What is wrong with bribery? A comparative analysis of United Kingdom and Nigerian anti-bribery statutes

Akeem Olajide Bello
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03050718.2012.744439
2013-03-01
Commonwealth Law Bulletin
Abstract:The article asks the question: what is wrong with bribery? Pre-2010 UK and extant Nigerian anti-bribery statutes fail to clearly express the problem with bribery. The author appraises the various approaches to conceptualising the wrong in bribery. A comparative analysis of the UK Bribery Act 2010 (UK Act) and Nigerian anti-bribery statutes is undertaken with a view to exploring whether useful insights can be gained as a model to reform the law on bribery in Nigeria. The paper argues that a clear articulation of what is wrong with bribery is essential to strengthen anti-bribery statutes in Nigeria. The paper argues further that the articulation of what is wrong with bribery also provides a tool to understand what is wrong with other manifestations of corruption generally, and to strengthen their criminalisation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?