Abstract:Using 29 recent high level anti-corruption cases in China as a natural experiment, we examine the patterns in merger and acquisition (M&A) decisions and performance in Chinese non-state owned enterprises (non-SOEs) before and after the exogenous severing of political connections. We identify a set of listed related non-SOEs whose managers bribed or had connections, through past working and educational experience, with corrupt bureaucrats from 2005 to 2011. We document that, after the arrest of corrupt bureaucrats, corruption related non-SOEs lose their competitive advantages in the M&A market. We observe a significant reduction in the likelihood of conducting M&As and the ability to access local and state-owned targets for these firms. They pay a higher takeover premium and consequently have worse post-M&A performance. Our results are robust when we exclude bribing firms, and firms whose related corrupt bureaucrats are arrested within a year before the announcement of the M&A. Furthermore, the influence of anti-corruption events varies across regions that have different levels of corruption index and industries with different levels of government support and competition. Overall, our study provides direct evidence to the question of why firms seek to establish connections with government officials through bribery or personal connections, and we reveal the benefits and costs of such connections.

Bribery in Family Firm: an Ability-Willingness Paradox

The Ability and Willingness of Family Firms to Bribe: A Socioemotional Wealth Perspective

Political Connections with Corrupt Government Bureaucrats and Corporate M&A Decisions: A Natural Experiment from the Anti-Corruption Cases in China

Corporate Philanthropy and Corporate Misconduct: Evidence from China

Does Family Involvement Make Firms Donate More? Empirical Evidence from Chinese Private Firms

An Empirical Investigation on Firms’ Proactive and Passive Motivation for Bribery in China

Family Management and Corporate Charitable Donations in Chinese Family Firms: an Inverted U‐shaped Relationship

Does familial decision control affect the entrepreneurial orientation of family firms? The moderating role of family relationships

Cognitive Antecedents of Family Business Bias in Investment Decisions: A Commentary on “risky Decisions and the Family Firm Bias: an Experimental Study Based on Prospect Theory”

Do Good Firms Necessarily Do Bad Things? Performance Aspiration, Ownership and Financial Fraud

Kinship - Oriented or Ability - Oriented——an Empirical Study on the Power Allocation Mechanism of the Family - Controlled Public Firms

Family Firms, Corporate Governance and Performance: Evidence from Zhejiang

Cultural Difference in Perception of Individual versus Organizational Bribery

Anti-corruption, Political Connections and Corporate Responses: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Encouraging Non-Family Employee Voice in Family Firm: the Role Model Effect of Owning Family

Is Individual Bribery or Organizational Bribery More Intolerable in China (versus in the United States)? Advancing Theory on the Perception of Corrupt Acts

Grease Or Sand The Wheels? A Integrated Perspective On Bribery-Firm Value Relationship

Does It Pay to Bribe? the Influence of Firm Bribery Activity on Venture Disbanding

Bribery in Emerging Economies: an Integration of Institutional and Non-Market Position Perspective

Between Legitimacy and Socioemotional Wealth: Family Ownership and the Party Branches Building of Chinese Private Enterprises

Bribe Payments under Regulatory Decentralization: Evidence from Rights Offering Regulations in China