Abstract:The importance of corporate governance and external audits has been repeatedly emphasized worldwide since the exposure of the Enron scandal in 2002.With reference particularly to research published by Pae and Yoo in 2001,this paper constructs a game theoretical model primarily featuring a firm's owner(who intends to sell a solely held firm) and an external auditor(who is hired by the owner to issue an audit report).We further introduce into the model cost functions for corporate governance strength and audit effort, and the legal liabilities of the owner and auditor.In our model,the relationship between corporate governance strength,audit effort and audit quality are analyzed systematically.Furthermore,we also analyze the potential effects of the legal liabilities of the owner and auditor on equilibrium corporate governance strength,audit effort and audit quality.The owner's decision on corporate governance strength and the auditor's decision on audit effort in our model will jointly influence the informativeness and quality of the auditor's report to external investors,and ultimately influence the market value of the firm.Our main results include:(1) in equilibrium,an increase in corporate governance strength may encourage the auditor to enhance audit effort and consequently result in a higher level of audit quality;(2) an increase in the owner's legal liability has no effect on the game equilibrium and audit quality even though it may increase the market value of the firm;(3) an increase in the auditor's legal liability may not necessarily decrease corporate governance strength, and can enhance the audit effort and audit quality only when some particular restrictions have been imposed on it.Additionally,the robustness of the results under different situations is discussed in relation to non-audit fees,auditor independence,and other alternative assumptions.Finally,conclusions and potential policy implications are provided.

Grease Or Sand The Wheels? A Integrated Perspective On Bribery-Firm Value Relationship

Corporate Governance,Enforcement of Accounting Standards and Value-Relevance of Earnings

Political Connections with Corrupt Government Bureaucrats and Corporate M&A Decisions: A Natural Experiment from the Anti-Corruption Cases in China

Do Good Firms Necessarily Do Bad Things? Performance Aspiration, Ownership and Financial Fraud

An Empirical Investigation on Firms’ Proactive and Passive Motivation for Bribery in China

The Ability and Willingness of Family Firms to Bribe: A Socioemotional Wealth Perspective

Bribery in Family Firm: an Ability-Willingness Paradox

Greasing the wheels of bank lending: Evidence from private firms in China

Does It Pay to Bribe? the Influence of Firm Bribery Activity on Venture Disbanding

Is the Squeaky Wheel Getting the Grease? Earnings Management and Government Subsidies

Managerial Cash Compensation, Government Control and Leverage Choice: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Bribery in Emerging Economies: an Integration of Institutional and Non-Market Position Perspective

Is Individual Bribery or Organizational Bribery More Intolerable in China (versus in the United States)? Advancing Theory on the Perception of Corrupt Acts

Bribe Payments under Regulatory Decentralization: Evidence from Rights Offering Regulations in China

Closing the Revolving Door: What if Board Political Connections Are Permanently Broken?

Corporate Governance Strength,Audit Effort and Audit Quality

Influence Activities and Favoritism in Subjective Performance Evaluation: Evidence from Chinese State-Owned Enterprises

How does anti-corruption policy affect the sensitivity of green innovation to executive incentives?

Do Auditors Consider Alleged Bribery when Accepting Clients? Evidence from Chinese Non-State-owned Enterprises

Market Orientation, Electronic Supply Chain Integration, and Firm Performance in China: The Moderating Role of Ownership Type.

Corporate relationship spending and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China's anti-corruption campaign