Comparison of the results' consistency of 3 automated coagulation analyzers for coagulation items

Yue WANG,Chenxue QU,Yan GONG,Xueshuo GAO,Guohong WANG,Guobin XU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2019.03.015

IF: 1.865

2019-01-01

Laboratory Medicine

Abstract:Objective To investigate the consistency of 3 automated coagulation analyzers for coagulation items [prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), ?brinogen (Fib), thrombin time (TT), D-dimer (DD) and ?brin/?brinogen degradation product (FDP) ] and the matrix effects of quality control materials. Methods A total of 100 samples were collected.Totally, PT, PT-INR, APTT, Fib, TT, DD and FDP were determined by 3 automated coagulation analyzers, including CA7000, Top700 and CP2000. Linear regression analysis was used to analyze the correlation of results. The relative deviation between any 2 analyzers was calculated. The matrix effect of 18 quality control materials for PT, Fib and DD was assessed with regression. Results There were good correlations among the 3 automated coagulation analyzers for PT, PT-INR and Fib (r2=0.91-0.99). The deviations between any 2 analyzers were ＜15％, 15％ and20％. The results of DD among the 3 automated coagulation analyzers had correlations (r2≥0.90), CA7000 and CP2000 had good consistency, but the results of Top700 were lower than those of CA7000 and CP2000. Moderate correlations were observed for APTT and TT (r2=0.56-0.76). Medical kits for FDP and matched calibrators were adopted to the 3 analyzers. There was a high correlation for FDP and DD (r2＞0.99, r2=0.92-0.99), and there was difference between any 2 analyzers. There was no compatibility for PT, Fib and DD on the 3 analyzers in 18 quality control materials. Conclusions The consistency of the results of the 3 automated coagulation analyzers is diverse.The matrix effects should be considered, which makes the deviation of quality control materials greater than that of patient.