral scanning was done for the upper and lower arches of all the patients enrolled in this study using an intraoral scanner (i700; Medit, Seoul, Korea). The next step was preparing the plaster model for the control group. Addition-silicone impressions were taken for each patient's arches. The impressions were poured according to American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) standards. Finally, the digital models of the indirect scanning group were prepared using a 3D desktop scanner (T710; Medit). In total, 26 measurements were made on the plaster and digital models. Paired t-tests were used to test for significant differences between the studied groups. The reliability of the studied techniques was tested using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Because of the multiple comparisons, the ɑ level was adjusted and set at 0.002.RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the intraoral scanning group (20 patients) and the plaster models group (20 patients; P>0.002). The ICCs ranged from 0.814 to 0.993, indicating excellent agreement between the direct digital and traditional plaster models. There were no significant differences between the digital and original plaster models (P>0.002). ICCs ranged from 0.834 to 0.995, indicating excellent agreement between the indirect digital and original plaster models. No significant differences were detected between the direct and indirect digital models (P>0.002). ICCs ranged between 0.813 and 0.999, indicating excellent agreement between direct and indirect digital models.CONCLUSION: Both direct and indirect scanning techniques are accurate and reliable for digital model preparation and can be considered an alternative to traditional plaster models used in clinical orthodontics diagnostic applications. The intraoral scanning technique can be considered a valid alternative for indirect scanning of the plaster models to prepare digital working models during the digital design and fabrication of orthodontic appliances such as clear aligners.

Accuracy of digital light processing printing of 3-dimensional dental models

Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions

Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy

Evaluation of current additive manufacturing systems for orthodontic 3-dimensional printing

Quantitative Evaluation of Printing Accuracy of Multi-Color and Multi-Hardness Three-Dimensional Printing Dental Model with Photopolymer Jetting

Comparison in Terms of Accuracy between DLP and LCD Printing Technology for Dental Model Printing

Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Models for Three-Unit Prostheses Fabricated by Various 3D Printing Technologies

Effect of Build Angle and Layer Height on the Accuracy of 3-Dimensional Printed Dental Models.

Optimization of three-dimensional printing parameters for orthodontic applications

Accuracy (trueness and precision) of 3D printed orthodontic models finalized to clear aligners production, testing crowded and spaced dentition

Spatial Trueness Evaluation of 3D-Printed Dental Model Made of Photopolymer Resin: Use of Special Structurized Dental Model

Accuracy of 3-Dimensionally Printed Full-Arch Dental Models: A Systematic Review

Accuracy evaluation of 3D-printed dental models used for the fabrication of clear aligners in mild malocclusions

Accuracy of five different 3D printing workflows for dental models comparing industrial and dental desktop printers

Dimensional accuracy and surface characteristics of complete-arch cast manufactured by six 3D printers

Effect of 3D printing technology and print orientation on the trueness of additively manufactured definitive casts with different tooth preparations

Accuracy of Multi-Implant Impressions Using 3D-Printing Custom Trays and Splinting Versus Conventional Techniques for Complete Arches.

Dimensional Accuracy Evaluation of Temporary Dental Restorations with Different 3D Printing Systems

Comparing the accuracy of 3 different liquid crystal display printers for dental model printing

Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Digital Models Formulated From Direct Intra-oral Scanning of Dental Arches in Comparison With Extra-oral Scanning of Poured Dental Models in Terms of Dimensional Accuracy and Reliability

Effect of Model Body Type and Print Angle on the Accuracy of 3D-Printed Orthodontic Models