Abstract:Statement of problem. The accuracy of digital scanning for complete dental arch and implant-supported complete-arch restorations has been reported. However, research addressing the accuracy of digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation is lacking. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of intraoral scanning, impression scanning, and cast scanning for complete-arch preparation.Material and methods. Maxillary and mandibular jaw typodonts with 28 teeth prepared for complete crowns were used as reference casts and digitized as reference data sets with a desktop scanner. Three digital scanning methods were applied. First, the reference casts were each scanned 10 times with an intraoral scanner to generate the intraoral scanning group data sets. Second, the reference casts were each captured 10 times by using polyvinyl siloxane impression material, and the impressions were scanned with a desktop scanner to generate the impression scanning group data sets. Third, the impressions obtained in the impression scanning group were used to make gypsum casts which were then digitized with a desktop scanner to generate the cast scanning group data sets. Accuracy was determined by trueness and precision. Three-dimensional deviations of the prepared arches and anterior and posterior segments were measured from root mean square values and depicted on color-difference maps. Differences among test groups were analyzed by using a 1-way ANOVA and the post hoc Bonferroni test for normally distributed data or the Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction for non-normally distributed data (a=.05).Results. The trueness of the maxillary arch was significantly higher in the impression scanning group than in the cast scanning and intraoral scanning groups (P<.05), but no significant differences were found among the 3 groups of the mandibular arch (P>.05). The precision of both arches was significantly higher in the impression scanning and intraoral scanning groups than in the cast scanning group (P<.05). Color maps showed horizontal symmetrical displacement in the intraoral scanning group relative to the reference data sets and within-group unilateral distal-end distortion. Irregular arch deformations were noted in the impression scanning group, and buccal and occlusal expansion occurred in the anterior-posterior direction in the cast scanning group. Pooled data for anterior teeth indicated that the trueness was lowest in the intraoral scanning group; however, that for the maxillary anterior teeth did not differ, while that for the mandibular anterior teeth differed significantly among groups (P<.05). For the posterior teeth, deviation was the lowest in the impression scanning group, and significant differences were noted in both arches among the 3 groups (P<.05).Conclusions. Of the methods tested, impression scanning was the most accurate for the creation of a digital cast of a complete prepared arch. (J Prosthet Dent 2022;128:1001-8)

The Reliability Study of Three-Dimensional Dental Cast Laser Scanner and Comparison with Manual Measurement

Reliability of a newly designed dental cast laser scanner

Digital measurement method for comparing the absolute marginal discrepancy of three-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses fabricated using conventional and digital technologies

Calibration for the 3D dental cast scanner system

Dental Cast Scanning System with Special Axes

Comparison of Measurements Between Intraoral Scanned Digital Model and Plaster Model

Accuracy Evaluation of a New Three-Dimensional Reproduction Method of Edentulous Dental Casts, and Wax Occlusion Rims with Jaw Relation.

Comparisons of precision and trueness of digital dental casts produced by desktop scanners and intraoral scanners

[The Study on Three-Dimensional Laser Scanning of Dental Model and Computer Aided Set-Up].

Comparison of the Dimensional and Morphological Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Digital Dental Casts Digitized Using Different Methods.

[A Study on the Stability and Reliability of 3D Laser Cranio-Maxillofacial Reconstruction].

Reliability of a 3D Spot Laser Scanner for Orthodontic Applications

A Computer-Aided Reconstructing And Measuring System Of 3d Dental Cast With Circular Scanning Data

Accuracy and Reproducibility of Virtual Edentulous Casts Created by Laboratory Impression Scan Protocols.

[A Scanning Method for the Dental Casts of Intercuspal Position].

[Quantitative Evaluation for the Accuracy of Dental Model Three-Dimensional Scanner].

Accuracy of intercuspal occlusion in 3D reconstruction of three dental cast scanning systems

Accuracy of Three Digital Scanning Methods for Complete-Arch Tooth Preparation: an in Vitro Comparison

Comparison of the Accuracy (trueness and Precision) of Virtual Dentofacial Patients Digitized by Three Different Methods Based on 3D Facial and Dental Images

Evaluation of the Quality of Three-Dimensional Data Acquired by Using Two Kinds of Structure Light Intra-Oral Scanner to Scan the Crown Preparation Model