Investigation of precision and trueness of the glucose results from 15 measure systems in 4 domestic factories

LIU Ou,XU Guo-bin,WANG Lan-zhen,XIA Chang-yu,LI Hai-xia,LIU Yan
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the precision and trueness of the glucose results from the domestic kits on different analyzers. Methods To provide 5 levels serum glucose standard reference materials which the target values are assigned by reference methods for 4 domestic glucose kits factories,factories choose analyzers by themselves, they calibrated with factory calibrator and C2 respectively, then measure the 5 levels serum. Results The results of all 15 measure systems variation by factory calibrator calibrated are higher than the results by C2 calibrated; when calibrated by factory calibrator, the variation of 8 measure systems adopt GOD method are higher than the variation of 7 measure systems adopt HK method, there are no difference between the two methods measure systems when calibrated by C2. When calibrated by factory calibrator, Bias of C1 ~ C5 include 15 measure systems are respectively:-2.92% ~ 11.68%、-3.37% ~ 9.79%、-3.75% ~ 8.75%、-3.11% ~ 9.55%、-4.38% ~ 8.28%, there are 3 measure systems bias are beyond the limit of the Europe biological variation total error(5.5%), there are 2measure systems bias are beyond the limit of the U.S.A. criterion analyze total error(6%), there is 1measure system bias is beyond the limit of the CLIA′88 defined acceptable error(10%);When calibrated by C2,Bias of C1 ~ C5 include 15 measure systems are respectively:-1.95% ~ 3.57%、-1.52% ~ 1.85%、-2.72% ~ 2.27%、-1.82% ~ 2.9%、-2.83% ~ 2.19%, 15 measure systems bias are within the limit of the Europe biological variation total error(5.5%) and the half limit of CLIA′88 defined acceptable error(10%). Conclusions The bias of some routine measure systems are larger. Precision and trueness of routine measure systems can be improved by calibrated with serum standard reference materials.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?