Reconsideration of Distribution of Liabilities of Crime Committed by an Entity

YE Liang-fang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-2397.2008.01.012
2008-01-01
Abstract:The legislation providing that an entity may commit a crime and should be subject punishment bears a tinge of "rigidness but not severity." However,for a long time,while misunderstanding the structure of "entity crime," people have been seeking to determine liabilities born by the entity or the representatives thereof within the framework of one criminal act.Consequently,there appear many contradictions and conflicts both in legislative theories and judicial practice.Thus,it is urgent to reconsider the structure pattern of the crime committed by an entity.In deed,it contains two crimes:one perpetrated by the representatives of an entity which is physical while the other committed by the entity which is fictitious.The two crimes are closely linked but they are two criminal acts separate from each other and cannot be held an accomplice.As such,the entity and the representatives thereof are parallel and independent subjects of crime whose liabilities should be attributed to their respective acts.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?