The comparison of the results of 9 routine biochemistry items on 3 different biochemical testing systems

贾珂珂,杨硕,王洪亚,张捷
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-4287.2013.06.033
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study the comparability of 3 different biochemical testing systems by comparing the results of 9 routine items on these 3 systems.Methods According to National Committee for Clinical laboratory Standards(NCCLS) document EP9-A2,9 biochemistry items were analyzed respectively on Modular P-800,Olympus AU5400 and Johnson&Johnson 950 Automatic biochemical analyzers.Using Modular P-800 as the comparative system,to evalate the other two systems.Calculate the relative bias and the linear equtions.The comparability between different systems was judged by comparing the predicted biases on the medical decision levels with the half of clinical laboratory improvement amendment 88(CLIA'88) allowed total error.Results Compared to the comparative system,there was a positve bias of low level Albumin(ALB)(9.50%) and obvious positive bias of Creatine(Cre)(3.52%~32.46%)for evalated system 1,and there was obvious negative bias of Albumin(ALB)(-12.56%~-39.75%)for the evaluated sytem 2.The predicted biases of other items of medical dicision levels were under the acceptable biases.Conclusion There were still biases among the results of some routine items detected on different systems;and it is necessary to compare the different methods,to evaluate the clinical acceptability as to insure the comparability.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?