Abstract:The position of objective imputation is concerned with the nature of constitutive requirements. This article discusses this problem in the context of the substantialization of constitutive requirements. Objective imputation and causation are two totally different concepts. Causation is committed to the issue of attribution, while objective imputation is concerned with blamefulness. Thus objective imputation is parallel to causation and should be coped with by substantially examining the constitutive requirements after solving the issue of causation. Moreover, the thinking methods of causation and objective imputation are different. The issue of causation only focuses on the relationship between act and consequence, so before determining whether causation exists or not, we should first examine whether the act and the consequence exist or not. This kind of sepration can not examine the constitutive requirements substantially in some instances. In this aspect, objective imputation carries out a substantializing exanimation of act and consequence, thus goes beyond the bounds of causation and comes into the scope of blamefulness. There is no hierarchy in the "Four Elements" theory in Chinese criminal law. Although the "Four Elements" theory contains a substantial examination criterion, i. e., the theory of harmfulness to society, this criterion has not been included into the analytic scheme of crime as a constitutive element, and is kept away from even overtops the analytic scheme of crime. There exist three theoretical obstacles to introduce objective imputation into Chinese criminal law under contemporary circumstances, that is, the insurmountable contradiction between objective imputation and harmfulness to society, the insuperable conflict between objective imputation and causation, and the unavoidable inconsistency between objective imputation and the "Four Elements" theory. Only by abandoning the "Four Elements" theory and introducing the "Tripartite Scheme" theory as the analytic scheme of crime can objective imputation theory survive in Chinese criminal law.

Culpability in Criminal Law: A Study on the Blameworthiness

Reconsideration of Distribution of Liabilities of Crime Committed by an Entity

On the Formal Structure of Unit Crime

The Principle of Culpability and Foreseeablity in Negligent Crime

On the Systematic Status of Guiltless Event

Responsibilitism and Knowledge of Illegality

Objective Culpability and the Fate of Reasonable Expectation

A Study on the Knowledge of Illegality

Value Judgment and the Knowledge Transformation of Chinese Criminal Jurisprudence

A Positive Analysis of the Criterion of State Compensatory Liability

Research on the Mechanism of Unreasonable Objective Attribution

Systematic Position of Objective Imputation

Fundamental Questions about Responsibility

Criminal Blame, Exclusion and Moral Dialogue

On Primary Guilty Mind

The Substantialiazation of Explanation of Criminal Law─The base Line of Legality is the Balance of Crime and Punishment

The Framework of Doctrines of Criminalization Based on Violation and Culpability

Self-Blame and Moral Responsibility

Personal and Collective Culpability Judgment

From Attribution to Zurechnung:The Study of the Theory of Objektive Zurechnung

Culpable Control and Counterfactual Reasoning in the Psychology of Blame