The Formation of Precedent and the Case-guiding System in China
Song Xiao
2011-01-01
Abstract:From the perspective of functionalism, the case—guiding system in China may be classified into the system of precedent in a broad sense. The formation and selection of our guiding cases mainly depend on the extra—judicial power of the Supreme People's Court, which are not rested on the judicial hierarchy and do not follow the approach of the general formalism. In order to promote the case—guiding system, the trial instance jurisdiction should be reformed accordingly, and the judicial function of the Supreme People's Court should be strengthened, while the legislative function reduced. The Supreme People's Court and the Superior People's Court should have the power to select and set guiding cases from those decided by themselves. The standard of selecting guiding cases should be specific and flexible rather than general. A judge or the panel of judges who preside o-ver the case should be granted the preliminary power to select guiding cases, so the case—load will be decreased, the efficiency will be promoted, and judges will be able to spend more time and efforts to write the opinions of guiding cases. It is impossible for a precedent to be followed virtually without being followed formally. Our case—guiding system should allow judges to cite guiding cases directly in their opinions, because without the formal requirement of direct citation, those guiding cases published by the Supreme People's Court will never be accepted as guiding ones in the sense of precedents. The system of precedent is closely connected with and mutually decided by the whole judicial system, even the whole legal system. The case—guiding system in China, however, intentionally distances itself from a series of judicial system, such as the court system, the trial instance jurisdiction, the professionalization and independence of judges, so the actual effect of guiding cases could be doubted. The perfection of the case —guiding system in China should be joined with the judicial reform, and both the system and the reform will be promoted mutually and reciprocally.