Abstract:The position of objective imputation is concerned with the nature of constitutive requirements. This article discusses this problem in the context of the substantialization of constitutive requirements. Objective imputation and causation are two totally different concepts. Causation is committed to the issue of attribution, while objective imputation is concerned with blamefulness. Thus objective imputation is parallel to causation and should be coped with by substantially examining the constitutive requirements after solving the issue of causation. Moreover, the thinking methods of causation and objective imputation are different. The issue of causation only focuses on the relationship between act and consequence, so before determining whether causation exists or not, we should first examine whether the act and the consequence exist or not. This kind of sepration can not examine the constitutive requirements substantially in some instances. In this aspect, objective imputation carries out a substantializing exanimation of act and consequence, thus goes beyond the bounds of causation and comes into the scope of blamefulness. There is no hierarchy in the "Four Elements" theory in Chinese criminal law. Although the "Four Elements" theory contains a substantial examination criterion, i. e., the theory of harmfulness to society, this criterion has not been included into the analytic scheme of crime as a constitutive element, and is kept away from even overtops the analytic scheme of crime. There exist three theoretical obstacles to introduce objective imputation into Chinese criminal law under contemporary circumstances, that is, the insurmountable contradiction between objective imputation and harmfulness to society, the insuperable conflict between objective imputation and causation, and the unavoidable inconsistency between objective imputation and the "Four Elements" theory. Only by abandoning the "Four Elements" theory and introducing the "Tripartite Scheme" theory as the analytic scheme of crime can objective imputation theory survive in Chinese criminal law.

On the Systematic Status of Guiltless Event

Continuation of Systemic Failures: from Cui Ning to Contemporary Wrongful Conviction Cases in China

Culpability in Criminal Law: A Study on the Blameworthiness

The Principle of Culpability and Foreseeablity in Negligent Crime

On the negligence of unit crime

Knowledge of Illegality Is not a Element of Intent

A Positive Analysis of the Criterion of State Compensatory Liability

On the Theory of Objective Imputation and the Judicial Practice in China

On Primary Guilty Mind

Systematic Position of Objective Imputation

Responsibilitism and Knowledge of Illegality

A Study on the Knowledge of Illegality

Theory of Criminal Constitutive Elements:Relationship Confusion and Conquer

The Development of the New Conduct without Value Theory in China

The Notion of the Criminal Law in Contemporary China

On the Mechanism of Disposing the Case Where the Defendant Pleads Guilty

Study on Offence Form of Negligently Causing Serious Accident Crime

Value Judgment and the Knowledge Transformation of Chinese Criminal Jurisprudence

The New Thinking on the Necessity of Negligence

The Studies of Negligent Crime

Theory of Legal Interest Violation and the Determination of Crimes