Abstract:Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D) digital facial photographs taken by the Bellus3D Face Camera Pro (Bellus3D) (Bellus3D Inc, Los Gatos, Calif) and the 3dMDface system (3dMD) (3dMD Inc, Atlanta, Ga) with one another and with direct anthropometry (DA). Methods: A mannequin head was selected as the research object. Twenty facial landmarks were labeled on the basis of the 8 interlandmark distances and 5 angles that were defined. A 150-mm digital Vernier caliper (Mitutoyo Inc, Tokyo, Japan) with an accuracy of 0.02 mm was applied to directly measure the interlandmark distances, and the angles were calculated according to the law of cosines. All the measurements were conducted 3 times by each operator under identical conditions. Then, each scanner was used to acquire 3D photographs 5 times, generating 10 digital stereophotographs. Linear distances and angles were measured on the 3D facial photographs reconstructed with open-source MeshLab software (ISTI [Italian National Research Council], Rome, Italy). Each linear distance and angle were measured 3 times by 1 operator, and 3 examiners conducted the measurements independently. To obtain the trueness, equivalence tests were applied to compare the measurements of the 2 scanners and DA. In addition, the average absolute deviations were calculated to directly compare the trueness of 3 methods (Bellus3D vs 3dMD vs DA). Finally, the intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess the interobserver agreement and the precision of 2 scanners. Results: As for the trueness, 7 out of 8 of the linear distance measurements (N-Pn, Sn-Pog, ORE-IRE, OLE-ILE, RLC-RMC, LLC-LMC, and CR-CL) and 3 out of 5 of the angular measurements (MLA, NFA, and INI) obtained by 3dMD were equivalent to those obtained by DA. Five out of 8 measurements (N-Pn, Sn-Pog, RLC-RMC, LLC-LMC, and CR-CL) and 1 out of 5 of the angular measurements (MLA) obtained by Bellus3D were equivalent to the measurements obtained with DA. All but 3 of the measurements (ORE-IRE, NFA, and INI) obtained with Bellus3D were equivalent to 3dMD. The mean absolute difference between 3dMD and DA was 0.36 +/- 0.20 mm and 0.45 degrees +/- 0.56 degrees; the deviation between Bellus3D and DA was 0.61 +/- 0.47 mm and 0.99 degrees +/- 0.61 degrees; and the deviation between Bellus3D and 3dMD was 0.38 +/- 0.37 mm and 0.62 degrees +/- 0.39 degrees. Regarding the precision of the 2 scanners, the intraclass correlation coefficient value of 3dMD was approximately 1.00, and that of Bellus3D was 0.99. The interobserver agreement for each linear and angular measurement was 0.99. Conclusions: The trueness of each scanner was clinically acceptable for diagnosis and treatment planning. The precision of 3D photographs obtained by 3dMD and Bellus3D showed good scanning repeatability. The interobserver agreement between the 3 operators was rated as excellent (0.99).

Consistency of Peer Assessment Rating Index by Computer 3D Digital Measurement and Manual Measurement

Digital measurement method for comparing the absolute marginal discrepancy of three-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses fabricated using conventional and digital technologies

Validity of the American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index and the Peer Assessment Rating Index for Comprehensive Evaluation of Malocclusion Severity

Interpreting Weightings of the Peer Assessment Rating Index and the Discrepancy Index Across Contexts on Chinese Patients.

[Validation of Subjective and Objective Evaluation Methods for Orthodontic Treatment Outcome].

Comparison of the Accuracy (trueness and Precision) of Virtual Dentofacial Patients Digitized by Three Different Methods Based on 3D Facial and Dental Images

Quantitative Evaluation Of Three-Dimensional Facial Scanners Measurement Accuracy For Facial Deformity

Evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of 3D digital dental models with laser scanning

Accuracy of 3-Dimensional Stereophotogrammetry: Comparison of the 3dmd and Bellus3D Facial Scanning Systems with One Another and with Direct Anthropometry.

Comparison of Measurements Between Intraoral Scanned Digital Model and Plaster Model

Accuracy of Intraoral Scanned Digital Model with Metal Brackets

[Application of PAR index and cephalometrics for camouflage therapy and orthodontic-orthognathic surgery in adults with skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion]

Reliability Assessment and Correlation Analysis of Evaluating Orthodontic Treatment Outcome in Chinese Patients

Accuracy of different tooth surfaces on 3D printed dental models: orthodontic perspective

Reliability of Three-Dimensional Reconstruction and Measurement System for Complete Denture Occlusion

Comparison between Clinical and Digital Soft Tissue Measurements

A retrospective study of the accuracy of Invisalign Progress Assessment with clear aligners

The Accuracy of a Novel 3D Digital Evaluation Method of Intraoral Fitness for Removable Partial Dentures.

The accuracy (trueness and precision) of Bellus3DARC-7 and an in-vivo analysis of intra and inter-examiner reliability of digital and manual anthropometry

Comparison of the Dimensional and Morphological Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Digital Dental Casts Digitized Using Different Methods.

Accuracy and reliability of measurements performed using two different software programs on digital models generated using laser and computed tomography plaster model scanners