Abstract:The passive Responsibilism,"nulla poena sine culpa",is a commonly agreed criminal principle and the basic requirement of human rights.Penalty measurement concerns the protection of the human rights of defendants and even the general human rights condition in a country,thus the Point theory of penalty measurement,which is the inevitable conclusion of the passive Responsibilism,should be adopted.According to the Point theory,criminal responsibility determines the toplimit of a punishment.Only under this point can judges consider the necessity of crime prevention.The opinion and its practice of measuring penalty beyond the toplimit decided by responsibility for the necessity of crime prevention or sentencing a heavier punishment under the responsibility—decided penalty (point) for the needs of general prevention not only go against Responsibilism,but also violate defendants' dignity. In fact,synthesis idealism calls for a balance between responsibility—related and prevention —related punishment and judges need to tell which one is influenced by a special plot,because prevention—related plots can be only considered under responsibility—decided penalty (point). The principle of suiting punishment to crime,which is interpreted as heavy punishment fits heavy offense and light punishment fits minor offense,is just for responsibility—decided penalty,not for declaratory penalty.As to declaratory punishment,such principle should be applied asymmetrically. Namely,in accordance with the Point theory,this principle means only that a punishment can not exceed the responsibility—decided toplimit.In this way,although this principle can be interpreted as light punishment fits minor offense,a heavy penalty does not always follow a heavy crime.On the contrary,a light punishment may be sentenced considering minor needs of prevention, even if a heavy crime is accused.To put it bluntly,the principle of suiting punishment to crime permits a sentence under responsibility—decided penalty (point). Neither Current criminal theories guiding discussion on the criterion and method of penalty measurement nor the judicial practice insisting on the normalization of penalty measurement fully consist with Responsibilism.For criminal theory and practice,the highest priority is to carry out Responsibilism in the theory and practice of penalty measurement.

Criminal Compromise:A New Penalty Reform Notion

Jurisprudential Reflections on Community Correction

On the Basic Philosophy of Criminal Reconciliation——Comparative Study between Zhejiang "Fengqiao Experience" and U.S. VOR Model

Reconsideration of Distribution of Liabilities of Crime Committed by an Entity

The Pretrial Agreement System of American Corporate Crime in the Perspective of Constitutionalism:Reviewing the Stein Case

The Change of Criminal Policies and the Penalty Categories Reform

The Predicament of Criminal Reconciliation System and Possible Solutions

On the Private Cooperation Model in Criminal Proceedings

The Abolishment of Imprisonment Penalty

Community Correction and the Modification of the Criminal Law

Community Correction,its Current Situation,and How to Approach It in China

On Discretionary Mechanism of Penalty for Minor Offenders

Criminal Mediation and Traditional Theory of Criminal Responsibility

The Perfection of Non-penalty Rectification System about Minor Crime in our Country

The System of Eliminating the Juveniles' Criminal Records under the Visual Field of Comparative Law——Based on the Criminal Policy of Combining Punishment with Leniency

Current System of Constitution of Crime Does Not Have to Be Restructured

Responsibilism and the Doctrine of Penalty Measurement

On Criminal Penalty Restriction in Internet Public Opinion Supervising

Retrospection and Reflection on the Criminal Judicial Reform in Recent Years

The Dilemma and Breakthrough of General Principle of Punishing Preparatory Crime

Response on Principles of the Constitutional Human Rights about Penalty Structure Adjustment