Abstract:This article conducts a close examination of China’s exclusionary rules, and presents a detailed discussion of its possible meanings as well as its advantages and shortcomings in the context of comparative law. Part I presents a general survey of China’s exclusionary rules, including the history of the relevant legislation, and ideas that furthered the legislation. Part II explores the relationship between the two provisions concerning excluding illegally obtained evidence and evaluating and examining evidence promulgated in 2010. Part III gives a detailed survey of the scope of China’s exclusionary rules, and introduces different interpretations of China’s criminal procedure rules. Part IV introduces rules concerning procedural issues of the exclusionary rules, and the burden of proof in relation to the legality of the obtainment of evidence. Part V summarizes the characteristics of China’s exclusionary rules in the context of a comparative analysis. The article argues that China’s exclusionary rules are mainly based on the concern of convicting innocent people, and this innocent people protection impetus makes the rules naturally weak in protecting all citizens in criminal procedure. Secondly, China’s exclusionary rules are based on the classification of evidence, and this classification results in many inconveniences, particularly when contrasted to the American rule that is based on the classification of rights. Thirdly, a discretionary exclusionary rule for physical and documentary evidence is not suitable for China. Fourthly, the absence of a poisonous tree doctrine may undermine China’s exclusionary rules in practice. Last but not least, China’s exclusionary rules may be classified as “judge-shared” exclusionary rules, contrasted to the American model of “judge-controlled” exclusionary rules.

A New Discussion of Bribery after Comparative Analysis

On the Independence of Commercial Bribery Crime

On Application Scope of Judicial Interpretation over New Forms of Bribery

On China's Criminal Law Against Commercial Bribery Regulation——Perspective to "united Nations Convention Against Corruption"

Is Individual Bribery or Organizational Bribery More Intolerable in China (versus in the United States)? Advancing Theory on the Perception of Corrupt Acts

On the Range Expansion of the Main Bodies of Commercial Bribery Crime in Legislation

What is wrong with bribery? A comparative analysis of United Kingdom and Nigerian anti-bribery statutes

Reconsideration and Reconstruction of the Mechanism of Controlling Commercial Bribery Crime

Cultural Difference in Perception of Individual versus Organizational Bribery

On “Taking advantage of the Convenience of Position”of the Crime of Bribery

The Decoding about Some Problems on Bribery Crime of Influence

An Analysis of Collective Corruption: A Perspective of Human Relations

On the Persistent Effect Mechanism of Commercial Bribery Crime Controlling

Exclusionary Rules in China

Bribery in Family Firm: an Ability-Willingness Paradox

Judicial Determination of a New Type of Bribery:In the Light of Designating “People v.Pan Yumei and Chen Ning”as a Guiding Case

Establishing and Improving Criminal Legislation on Embezzlement and Accepting Bribes

Analysis of the Criminal Liability of the Payoff Journalism

The Application of Objective Imputation Theory in Property Crime Cases

Analysis of Objective Problems in the Elements of the Crime of Fraud on Commercial Instruments

The Development of the New Conduct without Value Theory in China