Abstract:Purpose Against the background of the enormous economic transition China is undertaking, government intervention over corporate behavior is a frequent and, arguably, necessary measure. Among the most serious problems facing China, economically and reputationally, are environmental issues. So, how is the government intervening in the environmental performance of Chinese enterprises? And how are Chinese enterprises responding? These are the questions to be answered in this study. Design/methodology/approach This paper sampled listed companies on China’s Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges. The data were collected from the HeXun corporate social responsibility report, CSMAR and WIND databases. A Tobit model was used to conduct the main 2SLS regression analysis, and the robustness tests followed the propensity score matching method. Findings The analysis shows that environmental performance is positively related to the government subsidies a company receives. The “Eight-point Regulation of the Centre” crack-down on social corruption introduced in 2012 has weakened rent-seeking overall, but rent-seeking behavior through the cloak of corporate environmental performance has become more serious. As a result, non-polluting and state-owned enterprises are significantly less concerned about their environmental performance, while polluting and private enterprises are more motivated to become good environmental citizens. Practical implications This research provides a greater understanding of the drivers behind environmentally-responsible behavior in Chinese companies. These insights can be used by policymakers and environmental regulators to incentivize a more widespread ground-swell of change across the gamut of Chinese business. Social implications Environmental policy and practice informed by research-driven recommendations can not only make valuable contributions to the health and well-being of Chinese society but also, as a significant contributor to climate change, environmental reforms have global benefits. Originality/value This study explores the motivations behind rent-seeking associated with environmental investment. The findings expand the research horizon of relevant literature on corporate political rent-seeking and deepen the understandings of the economic consequences of corporate investment into environmental practice. The results provide empirical evidence for the Chinese government to implement environmental regulations based on incentives beyond simple profit-making.

Environmental Performance and Corporate Risk-Taking: Evidence from China

ESG performance and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China

Environmental, Social and Governance Performance: Analysis of CEO Power and Corporate Risk

Corporate environmental responsibility in China: a strategic political perspective

ESG Performance, Institutional Investors and Corporate Risk-taking: Empirical Evidence from China

Does environmental information disclosure mitigate corporate risk? Evidence from China

Geopolitical Risk and Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China

Corporate environmental responsibility and default risk: Evidence from China

Environmental Protection Tax Policy and Corporate Risk-Taking: Evidence from China

ESG performance and business risk—Empirical evidence from China's listed companies

Excess stock returns and corporate environmental performance in China

Impact of Environmental Investment on Financial Performance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Determinants of Corporate Risk Taking and Risk-Return Relationship

Promoting or Inhibiting? The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Corporate Financial Performance—An Empirical Analysis Based on China

Managerial Foreign Experience and Corporate Risk-Taking: Evidence from China

Environmental investment, climate risk and firm climate resilience: evidence from China

Environmental information disclosure and corporate financial performance: Evidence from China

“Risk” or “Opportunity”? The High Sensitivity of Corporate Green Innovation to Environmental Policy Uncertainty: Evidence from China

Environmental regulations and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China's real-time air quality monitoring policy

Environmental risk exposure and executive pay-for-performance sensitivity