Abstract:BACKGROUND: The study's objective was to assess the dimensional accuracy and reliability of dental digital models prepared by direct intraoral scanning and indirect scanning of the plaster models compared to the plaster models as the gold standard.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 20 patients. Nine had a class I malocclusion, seven had a class II malocclusion, and four had a class III malocclusion. Intraoral scanning was done for the upper and lower arches of all the patients enrolled in this study using an intraoral scanner (i700; Medit, Seoul, Korea). The next step was preparing the plaster model for the control group. Addition-silicone impressions were taken for each patient's arches. The impressions were poured according to American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) standards. Finally, the digital models of the indirect scanning group were prepared using a 3D desktop scanner (T710; Medit). In total, 26 measurements were made on the plaster and digital models. Paired t-tests were used to test for significant differences between the studied groups. The reliability of the studied techniques was tested using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Because of the multiple comparisons, the ɑ level was adjusted and set at 0.002.RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the intraoral scanning group (20 patients) and the plaster models group (20 patients; P>0.002). The ICCs ranged from 0.814 to 0.993, indicating excellent agreement between the direct digital and traditional plaster models. There were no significant differences between the digital and original plaster models (P>0.002). ICCs ranged from 0.834 to 0.995, indicating excellent agreement between the indirect digital and original plaster models. No significant differences were detected between the direct and indirect digital models (P>0.002). ICCs ranged between 0.813 and 0.999, indicating excellent agreement between direct and indirect digital models.CONCLUSION: Both direct and indirect scanning techniques are accurate and reliable for digital model preparation and can be considered an alternative to traditional plaster models used in clinical orthodontics diagnostic applications. The intraoral scanning technique can be considered a valid alternative for indirect scanning of the plaster models to prepare digital working models during the digital design and fabrication of orthodontic appliances such as clear aligners.

Reproducibility of linear measurements performed in dental models from 3D printing

Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions

Evaluation of the agreement of horizontal and vertical linear measurements obtained from digital models, printed models and direct measurements

Comparative Study of Concordance of Digital Models, Plaster Models, and 3D Printed Filament Models with Clinical Measurements in Children

Evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of 3D digital dental models with laser scanning

Accuracy of 3D printed scan bodies for dental implants using two additive manufacturing systems: An in vitro study

Evaluation of current additive manufacturing systems for orthodontic 3-dimensional printing

Accuracy evaluation of 3D-printed dental models used for the fabrication of clear aligners in mild malocclusions

Comparison of intraoral scanning and CBCT to generate digital and 3D-printed casts by fused deposition modeling and digital light processing

Accuracy (trueness and precision) of 3D printed orthodontic models finalized to clear aligners production, testing crowded and spaced dentition

Accuracy Analysis of Digital Models from Intraoral Scanners and 3D-Printed Casts in Children and Teenagers

Study of scanning repeatability of intraoral digital impressions

An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Digital Models-An In Vitro Study

Accuracy of five different 3D printing workflows for dental models comparing industrial and dental desktop printers

Accuracy of digital light processing printing of 3-dimensional dental models

[Accuracy and reproducibility of intraoral scanning in vivo]

Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Digital Models Formulated From Direct Intra-oral Scanning of Dental Arches in Comparison With Extra-oral Scanning of Poured Dental Models in Terms of Dimensional Accuracy and Reliability

Accuracy and reliability of measurements performed using two different software programs on digital models generated using laser and computed tomography plaster model scanners

Accuracy of different tooth surfaces on 3D printed dental models: orthodontic perspective

Reliability and intra-examiner agreement of orthodontic model analysis with a digital caliper on plaster and printed dental models

Comparison of Tooth Size Measurements in Orthodontics Using Conventional and 3D Digital Study Models