Abstract:Purpose The issue of concurrent jurisdiction over cross-border crimes has become common in a globalizing world, while the rigid compliance with territoriality and active personality jurisdiction has created a legal vacuum for cross-border crimes in many situations. The jurisdiction dispute between mainland China and Taiwan over cross-border telecom fraud crimes is a good example. In recent years, the Ministry of Public Security of the People’s Republic of China cracked down a series of cross-border telecom fraud crimes against mainland residents and extradited suspects to mainland China. Given a certain proportion of Taiwan residents in criminal gangs, the Taiwan side raised jurisdiction objections, arguing that mainland China had no right to exercise jurisdiction over Taiwanese criminals. The essence of the jurisdiction dispute between two sides is the concurrence of Taiwan’s right to exercise active personality jurisdiction and the mainland’s right to exercise passive personality jurisdiction. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the connotation of different jurisdiction principles (namely, territorial, active personality, protective and passive personality jurisdiction) and reinterpret their prioritization of applicability from a jurisprudential perspective, and thus, enhance the theoretical basis for resolving the issue of concurrent jurisdiction over cross-border crimes. Design/methodology/approach By reviewing the historical trajectory of major jurisdiction principles since the 1920s, and studying the specificities of the case in this context, this paper argues that territorial jurisdiction and active personality jurisdiction have presumed priority but not an absolute priority for resolving the issue of concurrent jurisdiction. The applicability of protective and passive personality jurisdiction could precede the former provided the jurisdictions of territoriality or active personality are inadequate, incompetent or lack of motivation to combat crimes, which harm other jurisdictions. Findings The developmental trajectory and contemporary connotation of major jurisdiction principles suggests that the legitimacy of the mainland’s exercise of passive personality jurisdiction over Taiwan criminal suspects lies in the urgent need to recover mainland victims’ significant property loss, the incompetence of Taiwan in detecting and prosecuting telecom fraud crimes committed by Taiwanese residents and targeting mainland victims and that the mainland has guaranteed the Taiwan side’s right to be timely informed and fully participate in its exercise of criminal jurisdiction over crimes involving Taiwan suspects. Originality/value Current literature on jurisdiction doctrines mainly uses a historical or descriptive approach to reveal the attitudes of different countries toward jurisdiction principles, which helps little in resolving the issue of concurrent jurisdiction over cross-border crimes in an era of globalization. This paper uses an interpretative approach, reinterprets the contemporary connotation of different jurisdiction principles and redefines the criteria for determining their prioritization in the context of the specificities of a case. It is expected to update the academic literature for resolving concurrent jurisdiction, fill the legal vacuum for combating cross-border crimes created by rigid compliance with territorial jurisdiction, and meanwhile relieve concerns about abuse of extraterritorial jurisdiction as it provides concrete standards for weighting the applicability of jurisdiction principles.

Analysis On the Criminal Jurisdiction Path of Foreign-Related Cybercrime from The Perspective of Transnational Telecom Fraud

A jurisprudential analysis of the concurrent criminal jurisdiction over cross-border telecom fraud crime

Research on How to Deal with the Dilemma of Global Cooperative Governance of Cross-Border Telecom Network Fraud in China

The Dilemma of Telecommunication Fraud Crime——An Analysis of China’s Governance Model as a Sample

On the Trend of Telecom Fraud Crimes Characteristics,the Difficulties of Cracking Them Down and Prevention and Control Strategies

A Bibliometric Study of Research Trends in Cross-Border Cybercrime

Governance framework for voice spam detection and interception of telecom network

Characteristics of Cybercrimes: Evidence from Chinese Judgment Documents

Reflection on Prevention and Control of Telecommunication Network Fraud in Big Data Era

Criminal law regulation of cyber fraud crimes-from the perspective of citizens' personal information protection in the era of edge computing

Discovering group-based transnational cyber fraud actives: A polymethodological view

Determining the Disengagement of Accomplices in Telecom Network Fraud Crimes

Research on Data Analysis and Electronic Forensics Algorithm of Telecom Fraud Activity

Research on China-Laos Cooperation to Combating Cross-Border Telecom Network Fraud

The research on an electronic evidence forensic system for cross-border cybercrime

The Spatiotemporal Pattern and Driving Factors of Cyber Fraud Crime in China

Study on Jurisdictional Disputes and Coordination Mechanisms in Foreign Criminal Cases: Taking Commercial Bribery as an Example

Research on the use of communication big data and AI artificial intelligence technology to construct telecom fraud prevention behavior portrait

Countermeasure of Telecom Network Fraud Investigation Based on Big Data

Telecommunication and cyber fraud victimization among Chinese college students: An application of routine activity theory