Abstract:(1) Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the full arch scan accuracy (precision and trueness) of nine digital intra-oral scanners and four lab scanners. Previous studies have compared the accuracy of some intra-oral scanners, but as this is a field of quickly developing technologies, a more up-to-date study was needed to assess the capabilities of currently available models. (2) Methods: The present in vitro study compared nine different intra-oral scanners (Omnicam 4.6; Omnicam 5.1; Primescan; CS 3600; Trios 3; Trios 4; Runyes; i500; and DL206) as well as four lab light scanners (Einscan SE; 300e; E2; and Ineos X5) to investigate the accuracy of each scanner by examining the overall trueness and precision. Ten aligned and cut scans from each of the intra-oral and lab scanners in the in vitro study were brought into CloudCompare. A comparison was made with the master STL using the CloudCompare 3D analysis best-fit algorithm. The results were recorded along with individual standard deviation and a colorimetric map of the deviation across the surface of the STL mesh; a comparison was made to the master STL, quantified at specific points. (3) Results: In the present study, the Primescan had the best overall trueness (17.3 ± 4.9), followed by (in order of increasing deviation) the Trios 4 (20.8 ± 6.2), i500 (25.2 ± 7.3), CS3600 (26.9 ± 15.9), Trios 3 (27.7 ± 6.8), Runyes (47.2 ± 5.4), Omnicam 5.1 (55.1 ± 9.5), Omnicam 4.6 (57.5 ± 3.2), and Launca DL206 (58.5 ± 22.0). Regarding the lab light scanners, the Ineos X5 had the best overall trueness with (0.0 ± 1.9), followed by (in order of increasing deviation) the 3Shape E2 (3.6 ± 2.2), Up3D 300E (12.8 ± 2.7), and Einscan SE (14.9 ± 9.5). (4) Conclusions: This study confirms that all current generations of intra-oral digital scanners can capture a reliable, reproducible full arch scan in dentate patients. Out of the intra-oral scanners tested, no scanner produced results significantly similar in trueness to the Ineos X5. However, the Primescan was the only one to be statistically of a similar level of trueness to the 3Shape E2 lab scanner. All scanners in the study had mean trueness of under 60-micron deviation. While this study can compare the scanning accuracy of this sample in a dentate arch, the scanning of a fully edentulous arch is more challenging. The accuracy of these scanners in edentulous cases should be examined in further studies.

Reliability of a 3D Spot Laser Scanner for Orthodontic Applications

Reliability of a 3D spot laser scanner for orthodontic applications

Reliability of a newly designed dental cast laser scanner

The Reliability Study of Three-Dimensional Dental Cast Laser Scanner and Comparison with Manual Measurement

[A Study on the Stability and Reliability of 3D Laser Cranio-Maxillofacial Reconstruction].

Reproducibility of linear measurements performed in dental models from 3D printing

Accuracy evaluation of 3D-printed dental models used for the fabrication of clear aligners in mild malocclusions

Accuracy (trueness and precision) of 3D printed orthodontic models finalized to clear aligners production, testing crowded and spaced dentition

[The Study on Three-Dimensional Laser Scanning of Dental Model and Computer Aided Set-Up].

[Accuracy and reproducibility of intraoral scanning in vivo]

Accuracy of 3D printed scan bodies for dental implants using two additive manufacturing systems: An in vitro study

Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions

A Comparison of Full Arch Trueness and Precision of Nine Intra-Oral Digital Scanners and Four Lab Digital Scanners

Accuracy Evaluation of a New Three-Dimensional Reproduction Method of Edentulous Dental Casts, and Wax Occlusion Rims with Jaw Relation.

Accuracy of different tooth surfaces on 3D printed dental models: orthodontic perspective

[Quantitative Evaluation for the Accuracy of Dental Model Three-Dimensional Scanner].

A Method to Evaluate the Trueness of Reconstructed Dental Models Made with Photo-Curing 3D Printing Technologies

Accuracy and reliability of measurements performed using two different software programs on digital models generated using laser and computed tomography plaster model scanners

Evaluation and comparison of the accuracy of three intraoral scanners for replicating a complete denture

Evaluation of the Quality of Three-Dimensional Data Acquired by Using Two Kinds of Structure Light Intra-Oral Scanner to Scan the Crown Preparation Model

Efficacy of the chair-side-made clear aligners by digital setup and 3D printing in mild relapse cases