Study on Jurisdictional Disputes and Coordination Mechanisms in Foreign Criminal Cases: Taking Commercial Bribery as an Example

Ziming Ren
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62051/zq7xa216
2024-08-29
Abstract:China has achieved fruitful results in anti-corruption efforts domestically, but it is also important to note that the issue of corruption and bribery related to foreign affairs is gradually emerging. With the increasing degree of opening up to the outside world, many enterprises are going abroad, and many overseas enterprises are also seeking development domestically, resulting in an increase in criminal acts of corruption and bribery. When enforcing the law on foreign-related corruption issues, conflicts of criminal jurisdiction over foreign-related crimes are an unavoidable issue. Currently, China has many shortcomings in governing foreign-related corruption cases, such as incomplete criminal legislation, insufficient law enforcement capabilities, and insufficient international cooperation. At the same time, the United States has gradually begun to use the FCPA to exercise long-term jurisdiction over Chinese overseas enterprises, which has to be taken seriously. In response to this situation, it is necessary to improve China's foreign-related criminal jurisdiction in areas such as legislation, law enforcement, and cooperation, strengthen international and regional cooperation, and write a new chapter in the history of human anti-corruption struggle.
Law
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issues of jurisdictional conflicts and lack of coordination mechanisms that China faces in handling foreign-related criminal cases, particularly transnational commercial bribery crimes. With the deepening of China's opening-up, more and more enterprises are going abroad, while also attracting many overseas enterprises seeking development in China, leading to an increase in transnational corruption and bribery activities. However, in the process of law enforcement, China faces deficiencies in foreign-related criminal jurisdiction, such as imperfect legislation, insufficient enforcement capabilities, and inadequate international cooperation. Additionally, the long-term jurisdiction exercised by the United States over Chinese overseas enterprises through the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) has also drawn China's attention. To address these issues, the paper proposes the need to improve China's foreign-related criminal jurisdiction system from aspects of legislation, enforcement, and cooperation, and to strengthen international and regional cooperation to adapt to the new situation of transnational commercial corruption governance in the context of globalization. Specifically, the paper explores the theoretical framework and legal basis, the current status of China's jurisdiction over foreign-related criminal cases and the regulation of transnational commercial bribery crimes, analyzes typical cases and their existing problems, and puts forward improvement suggestions and optimization paths, including how to deal with overseas "long-arm jurisdiction," drawing on the experience of the US FCPA, and strengthening the role of multilateral mechanisms and international organizations.