Abstract:BACKGROUND: The study's objective was to assess the dimensional accuracy and reliability of dental digital models prepared by direct intraoral scanning and indirect scanning of the plaster models compared to the plaster models as the gold standard.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 20 patients. Nine had a class I malocclusion, seven had a class II malocclusion, and four had a class III malocclusion. Intraoral scanning was done for the upper and lower arches of all the patients enrolled in this study using an intraoral scanner (i700; Medit, Seoul, Korea). The next step was preparing the plaster model for the control group. Addition-silicone impressions were taken for each patient's arches. The impressions were poured according to American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) standards. Finally, the digital models of the indirect scanning group were prepared using a 3D desktop scanner (T710; Medit). In total, 26 measurements were made on the plaster and digital models. Paired t-tests were used to test for significant differences between the studied groups. The reliability of the studied techniques was tested using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Because of the multiple comparisons, the ɑ level was adjusted and set at 0.002.RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the intraoral scanning group (20 patients) and the plaster models group (20 patients; P>0.002). The ICCs ranged from 0.814 to 0.993, indicating excellent agreement between the direct digital and traditional plaster models. There were no significant differences between the digital and original plaster models (P>0.002). ICCs ranged from 0.834 to 0.995, indicating excellent agreement between the indirect digital and original plaster models. No significant differences were detected between the direct and indirect digital models (P>0.002). ICCs ranged between 0.813 and 0.999, indicating excellent agreement between direct and indirect digital models.CONCLUSION: Both direct and indirect scanning techniques are accurate and reliable for digital model preparation and can be considered an alternative to traditional plaster models used in clinical orthodontics diagnostic applications. The intraoral scanning technique can be considered a valid alternative for indirect scanning of the plaster models to prepare digital working models during the digital design and fabrication of orthodontic appliances such as clear aligners.

Precision of Three-Dimensional Printed Brackets

Digital measurement method for comparing the absolute marginal discrepancy of three-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses fabricated using conventional and digital technologies

Accuracy of Intraoral Scanned Digital Model with Metal Brackets

Three Dimensional Evaluation of Accuracy of Bracket Positioning

Comparison of the accuracy of two techniques for three-dimensional digital indirect bonding of orthodontic brackets: A randomized controlled trial

Evaluating the accuracy of one-piece and three-piece 3D-printed indirect bonding transfer trays: An in vitro study

3D‐printed zirconia orthodontic brackets: Effect of printing method on dimensional accuracy

Impact of Orthodontic Brackets on the Intraoral Scan Data Accuracy

Accurate Bracket Placement Using a Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing-Guided Bonding Device: an in Vivo Study

Potential for bracket bonding errors based on tray accuracy and fit: Evaluation of 6 photopolymer resins for indirect bonding trays

Accuracy of different tooth surfaces on 3D printed dental models: orthodontic perspective

Accuracy evaluation of 3D-printed dental models used for the fabrication of clear aligners in mild malocclusions

Accuracy (trueness and precision) of 3D printed orthodontic models finalized to clear aligners production, testing crowded and spaced dentition

Optimization of three-dimensional printing parameters for orthodontic applications

Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Digital Models Formulated From Direct Intra-oral Scanning of Dental Arches in Comparison With Extra-oral Scanning of Poured Dental Models in Terms of Dimensional Accuracy and Reliability

Comparison of 1- and 3-piece directly 3-dimensional printed indirect bonding trays: An in vitro study

Three-dimension digitized printing technology of lingual orthodontic brackets

Accuracy of 3D-Printed Dental Models of Different Tooth Surfaces

Effect of printing technology and orientation on the accuracy of three-dimensional printed retainers

Evaluation of current additive manufacturing systems for orthodontic 3-dimensional printing

A Comparison of Accuracy in Bracket Positioning Between Two Techniques--localizing the Centre of the Clinical Crown and Measuring the Distance from the Incisal Edge.