Reform Direction and Development Prospects of Cross-Border Civil and Commercial Litigation in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: Under the Belt and Road Initiative
Dongchen Hou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/28/20231241
2023-12-07
Abstract:Since the inception of the Belt and Road Initiative in 2013, Chinas foreign economic and trade engagements have experienced ongoing growth and expansion. In response to the broader cross-border market, the establishment of a multifaceted dispute resolution framework encompassing litigation, mediation, and arbitration has emerged as a crucial undertaking. This framework is designed to address the growing complexity of international cooperation disputes. Among them, litigation is the most credible and the last guarantee of fairness and justice. Chinas cross-border civil and commercial litigation (Hereinafter referred to as the CBCC litigation) has developed rapidly under the Belt and Road Initiative. However, there are still a series of problems in case filing, service, application of law, proof of foreign laws, and execution of overseas judgments. Due to the national policy of one country, two systems, the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (Hereinafter referred to as the Greater Bay Area) has gained unique regional advantages and strategic value in the CBCC litigation reform and practice. This research summarises the development status of the Greater Bay Area since the Belt and Road Initiative. It identifies three development directions for the modernisation reform of the litigation in the region: high efficiency, legalisation, and internationalisation. In these three directions, the Greater Bay Area has made certain achievements. These achievements prove that Chinas CBCC litigation is actively entering the international track, deepening the determination of international cooperation and exposing the shortcomings of the current cross-border judicial practice. China still has considerable space to progress ahead in enhancing the effectiveness of cross-border dispute resolution, integrating reform initiatives into legal statutes, and advancing international judicial collaboration.