Abstract:Objective:To explore the feasibility of using the sigma metrics calculated with the data of internal quality control for the comparison of the analytical performance between different biochemical analyzers.Methods:The internal quality control results of twenty-five biochemical assays in the biochemical analyzers of the department of clinical laboratory in Cancer Hospital from February 1, 2021 to July 31, 2021 were collected. The formula sigma =( TEa- Bias)/ CV was used to calculate the sigma metrics of two different levels of the biochemical assays including albumin, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, calcium, cholesterol, creatine kinase, chlorine, creatinine, γ- glutamyltranspeptidase, blood glucose, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, immunoglobulin A, immunoglobulin G, immunoglobulin M, potassium, lactate dehydrogenase, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, sodium, inorganic phosphorus, total bilirubin, triglyceride, total protein, urea, uric acid. The imprecision was obtained by the coefficient of variation of internal quality control. The bias was calculated by the deviation between the mean of internal quality control of the comparison instrument and the target instrument. The allowable total error ( TEa) was based on People's Republic of China Health Industry Standard (WS/T403-2012) or EQA standard of National Center for Clinical Laboratories (NCCL). Compared the sigma values of the comparison instrument relative to the target instrument with the average percentage bias obtained by the traditional comparison method. Quality goal index was used to analyze the causes of poor performance and judge the results of comparison. Results:Compared with the target instrument Beckman AU5800-3, the comparison instrument Beckman AU5800-1 had 10 assays with σ>6, accounting for 40%, 23 assays with σ>3, accounting for 92%, and only albumin and blood glucose showed σ<3. Through statostical analysis, the comparisons of all assays were passed. The comparison instrument Beckman AU5800-2 had 8 assays with σ>6, accounting for 32%, 20 assays with σ>3, accounting for 80%. Only alkaline phosphatase, calcium, lactate dehydrogenase, total protein and urea showed σ<3. Through statostical analysis, the comparisons of GGT and IgM failed. For the traditional comparison method, the percentage bias between the comparison instruments and the target instrument were all within the range of the evaluation standard. But there was no significant correlation between the σ value and the average bias of the traditional comparison method, and the biases were correlated.Conclusions:Using the sigma metrics calculated with the data of internal quality control for the comparison of different detection systems is a convenient and operable method. It can monitor the comparability between different detection systems in the laboratory at any time and be the supplement of the traditional comparison method.

Analysis of the comparability of the results of 26 serum biochemical indicators in two different biochemical analysis systems

The comparison of the results of 9 routine biochemistry items on 3 different biochemical testing systems

Comparative Study on the Results with Different Biochemical Detecting Systems

The Contrast and Bias Estimation on the Result of Routine Biochemistry Items in Different Biochemical Testing Systems

Comparison analysis and bias evaluation on some determination results between wet type biochemistry and dry type biochemistry analyzers

The Comparative Study on the Results with Different Biochemical Detecting Systems

Ensure the accuracy and consistency of biochemical analyzer test results: Chemometrics for instrument and inter-instrument item comparison in Chinese hospital laboratory

Exploration of the comparison between different biochemical detection systems based on sigma metrics

Quality Assurance of Clinical Biochemistry Testing:A Mualti-Center Study Based Reference Interval for Clinical Chemistry Tests in the Chinese Population

Comparabilily Study on Results of TP and ALB with Different Detecting Systems

Comparison Of Test Results And Performances Of Hitachi 7600 And Beckman Olympus 5800 Automatic Biochemical Analyzers

Study on the Traceability and Comparability of a Self-Developed Biochemical Testing System

Evaluation of Urea Reagent Kits Using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Reference Measurement Procedures

Evaluation the compatibilty and biases of three routine methods to determine serum bilirubin

Analysis and evaluation of test results acquired from three different types of hematology analyzers

Evaluation of the Comparability of Wantai Wan200+ Instrument with Routine Laboratory Assays for 21 Different Analytes

Comparison of Three Routine Methods for the Measurement of Serum Bilirubin in a China Laboratory.

Establishment of Reference Method for Serum Urea Detection and Comparison with Routine Urea Kits

Evaluation of Sysmex Hematology Analyzers with Fresh Blood

Comparison of Analytical Performances of Two Mindray 380 Auto Biochemistry Analyzers

Performance evaluation of some domestically produced biochemical reagents