Abstract:Purpose The issue of concurrent jurisdiction over cross-border crimes has become common in a globalizing world, while the rigid compliance with territoriality and active personality jurisdiction has created a legal vacuum for cross-border crimes in many situations. The jurisdiction dispute between mainland China and Taiwan over cross-border telecom fraud crimes is a good example. In recent years, the Ministry of Public Security of the People’s Republic of China cracked down a series of cross-border telecom fraud crimes against mainland residents and extradited suspects to mainland China. Given a certain proportion of Taiwan residents in criminal gangs, the Taiwan side raised jurisdiction objections, arguing that mainland China had no right to exercise jurisdiction over Taiwanese criminals. The essence of the jurisdiction dispute between two sides is the concurrence of Taiwan’s right to exercise active personality jurisdiction and the mainland’s right to exercise passive personality jurisdiction. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the connotation of different jurisdiction principles (namely, territorial, active personality, protective and passive personality jurisdiction) and reinterpret their prioritization of applicability from a jurisprudential perspective, and thus, enhance the theoretical basis for resolving the issue of concurrent jurisdiction over cross-border crimes. Design/methodology/approach By reviewing the historical trajectory of major jurisdiction principles since the 1920s, and studying the specificities of the case in this context, this paper argues that territorial jurisdiction and active personality jurisdiction have presumed priority but not an absolute priority for resolving the issue of concurrent jurisdiction. The applicability of protective and passive personality jurisdiction could precede the former provided the jurisdictions of territoriality or active personality are inadequate, incompetent or lack of motivation to combat crimes, which harm other jurisdictions. Findings The developmental trajectory and contemporary connotation of major jurisdiction principles suggests that the legitimacy of the mainland’s exercise of passive personality jurisdiction over Taiwan criminal suspects lies in the urgent need to recover mainland victims’ significant property loss, the incompetence of Taiwan in detecting and prosecuting telecom fraud crimes committed by Taiwanese residents and targeting mainland victims and that the mainland has guaranteed the Taiwan side’s right to be timely informed and fully participate in its exercise of criminal jurisdiction over crimes involving Taiwan suspects. Originality/value Current literature on jurisdiction doctrines mainly uses a historical or descriptive approach to reveal the attitudes of different countries toward jurisdiction principles, which helps little in resolving the issue of concurrent jurisdiction over cross-border crimes in an era of globalization. This paper uses an interpretative approach, reinterprets the contemporary connotation of different jurisdiction principles and redefines the criteria for determining their prioritization in the context of the specificities of a case. It is expected to update the academic literature for resolving concurrent jurisdiction, fill the legal vacuum for combating cross-border crimes created by rigid compliance with territorial jurisdiction, and meanwhile relieve concerns about abuse of extraterritorial jurisdiction as it provides concrete standards for weighting the applicability of jurisdiction principles.

The Dilemma of Telecommunication Fraud Crime——An Analysis of China’s Governance Model as a Sample

Research on How to Deal with the Dilemma of Global Cooperative Governance of Cross-Border Telecom Network Fraud in China

Research on the Online Live Broadcasts of Criminal Trial: An Empirical Analysis Based on Questionnaire Survey

Analysis On the Criminal Jurisdiction Path of Foreign-Related Cybercrime from The Perspective of Transnational Telecom Fraud

Governance framework for voice spam detection and interception of telecom network

Determining the Disengagement of Accomplices in Telecom Network Fraud Crimes

Reflection on Prevention and Control of Telecommunication Network Fraud in Big Data Era

Measuring Public-Involving Economic Crime: A Case Study in Beijing, China

On the Trend of Telecom Fraud Crimes Characteristics,the Difficulties of Cracking Them Down and Prevention and Control Strategies

Communication, Culture, and Governance in Asia | Toward Fragmented Platform Governance in China: Through the Lens of Alibaba and the Legal-Judicial System

Exploring the Cyber Governance Discourse: A Perspective from China

Research on China-Laos Cooperation to Combating Cross-Border Telecom Network Fraud

Study on Jurisdictional Disputes and Coordination Mechanisms in Foreign Criminal Cases: Taking Commercial Bribery as an Example

Alternative Governance and Corporate Financial Fraud in Transition Economies: Evidence From China

Criminal law regulation of cyber fraud crimes-from the perspective of citizens' personal information protection in the era of edge computing

An Analysis of Communications Regulation in Contemporary China

Logic in the Evolution of China Telecom Industry:a Framework of Analysis

A jurisprudential analysis of the concurrent criminal jurisdiction over cross-border telecom fraud crime

Varieties of public–private co-governance on cybersecurity within the digital trade: implications from Huawei’s 5G

Can digital transformation alleviate corporate fraud? Evidence from China