Study on Jurisdictional Disputes and Coordination Mechanisms in Foreign Criminal Cases: Taking Commercial Bribery as an Example
Ziming Ren
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62051/zq7xa216
2024-08-29
Abstract:China has achieved fruitful results in anti-corruption efforts domestically, but it is also important to note that the issue of corruption and bribery related to foreign affairs is gradually emerging. With the increasing degree of opening up to the outside world, many enterprises are going abroad, and many overseas enterprises are also seeking development domestically, resulting in an increase in criminal acts of corruption and bribery. When enforcing the law on foreign-related corruption issues, conflicts of criminal jurisdiction over foreign-related crimes are an unavoidable issue. Currently, China has many shortcomings in governing foreign-related corruption cases, such as incomplete criminal legislation, insufficient law enforcement capabilities, and insufficient international cooperation. At the same time, the United States has gradually begun to use the FCPA to exercise long-term jurisdiction over Chinese overseas enterprises, which has to be taken seriously. In response to this situation, it is necessary to improve China's foreign-related criminal jurisdiction in areas such as legislation, law enforcement, and cooperation, strengthen international and regional cooperation, and write a new chapter in the history of human anti-corruption struggle.
Law