Abstract:Taking China's A-share listed companies from 2014 to 2021 as the research sample, this article verifies the differential impact of executive equity incentive and employee stock ownership plan on enterprise performance and examines the economic consequences of their implementation under the influence of environmental uncertainty, the nature of property rights, and the quality of external audit. The results show that 1) there are significant differences between executive equity incentive and employee stock ownership plan on enterprise performance. 2) The effect of executive equity incentive is more significant when the environmental uncertainty is low, while the effect of employee stock ownership plan is more significant when the environmental uncertainty is high. 3) The equity incentive of state-owned listed companies cannot significantly improve enterprise performance when the environmental uncertainty is high. 4) High-quality external audit can significantly improve the effect of equity incentive on enterprise performance, and the effect is more obvious when the environmental uncertainty is high. The research conclusion confirms the necessity of reasonably selecting equity incentive objects under the influence of environmental uncertainty and also provides a useful reference for optimizing the reform of equity incentive system of state-owned enterprises and perfecting the external audit system.

Environmental risk exposure and executive pay-for-performance sensitivity

Environmental Performance and Corporate Risk-Taking: Evidence from China

Performance sensitivity of non-executive compensation in China: The role of economic policy uncertainty

Top executive pay and firm performance in China

From greed to good: how government regulations of executive compensation impact corporate ESG performance?

Impact of executive pay gap on environmental, social, and governance disclosure in China: Is there a strategic choice?

Overemployment, Executive Pay-for-performance Sensitivity and Economic Consequences: Evidence from China

Does Executives' Compensation Stickiness Encourage Environmental Investments? An Environmental Attention-Based Perspective

Corporate Environmental Responsibilities and Executive Compensation: A Risk Management Perspective

Do all CEO pay regulations hurt firm performance? Evidence from China

Energy related public environmental concerns and intra-firm pay gap in polluting enterprises: Evidence from China

Executive compensation and corporate sustainability: Evidence from ESG ratings

Investigating the ‘Short Pain’ and ‘Long Gain’ Effect of Environmental Regulation on Financial Performance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Polluting Firms

Location Matters: The Impact of Surrounding Environmental Condition on CEO Compensation

Subnational Institutional Contingencies and Executive Pay Dispersion

Environmental, Social and Governance Performance: Analysis of CEO Power and Corporate Risk

Executive equity incentives, employee stock ownership plans, and enterprise performance: Empirical evidence based on environmental uncertainty

Can Environmental Regulation Reduce Labor Costs and Improve Business Performance? Evidence From the Air Quality Index

Executive Compensation and Legal Investor Protection: Evidence from China'S Listed Firms

Environmental regulation, ESG, and firm value: evidence from China